Planes in tank mode

the entire point of WT is combined arms
there is other games for you to play if you don't want that

there actually are not
wot is not an alternative

>the entire point of WT is combined arms
Where's infantry?

in the mission editor ))

Still waiting for reply.

i just told you moron
they are in the mission editor

Attached: 2015-12-11_00001.jpg (800x450, 365.42K)

So the tank mode is not really a combined arms.

please purchase warmly enlisted

the definition of combined arms does not state that infantry is required, only a component

>combined arms without combining multiple arms

>plane, tonk, heli all in the same game
this is combined arms
it by definition is just more than one type of weapons system, please stop being retarded

>backbone of combined arms isn't present
>combined arms

>For example, an armored division—the modern paragon of combined arms doctrine—consists of a mixture of infantry, tank, artillery, reconnaissance, and perhaps even helicopter units
Where's infantry in tank mode?

you can greentext all you want but there is no requirement for infantry in the definition of combined arms

Planes in tank mode is always going to be complete dogshit for as long as AI gunners are braindead.

>perhaps even helicopter units
you've proven yourself wrong with your own greentext
none of them are required, it simply has to be a mixture of different equipment

>perhaps even helicopter units
And infantry. No plane mention though.

nothing in this definition states there MUST be infantry, only two different kinds of arms or more
I can't believe I need to spoonfeed basic concepts like this

Attached: Capture.png (1237x82, 11.96K)

fuck i want them to add infantry into arcade mode so bad. Like I know they'll never do it because it'll make their game pg13 or whatever, but god damn does the game feel weird with a company's worth of tanks fighting over an urban area with no infantry or anti-tank guns in sight

also make hull machine guns work, wtf how have they still not done this?

>only two different kinds of arms or more
So why not just infantries and tanks in tank mode?

because the game's engine is based off of apache air assault which is a fucking decade old and the engine was never designed for that

>spawn plane
>bomb enemy and immediately plow into the ground
Very realistic. Many tales are told of RAF pilots who, upon bombing a tiger, immediately rammed into the nearest townhouse in order to return to their tank as soon as possible.

>g.91 r/4 spam
Literally quit the game over this, axis todlers ruin everything

>ground force mode combined arms
>no infantry
So realistic.

never claimed it was realistic, or even good(hint hint it's not)
but it is by definition combined arms

It's not but what did you expect from a Russian p2w scam game?

Where's that definition from? Mine is from the U.S. Army Fort Benning and The Maneuver Center of Excellence.
That just looks like a textbook generic definition that can be applied to as many situations as possible, but at any point in time and space combined arms must include all arms available to make sense, so for this game's setting and scenario (i.e it isn't a naval wargame), infantry should be present to properly represent Combined Arms.

Attached: 226265.jpg (850x168, 166.31K)

>appropriate combinations
the game was never designed around infantry, the maps aren't designed for infantry at ALL, therefor it is not an appropriate combination for infantry

So it isn't a realistic depiction of combined arms after all? Thanks for conceding.