Have graphics peaked?

Have graphics peaked?

Attached: RDR5.jpg (3840x2160, 3.78M)

what ps2 game is this?

no

Attached: 1600302486346.webm (1918x1080, 2.88M)

No. Your pic will eventually look like shit 20 years in the future. Gameplay, on the other hand, seems to be stagnating to an unsettling degree.

what ps1 game is this?

This isn't dynamic like RDR2..just scripted walk up to linear area moment

soulsbros..

Attached: next gen current gen.jpg (3837x4306, 3.81M)

Looks like an amateur UE4 souls clone

nextgen RDR 2 with higher resolution textures, better implemented TAA and new hair/fur system when?

its arguably the king of graphics as is but if those weaknesses were fixed, wew

>vignette

into the trash

Fuck no, not even close. All modern graphics are still 2D planes with flat pictures layered onto each other. There’s no substance to objects. There are no deep sub surface mechanisms. Most devs don’t even bother putting physics on props or having any quality destruction. Graphics still have a long way to go.

who cares, it's a launch title for a new console, by the end of the PS5s life cycle it will guaranteed look worse than whatever's around
compare launch PS4 games to RDR2/Cyberpunk on PS4 Pro

Attached: 1603135453801.webm (1920x1080, 1.75M)

soulless. what about it? Battlefield 1 from 2016 and Flight Simulator from 2020 look better

red dead revolver

>TAA
rdr2 loses by default

>Posts a webm of the PC version on max settings
Uhhh.....

Nah, the problem is just that people have the wrong mindset about graphics. The next level isn't 8k puckered puffy horse buttholes but being able to render complex structures in an open world and filling it with 4k horse buttholes without shitting the bed in performance. It's like how Dead Rising on Wii had to massively cut down on the number of zombies or how Breath of the Wild had to massively spread out where it placed enemy forts and the like; with stronger grafix you can give more players more shit to do in an open space.

>TAA
not an issue at 4K

If you think DeS remake isn't also using TAA, you're an idiot.

so? whether it's on PC or not, graphics are still getting better
no matter how good 2077 looks, it will be topped in the future, graphics are nowhere near their limit

Attached: 1599053174433.jpg (3840x2160, 2.18M)

>The graphics are getting better on the platform where new tech is always being released
Uhh....

it probably is. tlou2 also had a proprietary TAA solution that looks much better than normal TAA.

Graphic have been more than good enough for a decade now, it's time to focus on physics

wow, almost as if graphics haven't peaked

Attached: 1600682429199.jpg (3840x4315, 969.79K)

>that looks much better than normal TAA.
But TLOU2 looks like blurry shit just like every other game using TAA.

maybe on the base PS4.

Even on PS4 Pro it looks extremely blurry, especially those daytime forest sections with the horrible blown-out bloom.

I will promise you it won't look like this on PC on the highest settings

Everything in RDR2 looks like absolute shit up close.

The texture quality is fucking awful and most of the assets are garbage straight out of their indian sweatshop.

Attached: quality.png (1920x1080, 3.36M)

NINTENDO

>Bullshots 2077

Wait till the games actually out retard. Devs knows for downgrades out the ass

didn't seem that way to me. at least compared to other games like RE engine resident evils.

Nah

Attached: Red Dead Redemption 2 2020-09-07 11_33_19 PM.jpg (3840x2160, 2.48M)

Cool lie

Attached: IMG_20200331_083344.jpg (1920x1080, 259.96K)

No, console priority and lazy cashgrabbing jew devs are holding shit back
Why waste time developing something phenomenal when you know millions of retards will eat up CoD 420 without hesitation and you make bank?

can I run RDR2?

Attached: specs.png (795x471, 44.54K)

Go and wander into the saloon in valentine, take a picture of any NPC up close, take a picture of any random prop up close.

I'll wait.

Attached: Trash.png (1920x1080, 3.23M)

no

Attached: Ghost of Tsushima_20200719140713.png (1920x1080, 3.22M)

that looks bad

Not the person you're replying to, but I see this screenshot was taken in online, where the graphics are definitely downgraded. How does it look in single player?

>he thinks that looks good

Attached: 1593436331175.jpg (700x628, 193.99K)

Peaked no, diminishing returns, yes

Yes, very well by all accounts. Probably need to tweak games settings though

Probably but why would you want to either way? The game is monotonous tripe.

Rdr2 is the best looking game out so far but unfortunately the gameplay is utter shizen

Looks exactly the same, the textures and asset quality are fucking awful up close, the game was absolutely never meant to be played in first person, the trees/bushes are especially bad as well.

Rockstar squirrel

Attached: 20200720_092131.jpg (1280x720, 141.91K)

It's a shame that the game has auto-aim, or whatever it is that makes it so easier to shoot targets. Would be much more exciting and fun if the shooting was clumsier. I wonder if there's a mod for that.

*photomode squirrel

PS4 exclusive squirrels

Attached: IMG_20191113_151847.jpg (1280x720, 154.8K)

They haven't peaked, but it's been a case of diminishing returns for a while now.

Attached: WATCH_DOGS_22020-1-25-17-36-31.jpg (2560x1440, 655.69K)

Snoy is so cheap

Absolutely not. Show me a single game that is indistinguishable from reality graphically and then ask that question.

seething chud