How's that 3080 treating you NvidiChads?

>he didnt wait for the inevitable 3080ti
lmao

A bit in some scenarios. Either way, a card that's the same/slightly better than a 2080ti for less than half the price is pretty awesome. Big navi gets shown off tomorrow though, probably worth tuning in as AMD typically targets consumers with smaller budgets using competitive pricing.

4k is a meme, get you a 1440p panel.

I'm waiting for the 3080 Ti, I'm not satisfied with the fact that the 3080 only has 10gb of RAM, I'm hoping for at least 12gb, preferably 16gb.

I'm still rocking 1080p out of a GTX 1080, it even runs my Valve Index well enough, I wish I had something a bit beefier, I started dropping frames at a few parts of Half Life Alyx but I've gotten used to VR enough that it didn't make me sick at all.

>3080ti
>not waiting for the inevitable 4080
You'll be waiting forever with that attitude, user. Just buy it when you have the cash and need an upgrade. Don't worry about the what-ifs or coulda-beens.

Redpill me on 1080p vs 1440p vs 4k

1080 vs 1440 doesn't seem like it would be a big enough jump to really matter.

It's going to be 12 because of the bus. It can't be 16 because it would have a 256 bit bus and that would be shit unless you have the cache system like AMD put into big navi which Ampere doesn't have.

Meant to say "sometimes I wish I had something a bit beefier though" but VR is the only thing that makes me feel that way, since the Index is about 1440p, I still run any flat game at 1080p just fine on the higher settings, I'm only really wanting to upgrade because I want to enjoy RTX effects.

If my 1070ti and i5 8400 can't run cyberpunk at 1080p 60fps, I'll upgrade. Otherwise see you when the 4000 series launches faggots.

Attached: 1585521697709.jpg (1200x903, 132.14K)

>he doesnt know about the ti
oh nononononono

I was going to say "doesn't the 3090 have 16gb" but then I realized that fucking thing has 24gb, jesus.

1440p is 4k, no?

>raving about having to use DLSS
LMAO

On a 27" panel from 2-3 feet away (typical desktop specs) 1440 and 4k are basically identical. Both are a noticable improvement on 1080 though (1440 is almost 2x more pixels than 1080).

>1080 vs 1440 doesn't seem like it would be a big enough jump to really matter.
Thats EXACTLY what i thought until i got a 2k monitor, then it changed my mind entirely. 2k is fucking amazing. Wouldnt ever go to 4k until cards let us go to 144hz/4k, which currently is just not fuckin possible on new games and not many of those monitors exist anyways. Take the 1440p pill.

3080s don't fucking exist.

Im fine with my 2070 super as of now. Maybe next year i’ll upgrade idk

Just jumped to a 27"1440p panel and believe me the difference is massive. Being able to see individual leather cracks and glove threads in games like Modern Warfare or all the little scratches on the SSG in Doom Eternal sold me instantly. It also won't wreck your frames like 4k if you have a decent rig.

Main thing for me is I like high refresh rates, and you won't get those with 4k. I also like playing stuff like Overwatch and Valorant and with 4k you really need a 32" or bigger to get a noticeably better experience, making competitive shooters a pain when you have so much screen real estate.

If you have an electronics store you can do comparisons at or know someone with a 1440p panel, give it a go and see if it suits you.

1080 is 1920x1080, which is about 2 million pixels.
1440 is 2560x1440, which is about 3.7 million pixels.
4k is 3840x2160, over 8 million pixels.

10 gVRAM is a non-issue even at 4k.

What 3080?

It do

Attached: 3080exists.jpg (4032x1960, 3.28M)

t.

Attached: 3080.png (650x136, 11.54K)

>Redpill me on 1080p vs 1440p vs 4k
1080p = kinda hard for me to go back to now, wouldn't do over 24"
1440p = 27" sweet spot
4k = for 32" or bigger. Might notice it at 27" but the difference isn't worth the performance hit/cost/scaling wonkiness.
>1080 vs 1440 doesn't seem like it would be a big enough jump to really matter.
why? it's almost double the resolution.
of we want to be technical the bottom two are wrong.
2k is actually 2048×1080
4k is 4096x2160
I get UHD is called 4k as colloquial. But i never understood calling 1440p "2k" it's really 2.5k.

literally me
Are you running a ryzen 3600 rn too?

Any leafs get them from Canada Computers or Memory express yet?
put a deposit down at the former, wait list at the latter. both on the Asus tuff but nothing.

>But i never understood calling 1440p "2k" it's really 2.5k.
Same it fucking rustles my jimmies every time someone says that. 2K/4K have always referred to Cinemascope horizontal resolution. If anything 2K is closer to 1080p traditional displays

Ordered on release and hoping it arrives before Cyberpunk comes out, not sure who will win at this rate. Suffering with my 980ti for now

yeah.
Like I said.
You take 4k dcp masters. Home release you release it at UHD resolution. it's equivalent, and the colloquial fits.
But 1440p has absolutely nothing to do with cinema standards

worth the upgrade to the 3080?

Attached: Untitled.png (511x337, 26.49K)

I never said 2k. As for 4k, that's just what it's called my guy. You've gotta accept that most people refer to UHD as 4k because that's the resolution consumers actually deal with.

>and at 1080p it's the best option of the 3000 lineup
for now, the 3060ti is still releasing Q1 2021 so that's probably gonna be 1080 king.

maybe if you can get one before the 40xx series will be out mid next year.

Bottom line is whether or not you're getting the performance you want from your pc. If yes, then wait. If no, upgrade.

You should add another 16gigs of ram user, it's really cheap rn.

I'm using 24" right now and I'm not sure about getting anything bigger, the two of these monitors take up a lot of space on my desk as it is, would it still be worth looking at 1440p?

sorry, I read your post at the same time as
and had a mind meld.

I would say yes. But not as much as a night and day.
there is also other important stuff. Variable refresh (freesync/gsync) panel type, colour reproduction and hdr(shit on most monitors atm)

My 27" 1440p hasn't been an issue vs. my old 24" and I sit fairly close. Just turn up the UI scaling in windows to 125%.

3090 is treating me pretty good on 4K here boys. Glad to be on the side of the gigachads.

been thinking about it, especially when chrome and firefox and discord and steam and epic and runescape and uplay and spotify eat up 8gb at idle. I'd probably just buy 4x16 since my budget has gone way up recently.

that's the thing, I'm still pulling 144fps at 1080p on almost every game at mid to low(ish) settings but I'd really love 144fps on high. I know a lot of it is CPU bound but I have an 8700k

>i5 8400
Even with settings lowered, I doubt you will be able to hit 60FPS consistently in an open world game like that. CPU matters alot more at 1080p