The great debate

The great debate...

Attached: oldfronts.png (1280x720, 1.56M)

I like the original a lot more than 2

2 was better than the original

I like both equally

/thread

Yes

I barely remember the first Battlefront. Battlefront II pretty much blew it out of the water in every regard from what I recall.

Both are great and have different maps. I'd say the main benefits of two is the jedi and every thing is a little bit more fleshed out. Love the bespin map of battlefront 1

I remember there was a bunch of things I liked more with 1 than how they did it in 2. Both were really great games though.

Lads, why are the prequels such garbage movies but make up the most kino locations for the games?

1 feels like a much more solid game. 2 is janky for some reason.

i like new 2 and old 2

Battlefront 1 had some great maps like Rhen Var Harbor and Kashyyk, which is miles better than BF2's Kashyyk. But 2 is still the better game.

Why did Pandemic take away the asymmetrical engineers in 2?

>Get Battlefront 2 on PC
>Get the Battlefront 1 Conversion Pack mod with all the BF1 Maps
The only thing I like more about Battlefront 1 is that it had some great maps that didn't have a similar map for Battlefront 2, like the map with the sand anus.

Because George is a good world builder, but a bad story teller.

One has better everything expect aerial combat and Galactic Conquest.

>Battlefront 1 Conversion Pack
Bloated memeshit. Get Marvel4's pack instead.

Attached: 1592235247406.png (513x697, 429.29K)

This is the correct answer. Two was best at almost everything, save for maps and the removal of going prone(at least let snipers do it).

how does 2 perform on modern pc hardware?

>More unique units
>Tighter controls (IMO)
>More maps
>Space battles
>Jedi battles
>501st campaign
2, no question. 1 is still a good game, but 2 is better in almost every respect.

Very good

2 nerfed the launching capabilities of wrist rockets, which was a crime.

The only difference I really remember with BF1 is that Hero units were not playable and Dark Troopers were better since they had blasters instead of shock guns.

My main memory of the game was being able to easily kill Mace Windu on Bespin by using the droid wrist rocket to launch him off the map.

1 has better maps that had ground to air combat. 2 is just a bunch of space battle bloat. You can also go prone.

they’re both mediocre

The prequel trilogy was a wonderful foundation for video games to build upon, introducing lots of cool new characters, vehicles, and worlds. Opposed to the sequel trilogy, which tried to hard to be the original trilogy.

Finn and Poe are about the only thing I like about those shit movies. Thankfully Finn is a G in the new BF2

Because despite their flaws, the Prequel Trilogy was filled to the brim with soul and all sorts of new and interesting things that were prime material for vidya, cartoons, toys, etc. and captured our imaginations.

Attached: hydrated.jpg (1166x1243, 84.85K)

based. 2 was when the series turned into lightsaber/hero porn. In 1 you were just some random asshole getting blown the fuck up by some other random asshole. I loved that. Also you couldn't lay down in 2. That was gay.

1 for maps
2 for content

1 has manlet mode
2 does not have manlet mode
I rest my case

Attached: Savior of humanity.png (110x206, 63.09K)

2 has the timeless galactic conquest split screen mode. It would get heated at sleepovers with friends