Pokemon looked better with spri-

>Pokemon looked better with spri-

Attached: soul.png (546x243, 31.16K)

Bait of lower quality than the inbetween sprites

this but unironically
look at this funny eel haha

Attached: eelektross.gif (96x79, 119.72K)

Had they stuck with sprites the overall quality of them could have improved with newer releases. More pixel allocation and whatnot.

they really did but not because 3D is bad, but because they suck at it
3D is essential for the evolution of the serie, unfortunately GF is incompetent

>left
expresses an emotion of concern, moves in an exaggerated way to convey its form
>right
emotionless, minimal movement and sterile posture, might as well open the model in blender in t-pose

Sprites seriously looked like ass in final years, and they were never as animated as the 3D models are.
The people that say the sprites were better literally act like they dont even play the games, because their entire argument boils down to "the sprites, which has virutally no animation, is drawn in a way that looks more active than the 3D models do when they are idle and not showing one of their multiple animations"

It did.

You, the virgin.
>The people that say the sprites were better literally act like they dont even play the games, because their entire argument boils down to "the sprites, which has virutally no animation, is drawn in a way that looks more active than the 3D models do when they are idle and not showing one of their multiple animations"
Me, the chad:
>Yes.

SWSH retard

>Using a Smear Sprite to try to prove a point.
You could of easily used many of the lazy tween animated B/W B2/W2 sprites but you instead went for a inbetween.

Attached: 1430978666242.gif (210x240, 28.5K)

Outside the cherrypicking, 3D logically SHOULD look better than 2D, but Gamefreak is so retarded with the animations of 3D that they don't even come close to how expressive the sprites were. Like, the pokemon just fucking stand still in their idle pose, and then they have a generic attacking, getting hit, and fainting animation. They don't do anything special, none of them feel unique, it's pure laziness.

Absolute fucking bullshit
>3D animation

Attached: sableye-2.gif (192x192, 183.5K)

>2D "animation"

Attached: ezgif-4-7ff0fee3bcd2.gif (96x96, 39.67K)

Wow nice cherrypicking, it's almost like I was speaking generally or something.
Fucking retard.

read
>IDLE pose
Genius Sorority is better than GF. Have them make a mainline game

>logically SHOULD look better than 2D
that sounds like a matter of preference user

-tes

-tes. Pokemon looked better with sprites. The models are incredibly bland.

Yes user, Gen 5 was played on a giant fucking screen and emulated for the intended purpose of showing you those fucking sprites

much like real life; 3D ugly, 2D cute

Someone just post the Typhlosion pic

funny eel of no weaknesses

>It’s another retard who thinks his blown up emulator sized screen is how everyone played the game

I admit I may have intertwined the general decline of quality that spans the post-5th gen games with the advent of 3D models. But the models have objectively bland coloring, questionable proportions on certain mons, lacking textures, and really awful animations.

Attached: garde grr.png (537x836, 168.7K)

>say none feel unique
>get proven wrong
First of all, you are just stupid and wrong.
Secondly it's the same for every fucking pokemon.

It might be a fair comparison if the sprites had actual animations beyond just the idle pose.
As it is now, its
>1 idle pose with shitty hop up and down "animation"

>1 idle pose where the pokemon is you know, idle
>multiple attack animations
>a fainting animation
>a getting attacked animation
>plus whatever else they have available in pokemon amie

The sprites are literally soulless in comparison.

Attached: d16cb587fc0c979573900b836abfacbd6fbd04cd_hq.gif (300x300, 356.2K)

Show examples of 3D Models that are actually better than their sprites

Are you the same autist from /vp/?

gen 5 sprites suck, yes, everyone knows that

If it's the same for every pokemon, why are you only posting 1?

blahblahblahblahblah
You are disingenuous, and showed your hand early by comparing an idle animation to an attack animation (which is performed while the Pokémon are at a screen's length from one another)
And you do this while pretending that people who do like sprites don't consider Genius Sorority's efforts of a higher quality because they make the Pokémon seem much more animated in battle than GameFreak ever has
Compare idle animations alone and do an overall ranking between GS 3D, GF 2D and GF 3D

They should have continued doing 2D sprites, but instead of pixel art it's hand drawn. It could be "sugimori style" or it could look like the anime or have a new style like watercolour something.
We have been deprived of hand drawn 2D throughout all of vidya history. It's a travesty.
3D has advantages but Game Freak aren't using them. Colosseum on N64 was literally better.

Attached: they say it be haha comrade.jpg (1022x688, 175.88K)