Did you do it?

Probably would have turned him into a commie

probably add more consequences from different endings but not much more beacuse this was pretty much the best quest in fo3

Yes I count on em'

Attached: treemeister.jpg (400x400, 24.71K)

Made it all about some sort of half-assed political or social commentary that retards think is really deep.

The Ghouls would have been yet another political faction with a bunch of stupid fetch quests to take care of for them.
Depending on your actions, they would either help invade the NCR dam or take over Caesar's camp, spawning a group of ineffectual melee meat shields during the siege map.
The siege map would be horribly broken and you would have to use the console to get back out to the main game.

Yeah need that defence buff

>they don't do the bad ending, load a save and do the good ending, then continue

Attached: 1596295755450.jpg (240x320, 21.11K)

>NOOOOOO I'TS BORING BAD BAD BROING BAD!!!!!!! Zig Forums TOLD ME AND YOU HAVE TO THINK THE SAME!!!!!!

Was he the reason the oasis thing existed? I remember nothing. If he is the reason then he must keep suffering

Vault City annexing Gecko would probably be canon and Harold would have taken Raul's place on Black Mountain

Attached: 1534019352058.jpg (500x717, 193.99K)

I played the quests where you find the doctor on the repurposed battleship trying to find your father. I went out west far enough to go to the faux-vampire people.
At around that point I had enough of the shitty bland subway system maps, awful combat, and generally downgraded RPG elements compared to Fallout 1 & 2, and stopped playing.
We didn't know it then, but Fallout 3 was the beginning of the end for the franchise. Now it's just a husk of its former self, another boring as fuck post-apocalyptic looter shooter with NPCs that do nothing but function a quest-giver hubs.

you forgot your wojack pic you giant sperg

>At around that point I had enough of the shitty bland subway system maps
So you admit you've never played Fo3 before and that your entire argument against it is invalid? Cool.
>b-but-
No buts, anyone who has ACTUALLY played Fo3 knows what's wrong with your post, but you never will, because you've never played Fo3 before, so you'll keep spouting the same incorrect garbage over and over again always losing your argument the moment you post it.

lmfao i remember this fucking guy

>shitty bland subway system maps
Ya didn't play the game

made him a treenny

Why yes, I set him on fire for being ugly, how could you tell?

Attached: 1596247573087.png (1068x600, 700.31K)

Not him, but I fucking hate exploring the D.C. area. It was just annoying to go through and would give me headaches. I don’t think fallout 3 is bad tho. New Vegas is about the same as 3 but with a better story

Back when Bethesda still had a lick of creativity.

>letting Harold have to live in a mediocre game for the rest of his existence

I flamethrowered him to make sure he was dead.

You're delusional if you found the gray underground maps anything but color-by-the-numbers boring as fuck

>changing the subject

>Dupont
>Anacostia
>Tenleytown
>Metro Central
>Franklin
>L'Enfant Plaza
I could go on, but I think you get the point. Most of the maps in Fallout 3 are the DC subway system, or the Metro.
If you didn't understand that you're too fucking stupid to bother having a conversation with.
Actually, makes total sense why you enjoyed Fallout 3 now.

>You must be above 25 years old to play this game

>Most of the maps in Fallout 3 are the DC subway system
No they're not. Pic related.

Attached: Untitled.png (725x731, 1.12M)