2-3 wasn’t that bad

2-3 wasn’t that bad

Attached: C772F339-F641-4A47-A7B5-1E87E3E8A319.gif (256x192, 30.08K)

the only likable character from that case

It is

It manages to have every ace attorney trope I hate and still be completely unmemorable.

Name three tropes

Moe's sprites in the DS are empty on the bottom, they didnt try to hide this was originally on gba

It really wasn't. 4-3 is worse.

What do you mean empty?

Investigations case 3 is the worst by far

Soft locked my self during this one

Why is every game's case 3 bad?

All sprites on the DS are just the old GBA sprites but with the bottom part added because the DS screen is taller. But with Moe, the top part of his body (that did show in the GBA) has buttons and smiles while the lower part is empty blue

>Prove this person is lying ten times and why before they finally leave the stand
>It's a press twenty statements testimony
>It's a press twenty statements, go back, and press another testimony
>Multiple pieces of evidence can prove a statement wrong, but only one is used.
I think it's actually missing Mia saves Phoenix from having to grow as a lawyer moment, so it doesn't have everything I hate.

Dual Destinies was pretty good

>”the defendant is blind, no! actually lamirior is the one blind!”
> “the killer missed one of the shots, that makes perfect sense that the killer was blind!”
>Watching the concert video a billion times.
This case was a fucking mess

I liked 1-3, even if the characters weren't the beat.

Fair enough. I dislike these as well but I still didn’t hate the case

This is true for pretty much anything, user
Hook 'em early, blow 'em away at the end. The middle almost always has filler, or at least the less interesting content they could come up with

>mfw the fuckhead judge straight up condemns my client to death because i only had one allowance left and the clown made a dumb fucking diarrhea joke
like i totally walked into it so i'm not faulting the game design but what the fuck judge

Attached: kirby.jpg (400x400, 138.18K)

Attached: 34634879_p14.png (700x600, 314.34K)

Usually, AA games go like this:
Case 1 is a tutorial; from T&T onwards a loose end from this case ends up being super important later on
Case 2 is the first real case and despite being "early" in the game it's usually quite meaty even if it's not related to the last case. This is because the writers make it from the POV that this case solidifies the player's enjoyment.
Case 3 is usually the "lol this is the case which has nothing to do with main plot"
Case 4, if it's not the final case, it works as a stepping stone to build up the final case (3-4 & 5-4 come to mind)
Case 5 is the big epic story

DGS1's and Layton v AA's third cases are the best in those games lol

Why did Crapcom stop localizing the Ace Attorney games, bros?

It has a glaring plothole (Treelo being in two places at once); that alone makes it the worst.

It never sold that well outside of Japan

2-3 is the second best case from 2.
Fight me.

>it's just a single pixel all the way down
They clearly didn't even bother drawing more of him than they needed to when rushing 2 out.

1-3 is one of the best cases in the entire series and I will smack down anyone who disagrees. Miles coming to your rescue was rad.

well, 2-1 sucks (it's funny, though: "wellington loves large bananas")
2-2 was kinda creepy so i liked it. 2-3 doesn't SUCK, the anime version was cool, it's just annoying at some parts
JFA was a fine game overall, people overreact a little

It was terrible. The trick was stupid, the motive for murder was stupid, and the characters were stupid (especially the puppet and the clown).

>writing the killer's name in blood
Gotta include this one

DGS1-3 was interesting, but having lying jurors who work for your defendant put a bad taste in my mouth, plus it being the first jury trial is weird, it should've been introduced at the beginning of the game instead.

The only retarded thing about 2-3 is how Phoenix knew that the Bust was the murder weapon.
>the victim was struck with a large object
>the object must've been this bust
>no we don't know where the bust is or have any indication that it's even involved
>my proof is this picture of the bust, which proves that it exists I guess