What game lets you use twiddly diddlies?

what game lets you use twiddly diddlies?

Attached: dwarvesfuckelves.webm (640x266, 2.55M)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=Cuu1SKxSqOg
youtube.com/watch?v=V9HrGfkI2mw&t=3592s&ab_channel=k9black
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

more like basedlves lol

Attached: f4adcae5aec8091afce2f7f1a9aad4a2c0d09fb9v2_hq.jpg (1024x576, 38.52K)

Use what? The fuck are "Twiddly Diddlies"? Do you mean arrows? The fuck is with the baby talk OP?

That's actually pretty cool, I can't imagine it would work that well in real life but neat none the less

In the movie a dwarf taunts the elves after impact and says something like "How'd you like those twiddly diddlies"

actually makes sense

Unironically one of the only scenes I remember from these fucking films.
It was the only bit that wasnt generic soulless cartoon slop and was actually creative

I mean even if it did work like that it becomes useless of the enemy launches arrows at random and not together

I'm guessing that the Elves had used that mass archer barrage technique multiple times to great success so other races had to work out a counter.

>game has fire arrows

Attached: 4iiixlnnj58z.jpg (369x426, 107.18K)

Fuck Elves. Everytime I see one I add it to the book of grudges.

Attached: 1601021434273.jpg (700x763, 67.55K)

The only fucking good thing ablut the movies was Martin Freeman, that the dwarfs who werent Thorin and Balin had unique characteristics (though most were bad characters), and Laketown's aesthetic

Attached: LakeTown.jpg (1920x800, 978.34K)

Very true, especially if they've seen this weapon before in which case they likely wouldn't do coordinated fire like that anymore. But if all it takes is one good block to close the gap between the melee units and whatever the elves here had then it's effective enough. I don't know the first thing about LotR for the record so I am lacking any sort of context.

Is this the third Hobbit movie?

God, they were shit. Everything wrong with modern hollywood.

They were real, aksheyewalleee

>Zig Forums defending hobbit trilogy

I don't know why I'm surprised

That scene was just for the movie, nothing like that ever occurd or was detailed in the book

Get fucked knife-ear

Attached: cute elves.png (1473x2049, 1.46M)

I've watched all three hobbit films over the past 2 days, extended versions.

They're fun and provide comfy adventure feels few films can match except for LOTR, which I'll be putting on next

Attached: 078.jpg (613x1000, 109.56K)

Correction, they're twiddly widdlies, not twiddly diddlies
youtube.com/watch?v=Cuu1SKxSqOg

The delivery wouldn't work in any other accent

Attached: 1574581459578.jpg (736x981, 136.09K)

Nice, I'm watching the extras from the films. It's super interesting.
youtube.com/watch?v=V9HrGfkI2mw&t=3592s&ab_channel=k9black

>he didn't like the films
>still went on to see the extended edition
what's wrong with you?
fuck off, only plebs dislike it

>fuck off, only plebs dislike it
It's actually the reverse. Only brainlets think it's good.

Now where the fuck was that shit in the fight against Sauron? Gondor and Rohan really could have used the help.

>No Lord of the Rings Dynasty Warriors.

>the pleb thinks he's smart for disliking a harmless fantasy trilogy

Attached: 1585313078450.jpg (1090x631, 105.9K)

>The Elves ran and hid in the Undying lands while the Men of Middle Earth took the threat of Sauron head on.

It's garbage because it's trying to emulate LotR, which is fucking impossible because the Hobbit is like 1/4 the size of LotR. That means they had to stretch the story way too fucking much and pump it full of pointless filler.
Remember when Thorin fought Azogwho is fucking dead in the books btw and the ringwraiths theme started playing for some reason? Good times.
I have no problems with the book, its pretty good.

>which is fucking impossible because the Hobbit is like 1/4 the size of LotR
But the Hobbit isn't nearly as densely written as LOTR, and the amount of stuff that happens PLUS some other stuff to further develop things like Bard, the White Council and a bunch of other stuff, you can easily get three (shorter) movies worth of content. The only legit filter revolves around Tauriel, Legolas, Kili and Alfrid, but even then they still have scenes that contribute to the main plot, or they add some action in sections that would otherwise be too slow, so it's not even that much damage.

They aren't good films, objectively, but the first two are fun enough when you think of them as adapted DF campaigns

the dwarfs and men of Dale had their own war to deal with in the north at the time

>tfw these stupid fucking movies ruined our chance at high framerate movies for another 50 years or so by being so shitty

Attached: angry.gif (340x318, 803.55K)

>hmmmm they have a hard counter to our arrow barrages
>better do it again

>objectively
there he is using that word to make his opinions seem more important

right, The Hobbit isn't as dense as LOTR, so trying to stretch it to three movies was R E T A R D E D

Yeah that's the problem, it would have been a much better movie if they only made one and not three. The fuck is the point of that love triangle? Dol Guldur could be skipped completely, so could anything Azog related because he's dead duh. Multiple things could be cut from this mess and it would make for a much better experience.

you can't honestly look at the effects and say they're good by any metric, and the movies were like 75% effects