arstechnica.com
First journalism review for Baldur Gate 3 is in
>Journo opinion
Why dont you fucking kill your self OP?
Cope
So his main complaints were that he had to save scum to get what he wanted, and that no one liked him in the game.
Special snowflake journo at its finest.
anyone who take vidya journalism seriously is a gigantic fucking spineless faggot jesus christ
this also counts for opinions on here for example that fucking blablabh gobbledeegook impact game its gay and faggy as fuck
why would anyone copy opinions from someone else its so goddamn faggy and retarded with the emphasis on faggy because you are a fucking spineless faggot
>5e
Fucking DROPPED.
Well I’m sad it went to early access. Lost faith as sun as i heard
oh no no no
dont want to read that trash of an article but how the fuck did he get everyone to hate him?
Ticked the right wing political stance on character creation
>Turn based in 2020
No thank you.
zoomer faggot
dq xi is great
>The worst part about all this encounter was my party, who you can clearly see idly lolling about in the background. They didn't care when the mind flayer very obviously got its hooks in me. They also didn't care when the mind flayer forced me to lie down with it so that it could eat my brain right in front of them.
Sounds pretty shitty. Going straight from dialogue to death is point-and-click tier garbage.
I can understand the complains about extra movement leftover atleast, after playing Wasteland 3. It would be broken as fuck to have extra actions or bonus actions by saving like Wasteland, but not moving as a fighter definitely happens
You forgot the part where that happened because he PASSED an int-check. Who the fuck designs it like that?
nobody wants you here anyway grognard idiot
REMEMBER: Always do the opposite of what game journos say
You are sad and surprised it went to early access.... just like their previous two games?
>you see, i am a veteran D&D player with 50 years of experience
>and it triggers me that in this game there's dice rolling
Okay retard.
Does this have separate turns for party and enemy instead of intertwined turns based on individual initiative? Jesus Christ
Who pissed on your crayons this morning, retard?
Why do these faggots expect anything from an unfinished game?
reviews for early access is retarded
>I've been a Dungeons & Dragons enthusiast for roughly 40 years, going back to Blue Book Basic D&D as a small child in the late 1970s. To the best of my knowledge, I've played every licensed D&D and AD&D computer RPG ever made.
I mean the guy doesn't seem underqualified to talk about this stuff.
>giving clicks to pedotachnica
WE WUZ ELFS AND SHIIIIIIIIEEEEEEETTTTTT
And yet the things he complains about are the same that a random first time player would.
At the same time being mad that "its not the same as tabletop!!!!" and "its too similar to tabletop!!!!", like with the actions rules and the dice rolls.
I mean
Even back in the day, we all agreed that save scumming was just plastering over bad game design. We were used to it in 1998 because we didn't know better.
In 2020, there's TONS of CRPGs that are still fun and good without save-scumming. That's not something you should have to do anymore.
because they are charging full price for it upfront?
>game journo opinions
And people care because...?
>female nipple
JANNY! THIS IS AN OUTRAGE I'M GOING TO FILE A COMPLAINT WITH MOOT ABOUT THIS CHILDREN COULD BE WATCHING THIS BOARD
>game journo think it's shit
Sounds like a good game then
When game journos agree with me, they are based and should be listened to.
Only when they disagree with me they are pozzed and should be avoided.
You could try not being retarded.
>Journo says dont buy
Yeah, its a save buy for me
>female
believe it or not, there is such a thing as male elves
Would you prefer the game design decision that all loot is generated during the loading screen, and you can't save scum? Because that results in the EXACT same experience as just choosing not to savescum.