Same franchise

>same franchise

Attached: Eli6mitXEAUi8Pt-tile.jpg (810x400, 102.34K)

yes, the baby is in the same franchise as its family, which i assume is present with it for the photograph

Attached: Screenshot 2020-10-30 003104.png (738x653, 160.65K)

MOOOOOOOOT

MOOOOOOOOT

M000000000T

Mootmind
I miss that one guy
Moot

MOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOT

wtf is happening

Attached: Capture (4).png (841x467, 584.1K)

That baby better be cut

Who?

summoning the parrot

>Plebs STILL say Baby 2 is superior to Baby 1

Attached: 1529541988572.png (320x274, 102.13K)

what gets me is the people who still claim the shake strat doesn't work

MOOOOOOIIIIIOOOOOOOOOT

HIROSHIMOOOOOOOT

I agree, babby 3 was when the lineage turned to shit

Reminder
Baby 1 will always be superior and more loved than Baby 2,3 and forward

Ask your parents

HIROSHIMAAAAAAAAAAA FIX YOUR FUCKING SITE

Mr. Poole please assist.

All things considered B4BY was a good reinvention of the series, I don't care what anyone says.

Look, lets be real here: Baby 2 stepped up on 1. Yes, 1 IS A CLASSIC and is the founding title of the series, nobody's denying it's good, but Baby 2 worked on what 1 laid out and added more to it. It's just a matter of fact dude.

Attached: 12.jpg (604x453, 73.28K)

franchise for babies

Baby 2 days are so insufferable, why can't they just come to terms with the fact that baby 1 and to a lesser extent baby portable are superior.

But what about
Baby (2007)

Like Nagasaki, Hiroshimoot strikes again

Attached: NEO TRANNY BEAM.webm (1254x616, 624.8K)

i dont get it

Was the other way around for me...
Baby 1 was "the mistake".

>baby's first thumbnail swap

Attached: 1603880194336.jpg (1252x704, 122.7K)

If two images are posted at the exact same time, only one will have a thumbnail created while the other will use what it thinks is its thumbnail but is actually the other's.

Attached: Alan Wakes American Nightmare.gif (670x925, 908.12K)

GOO GOO GA GA
*shits diaper*