Demon's Souls Remake

So why isn't this considered a definite improvement again?
youtube.com/watch?v=ZBT73gw8s68
not enough brown & bloom? buildings too pointy?

Attached: des.png (2560x1086, 3.73M)

no soul

People here like to complain about things. No matter what it looked like, people would be complaining. You really shouldn't believe any opinion you read here.

user is right.
If it was a remaster, Zig Forums would complain.
If it looked different, Zig Forums would complain.
If it was on PC, Zig Forums would praise it for a week and then complain.

>it doesn't matter that the animations are worse than a 2008 game
>it doesn't matter that they put blue filter at everything
>it doesn't matter that they overdesigned bosses and enemies
>It doesn't matter the bosses looks like from a WOW expansion
>it doesn't matter that they switched to "over the shoulder cinematic ps5 game camera"
>it doesn't matter that the game is easier than the original
>it doesn't matter if they add P2W DLCs
>it doesn't matter that they forced this "photo realism" bullshit
>It doesn't need to fix the bugs
>It doesn't need to fix broken things in the game
>It doesn't matter they want $70 for a fucking remake
>It doesn't matter that bluepoint who ruined SOC remake is making demons souls remake
>It doesn't need to have SOUL

Attached: 1601246132777.webm (1176x338, 2.88M)

the game will sell

Cry more faggot

the only thing i have issues with is the lack of the archstone and just plopping grass everywhere like in the castle it's not been abandoned for that long, but then again there's not much else you could do and say it's a remake. please tell me the hud is still kino?

They still haven't showed the HUD sadly.

Attached: 1600699339408.webm (500x720, 2.97M)

>it doesn't matter he no longer looks like he's going to rape the shit out of Yuria using your guts as lube
Seriously, who gave these dipshits the OK to be "creative"?

Attached: fat official.jpg (1920x1080, 907.41K)

people act as if the graphics in demon's souls were an intentional choice and not just hardware limitations
the game barely runs at 30fps as it is

It looks like shit, tbqh
Completely removes the Demon's/Dark Souls feel to it
It's almost TOO polished....Something about it seems off.
I can't be the only one to feel this way, right?

Attached: 1579012980995.jpg (1000x1210, 343.4K)

Stop shilling this garbage faggot

Based

Hardware limitations led to an intentional choice. You faggots need to stop using this as an argument.

>Less oppressive lighting
>Completely different architectures
>Foliage all over the place, completely warping the timescale of the demon scourge
>Worse animations
>Worse music
>Worse voice acting

Attached: 1540040590261.jpg (323x630, 64.61K)

title contradicts you

he looks generic af.

it's the first souls game that doesn't look like it's a gen behind.

I just think they added a unnecessary amount of detail (read: cracks and moss) to things which defeats the purpose of some areas, the area where you fight Tower Knight is a good example as they added a shitload of decorations to the fortification that shouldn't be that ornamented.
They also seem to be redesigning a bunch of enemies to look more conventional, so to speak.

>Less oppressive lighting
I dread to think what they'll do to Tower of Latria. Lighting and sound design alone made that one of the best areas in the extended series.

Attached: fool's idol.jpg (620x876, 165.01K)

the more clutter, the less soul

not an excuse anymore, low-mid spec PC can run DeS 1080/60 for free.

>So why isn't this considered a definite improvement again?
The art direction and sound design are objective downgrades.

Zig Forums complains about everything, it looks really good now they've put the effort in to match the aesthetic but I'm not sold on the animations, they somehow look even clunkier than the original.

they didn't let any japanese youtubers play it for their shill videos. They even had them play Godfall.

It must be really dogshit.

>they've put the effort in to match the aesthetic
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

>they've put the effort in to match the aesthetic
Match what aesthetic? They're just arbitrarily changing shit they think will look more appealing to normies and, wouldn't surprise me, "less problematic".

To be fair, it didn't seem they were allowed that much time with each game to begin with. Admittedly, only saw Lulu and she got about 5m each tops.

Attached: suzuhara lulu3.jpg (800x786, 99.39K)

Are you blind? Just look at the camera angle in the remake. I want to play a Demon's Souls remake, not Uncharted 5.

you've literally seen 3 minutes of the game.

hahahahaha, yeah hilarious. It used to look like complete shit but they have taken an active effort to improve on it since the initial trailer. It's not perfect but a the very least it's somewhat matching the tone now.

Do some research before you out yourself as a retard, they've changed most of the shit people complained about.

Sorry, you're totally right. I now remember everyone saying what stopped the game from being a 10/10 were the gargoyle designs and the lack of cracks and grass everywhere.

Shut the fuck up, my initial excitement for the game was around a 2/10 and it's now p to a 3. I can at the very least appreciate and respect them for listening to feedback and changing shit. I still expect to like it even less than DS2 and it will probably be the worst Souls experience I've played.

old good new bad

Retard

It reminds me of those fan-made unreal engine videos. There is no distinct art direction

That's always the problem with things like externally done remakes and graphics rehaul mods. They don't know what was going through the original creator's mind during the initial development and tons of subtle decisions get lost with the goal of just making everything look prettier.

this but ironically
zoomers are trash and ruin everything