Eats 90% of your GPU to look slightly darker

>eats 90% of your GPU to look slightly darker
why do they keep pushing this meme tech?

Attached: file.png (1418x798, 1.7M)

Bad example. It is the bleeding edge of computer rendering technology

Attached: comparison.jpg (1920x1080, 261.57K)

shader packs can already do that

Not a very good example when you can get shaders packs that make the game look miles better than on the left.

Here

Attached: ye.jpg (3840x2160, 971.33K)

Forcing it on to retard early adopters is how all tech gets better, user. Raytracing is a much better way to light scenes overall and will give you certain things that other rendering techniques can't deliver without a huge overhead, like real time reflections and light bounce (which are essentially the same thing with real light) ... the only problem is that it's hugely expensive to run. The more that early adopters can beta test this tech now the better it will be when it's affordable, and the kinks have been ironed out for the rest of us in 6 years.

Attached: 1583167321429.jpg (1200x1026, 332.66K)

No they cant. They get close but they don't do full multi bounce lighting and reflections due to being just a software solution and needing to at least run at a playable framerate.

>why do they keep pushing this meme tech?
because virtually everyone in CG research and applied CG is tired of rasterization bullshit so the meme tech is pushed until the hardware is finally viable so that we can dump a good deal of the terrible rasterization hacks into the garbage and use less efficient but less hacky ray tracing instead

this

It may not look like much now but if everyone gets behind it and keeps pouring money into it the payoff will be huge down the line

Jewish pupil on the far right

It was a meme, but now it's very nice looking and functional even without DLSS. Cope AMD fag.

>Meme tech
Does OP eat glue covered dicks?

>disable grain filter
>disable bloom
>disable motion blur
>disable depth of field


>RTX


I dunno chief, might disable this gimmick too.

Attached: V5IEXnT.png (4000x2235, 1.38M)

every modern game looks like shit with all those filters turned off, at this point i'm trying to get used to playing with them. I fear that in the future we won't be able to turn them off.

>ITT retards who don't understand global illumination

>those shadows on the right one
kek

you gotta admit motion blur kinda sucks tho that shit be making me dizzy if there's too much.

A little motion blur isn't that bad actually like if it's short. Some games allow you to adjust it like that and others just flat out say ON/OFF which is retarded now that it is current year.

Attached: krelianclowns.png (210x199, 64.94K)

>he can't afford a new cutting edge GPU to render the game at it's best
you are a literal pleb, you poor mother fucker. Get a job.

this
the radeon 5700 is less than 1/4th of my paycheck and I literally make minimum wage. I don't even work a great paying job and I could easily afford one. I could have a completely new computer built in 3 months tops as well as paying all my bills.

The only people crying about performance are NEETs and turbo poorfags.

Thank you for being an early adopter and funding this tech through its infancy. I will wait and buy a new GPU when raytracing has more practical applications.

It's not even that it eats performance, it's also just implemented poorly in games. I've seen people say "it's always better because it's based on how lighting really works" but it's still the developer deciding if shit is too shiny.
Need a lot more time in the oven. RTX is for DLSS right now, that should be the focus.

Is Quake RTX fully path-traced?

I've recently been keeping grain filter in because it fixes color banding.

>every modern game looks like shit with all those filters turned off
Caring more about graphics than gameplay. Please kys zoomer.

Attached: 1598891585006.png (810x793, 576.34K)

>I don't know what the fuck I'm talking about
Every thread

Zig Forums is less tech literate than the average grandparent, you shouldn't be surprised. This is the same board that unironically believed the "HDR" in Half-Life 2 was the same thing on OLED TVs.

Yes, and you can enable 1:1 reflection resolution and 3 ray bounces in the settings, hence why even on a 3090 craters to about ~40 with it (At least, mine did but I did not play beyond the third level, The Frag Pipe. Might get even worse past there, someone else would have to confirm.

what is global illumination?

>"Look we can now render shadows so dark you can't fucking see anything!"
*cranks up the gamma so I can actually play*

The modeling of shifted light transmission on object bounces, for example light bouncing off a green surface carrying a green tint onto whatever it further illuminates. Also really makes dark, dimly lit areas look very good.

It's probably the single most realistic gain you can make to lighting in games, every spec of light in the real world does this, and it's very obvious when it's not present in games. I'd take GI specifically over the RT shadows and reflections any day.

You have no idea what you're talking about.

>buys RTX card just to play control
>It's a shit game

Attached: 1602900210243.jpg (400x400, 119.66K)

>control
>shit game
you have bottom of the fucking mariana trench shit taste if you think control is a shit game.

Doesn't really matter when new games are garbage.

well user, tell us about your videogame taste, huh?

RTX is another meme pushed by retards who don't know what the fuck do to jew their customers, and is working because monkeys like shiny stuff
We had Bloom back in 2007 being the cancer
Then chromatic aberration like in 2013
Now this shit

Stop using fucking minecraft no one is falling for it.