I have finally found out which one is objectively better

Imagine making a bot to repost this shit thread.

whats wrong with doom?

Attached: 1577726762870.jpg (666x616, 104.13K)

what ISNT wrong with doom

ZOOM and ZOOM2 both have issues that could be discussed, but it's easier to make claims about which, if any, were the good one.
Ignore shitposters and pretend purists.

this
>doesn't provide an actual explanation
come on, point out exactly why the new doom games are bad.

Damn, it is almost as this place HATES FUN a lot.

Nothing really, they are both enjoyable games. Zig Forums is being contrarian again

>filtered by doom
>post about it on Zig Forums
Typical.

the new doom titles are pretty fun
been on serious sam lately though since it just feels nice to strafe dodge
the doom mod for it is something else, wish it didnt crash as much

>hates fun
>contrarian
>filtered
Retard post combo.

can I like them in context of the current gen?

>Doom Arena Vs. Super Doomario 64: Memellenial Edition

oof, hard choice there

Eternal is better gameplay wise but 2016 is way better in every other field
It's a huge shame really, id had some extremely talented designers and shat all over them with this flat out retarded story and epic le retro #hardcore SLAYA xD aesthetic

No matter what game id created you would have looked down upon it and called it terrible simply because its being released now instead of 20 years ago.

Its alright we get it.

I thought they were pretty good ngl

the only people who hate eternal are people who are trash at the game, prove me wrong

>tfw not allowed to think its just ok because i prefer slower shooters
Its good but I just dont see myself going for the higher difficulties since i never had the feeling of "i wanna do that fight again"

Not exactly. It is like the IQ graph where low IQ and high IQ people like it but the self proclaimed not-actually-so-smart intellectuals in the middle don't enjoy it.

OP is BASED AF today. what went wrong?

first one is great and is possibly the best fps game on last gen, not as good as previous doom games of course

eternal is ok, they took the franchise in the wrong direction but the game is still fun to play and looks amazing

>No arguments
I won. BOOM btw.

Boomer faggots complaining that a series that started decades ago isnt stagnent and evolved
They miss the retarded level design and hate everything new

Attached: 1764565.jpg (554x439, 62.68K)

When is the DLC coming? So I can reinstall in time.

For me it's DOOM 2: Hell on Earth (1994)

Zoom 1 is pretty good, Zoom 2's issue is mostly the lack of a fall back weapon like the pistol in 1, and Melee doing nothing without blood punch

i can respect that you admit that you simply don't have the skill to fully enjoy the gameplay, however if you played it below nightmare you didnt really play any of the fights
true op still hasnt provided a single argument

>like the IQ graph where low IQ and high IQ people like it
AKA the low IQ cope.

But pistol felt awful to use in 1. The sound and all. If they added more feel to it in 2 then okay maybe.

why would you need a fall back weapon when every single weapon is good and powerful? melee works as an interrupt and blood punch is extremely powerful which i think is a fine balance

this thread is of extremely low quality

Defender of both games here to tell you to halt posting for the foreseeable future

>however if you played it below nightmare you didnt really play any of the fights
i always play the default difficulty just so I can get use to whats expected, do the encounters really get that much better on higher difficulties? if so ill give it another go but i just never had a really fun time with it compared to something mindless like edf which also gets stupid challenging in the later and dlc missions
I'm not averse to difficulty user, just never felt truly engaged by what was on screen

its pretty hard to get engaged if no enemy proves to be a threat in any situation, nightmare will make you have to play the game properly as everything moves fast and does a lot of damage, meaning you have to actually be constantly moving and prioritize your targets adequately if you dont want to get overwhelmed

>I always play on the expected difficulty
There is no universal normal difficulty. If you are good you play on higher difficulties. If you are not you play on lower. Whatever gives YOU the best experience.

That's fair but it's less about need, more about want. It just feels weird to melee a guy out of FPS instinct repeatedly and for there to be actually no damage done

> fucking original doom and it's countless addons are better
JUST

Attached: 1574697226827.jpg (600x536, 80.54K)

OP is based