Will latency improve to 1ms or 0.5ms in cloud gaming in 1-2years?

will latency improve to 1ms or 0.5ms in cloud gaming in 1-2years?

Attached: image.jpg (1080x960, 77.69K)

Our hearts go out to all the people (5) waiting for their input to register.

on stadia you are constantly downloading the game
forever
you are never not downloading when playing stadia
what a dumb post

isn't streaming significantly worse in the long run for bandwidth/data caps than downloading a large file once

Depends on how much you play and how big the game is but generally yes.

>16 retweets

PAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHA

>will humanity overcome the speed of light to play video games?

This is how you sound

lmao data caps it's like we're back 20 years ago

Sarcasm is lost on text. They are saying "Fuck you" to people who aren't streaming it.

Imagine thinking streaming is the way of the future, when the performance we can get out of handheld hardware is still increasing every year.

Imagine thinking we'll somehow surpass light-speed before just building a device beefy enough to play RDR2 on the go.

Attached: cini.jpg (631x536, 55.13K)

With utter certainty, no. I live closer to a Google datacenter than most and and a round trip at light speed would be about 1ms.

Datacaps still exist, user.

I'd rather download a 200 gb game once than constantly downloading Jewgle's unreliable video stream with input delay.

I've heard they're still pretty common in burgerland

Not that it matters if you don't have a datacap, but playing a game at 25 Mbps for 60 hours is 675 gigabytes, and for 100 hours is over a terabyte. They also are ignoring pre-loading which most games allow before a release date now.

>queue up download
>take a shower
>it’s ready when I’m out
What’s the problem?

vastly so. Especially with 4K streams.

We don’t all spend 3 hours prepping and using a bad dragon in the shower

>16 retweets
KEK

Attached: 1587919285833.png (834x818, 225.69K)

They still exist in third world countries like the USA

How is that possible? Shithole third world countries offer gigabit or close to gigabit internet without datacaps for wired connections.

nope, because it's a fundamentally intractable last-mile problem, that in addition ISPs are also inclined to deliberately further confound. the only way it will happen is as an ISP service with special end-to-end hardware.

they're going to push it regardless, even if it's still up-to-100ms target latency, because it's a huge rent-seeking racket.

That only exists in flyover states that willingly let Trump and Republicans fuck them in the ass with dystopian level capitalism. I pay $30 a month for gigabit fiber optic internet.

Stop questioning

Can't break the laws of physics no matter how stupid you are or how much google pays.

That's a real issue for me, since i got 100Mb internet i have to jack off really quick becqause everything downloads way too fast

Physically impossible

Welcome to America, the land of the (almost) free

And he was pointing out how that sarcasm is unwarranted.

bandwidth cost money and consumer ISPs rent bandwidth of other ISP or networks (by example my isp rent the Apollo, a cable submarine). Datacaps = less bandwidth = lower Apollo´s fees

>gigabit
I can't even get half that without a business contract where I am in bugerland

Light goes around the earth 7.5 times a second, or once every 133 ms. A ping requires you to go to the destination and back, so for a person on the opposite side of the globe the absolute fastest ping would be 133ms.
For 1ms you would need to be closer than 190 miles.