Seriously though, why is Sony okay with this but

These people think sex can't be artistic unless it looks ugly and disgusting, just like them. Same thing is happening to film industry. Look at the cast of the new star wars movies.

>super muttant
FTFY

WHY CAN YOU SHOW A MOVIE WITH A SEX SCENE IN A THEATRE BUT NOT PORN IT'S THE SAME THING IT'S NOT FAIR FUCKING SJWS

Attached: 1571416657824.png (1000x800, 156.92K)

anyone have that meme comp?

globohomo

Which one?

It's almost certainly because members of the Sony board that have the final say are buddy-buddy with western developers. First-party games get a pass even easier, obviously.

all of them

everything makes sense when you realise they despise shitposters on twitter with anime avatars

it all stems from that

argument: It's because in japanese games they're "totally not"-10 year olds. For most people there's a difference between a sexualized 10 year old and a sexualized 25 year old, even in fictional media.

counter argument: there are still double standards in your society. Eg, western media has no problem making pedo-bait movies like "leon the professional".

post Abby pussy

I have one question, though: why is the progressive left so much more successful than the moral right in their fight for censorship and prudishness? When it was right-wing religious groups pushing for everything to be censored, they never managed to take full control of anything and there was a mainstream resistance and counterculture opposition.

Attached: IMG_20200612_171834.jpg (303x302, 27.52K)

You'll understand when you reach maturity, hopefully.

right always hated video games and all the typical media so they never got work in that industry

first pic is "art"
this is "porn"

>a chicks ass is porn
Kys

probably because one was made as a narrative piece in an actual story while the other is just an excuse to shove some undeage girl's ass in your face so you can jerk off

either you fags just willfully pretend to not understand context or you're actually so broken that you think other people are like you and assume all nudity is for titilation only

“Equality” “diversity” and other such words that you can’t possibly protest because you’d be a bigot/racist

Attached: DD69F1FB-7617-4C79-8895-9FA8471F634D.jpg (1024x1024, 208.15K)

So censorship is about context and not content? How very proletariat of you

Why do you keep asking this when you know it's because the weeb games are pornographic?

yes user, it is in fact generally considered okay to sell anatomical guides featuring naked women in some department store but no some girl's nude pictures

because these people are broken in the head and honestly think people jerked off to the sex scene the way they jerk off to anime ass. the sad reality is Zig Forums probably thinks more about that sex scene that the "trannies" because this board is developmentally stunted and still act like 12 year olds about sex

the left have control of every single major institution
the only true conservatives that have power and influence are trump and tucker

It's communalism vs individualism.
Individuals are easier to control, so those who seek to do the controlling favor it.
Otherwise known as "divide and conquer".

How the fuck is it porn?

the left

Hrmmm. Depends on to what entities you're applying "progressive." Anyways, I'm not sure what you're seeing is censorship - in the sense that a third party is imposing its standards on a piece of media, insofar as the release of said media will be prohibited if it fails to meet the censor's standards. (Issues of market-based censorship and self-censorship might apply, but whatever.) Instead, companies release edits in a particular region that they think will do well there. So, for America, which historically is prudish about depictions of sex (even in the TLoU2 screenshot it's mostly hidden), companies will hide that shit. Ultimately, commercial interests can compete with artistic interests.

i know, it was literally a five second scene that i forgot in minutes, and there are people on this board who've talked about it for hours

you can go and show people how much mature by fucking a tranny, we'll just be here, being not mature.

The short answer is one's a choice and the other isn't. Don't criticize people for what they can't control, don't force your beliefs onto me, etc
The longer answer is that race/sexuality and religion are treated very differently. You can never criticize or question a minority no matter what they do or else you're branded as an X-ist forever. Meanwhile there's no real punishment for being against a religion. At worst you're just considered an atheist

>Meanwhile there's no real punishment for being against a religion
As long as the religion is Christianity, that is.

The leftist hates all forms of beauty, OP.
You have to understand that leftism is the ideology that catters to the lowest common denominator. This also includes the artistic illiterate base who ironically, have based all their mindset around art and entertainment.
These individuals aren't devoid of an artistic integrity but in fact, despise it. They despise everything that's pretty and beautiful in this world because it couldn't be as far from what they are. They think beauty is un-achievable thus they also believe that any portrayal of beauty is a direct attack on them.
When ugliness is propagated, they rejoice, since their essence is finally out there. What's worse is that they know no one wants to look at their ugliness but by forcing it to others, they finally achieved their revenge upon beauty.

>Nu-sony

Attached: 1600062348145m.jpg (1024x975, 208.44K)