Far Cry 2 vs Far Cry 3

Which one is better, gameplay and story wise?

Attached: 2 vs 3.jpg (1197x1373, 650.02K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/88PHHEziQtU
youtu.be/Hb7z-I6TSlU
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

Far Cry 3.

YOU HAVE THE INSANITY OF A MANITY

3 if only because I remember the guns feeling better.

Attached: 1573286425865.jpg (960x300, 32.33K)

I don't remember anything of FC2's because every mission felt the same and I kinda just started to zone out when listening to the handlers.

Far Cry 2 on both accounts. However, you're comparing dog shit to donkey shit.

They're both good in different ways, 3's popularity wasn't unjustified, and 2's resurgence wasn't either.

Far Cry 3 for gameplay, even if it feels bland nowadays because it's been copied so much.
Far Cry 2 has a great story and themes though, it's really underrated. The Jackal tapes are absolute KINO

3 certainly.
2 felt bland as fuck.

All the voice overs in far cry 2 sounded like they were sped up to 1.5x speed or something. everyone talks too fast and doesnt pause

I heard they were sped up to save on disk space or something. No idea why they'd do that though, sounds stupid.

Far cry 3 no contest.
Only crowbshit retards give a damn about pile of shit that is fc2

if you dont save scum in far cry 2 and use the buddy revive system, the game is pretty immersive. Its basically like a zelda botw where you make your own adventure

3 is better than 2 storywise if you picked the correct ending

3. Zig Forums loves to meme 2 but the game is bland as shit.

Blood Dragon.

>gameplay
3

>story
2

also I would give atmosphere to 2 as well.
my god the fucking gameplay was shit in 2

Objectively 3 but 2 is also great.

I'm going to pull a Zig Forums because I never played 2 but 3 is better and I feel pretty confident in saying that.

2 made me want to become a mercenary in Africa. I didnt get far in 3 because the beginning was cringe, am I missing out?

Far Cry 2 has an attention to details that is still unmatched nowadays. The physics is awesome, the immersion is total.
3 has Vaas though.

youtu.be/88PHHEziQtU

I think I ended up enjoying it more because I played it on the PS3 first. If I had played it on PC I would be constantly quicksaving but on consoles you have to go to save spots which makes the game more immersive as you've said but it also adds much more tension because you're constantly on alert so you don't get killed and lose your progress.

FarCry 5 unironically

Far Cry 3 easily. Far Cry 2's Africa and main theme were based af tho.

3's second half is like a wet fart, but the game's gameplay is better overall.
2's a better game otherwise, and the mod support definitely helps.

The hell are you saying? The intro of FC3 was terrific.

youtu.be/Hb7z-I6TSlU

That wasn't the question dipshit

>mod support definitely helps
All you need is a mod to decrease the enemy respawn and tone down the AI vehicle chase behavior and the game is perfect

Don't forget the forced controller makes aiming harder and therefore Rambo approaches less viable.

3 is insanely fun when you're on your own, shame the story missions railroad you like a bitch
Also Vas is an absolutely awful villain so I understand

only issue with 2 is it needed more wildlife

True, but I think that even on PC the gunplay discourages that somewhat. It reminds me of the STALKER games where you can be insanely accurate if you take your time but if you try to rush in you're not gonna hit anything and you'll get your ass kicked.

3 is a complete product through and through. 2 is definitely cool in a lot of respects but it's incredibly monotonous and unsatisfying in the end.

3, however. the part where you've killed Vaas and travel to Hoyt's island in Willis's felt amazing. I feared the game might end around Vaas's death, but holy shit it was just the midpoint. they brilliantly just keep kicking on a new gear until the very end of the game. the missions you pull off with Sam are fucking ridiculous. it's truly an experience.