Daisy...
Daisy
Other urls found in this thread:
badwebcomicswiki.shoutwiki.com
twokinds.keenspot.com
twitter.com
I prefer doomguy with a demongirl
Twokinds is average at best, but Tom's art is pretty fucking good.
I want to fuck that Daisy.
Never read twokinds. Is it worth it?
Eh. I mean, it's nothing offensively bad. The first few chapters have some pretty serious cringey parts (like what you'd expect from early deviantart tier weeaboo scum), but it quickly gets better.
The story isn't really anything original, but it's been going on for quite a while, and I'd say that it's enjoyable enough for what it is. You do tend to start liking the characters, though I wouldn't say they have much depth at all. I think I like Slightly Damned more, but twokinds is fine.
Top tier sexy though, if you're into that sort of thing.
Cute paws
The artist is such a fucking hack.
why?
Daisy!
Daisy?
Oh, look, another person who red the entry on the badwebcomics wiki and decided that the opinions of one person should change their entire view of a comic that millions of people like.
I'm lost. Who's the artist and why the drama?
I'm surprised there's still no mod where you play as Daisy
Why are doom redditors so obsessed with shitty memes?
Artist is Tom Fischbach, known for a very popular furry webcomic called Twokinds, which has been around for over a decade at this point. He's also Markipliers brother, but that's not important at all.
The comic is not particular good or bad, but there are many people who have been EXTREMELY critical of it, and said a lot of shit honest to god is practically lies, whilst at the same there, there have apparently been a lot of cases where the author of the comic was a dick to people? I'm really not sure.
Just don't worry about it. Nothing special.
badwebcomicswiki.shoutwiki.com
Wait! This fanart was made by Tom Fischbach? His latest art is much more improved than in the past. And yet BadWebComics makes an awful cherry picking and only shows his oldest drawings.
Yeah, I'm kinda familiar with the drama over him but I never paid attention to it. Besides he's harmless, especially comparing to other furries like Dragoneer, the owner of furaffinity that has actual pedos and zoophiles running his site.
That page is so full of a bulllshit. Whoever wrote that entry is a massive idiot.
newcomers try to act more loyal to a brand to make up for the fact that they're still newbies and surface levels fans, compare to older ones that are more invested in a series
all they can do is post doot memes and isabelle crossovers, when it doesn't compare to the years of wads and source ports that actually kept interest in doom alive when the series was inactive
chances are these newcomers will drop doom when it stops being trendy
These are your average BWC "reviews". They even use Encyclopedia Dramatica articles as "credible" sources for their reviews.
Also most of the webcomics they review aren't even as bad as they claim and they're mediocre at worst.
Any relation to Mark Fischbach?
ed and kiwifarms were just the old version of the current cancel culture shit we have nowadays, but at least they were honest they did all that shit "for the lulz"
although even with some truth, it's funny seeing people complain about wokefags turning the internet into a 1984 dystopia when some lolcow enthusiasts occasionally doxxed some idiots just to create public pages on them
>"Artist is Tom Fischbach"
>"He's also Markipliers brother"
>"Any relation to Mark Fischbach?"
Come on dude. Basic reading comprehension.
It's pretty embarassing, honestly. I think the entry that confuses me the most is the one for slightly damned, which the creator of that article outright says "I came into this expecting it to be bad, but it's actually somewhat good, and can be enjoyable" ect ect. Like, why the fuck did you put it on the fucking badwebcomics wiki?
Wait. Mark Fishbach is Markiplier? Holy shit.
...who... who did you think he was?
deez nuts
*clap*
HAH
GOTTEEM!
...
>whiteknighting a furry degenerate who can't draw for shit even after over a decade of practice
>Can't draw for shit
are you blind, an asshole, or have you just not seen any of his work since literally a decade ago? Dude is a good artist.
twokinds.keenspot.com
>Bitching about a furry artist based on a shitty BWC article that whines about a "problematic" comic he made long time ago while his art has been improved a lot since then
Sad
Toms old art was cringe as fuck but it's pretty good now.
Story's not much better though.
BWW article is old and pretty shit to be honest
>this is what dogfuckers consider good art
Lmao.
...How is that not good art?
Do you just hate everything that's furry in any way, and choose to ignore any positive qualities?
I mean, fuck, it's like you don't even know what bad art looks like. Then again, you're probably just a troll, or genuinely retarded. Or both.