OH NO NO NO

OH NO NO NO
dsogaming.com/pc-performance-analyses/source-code-watch-dogs-legion-leaked-560gb/

Attached: 20201103_104509.jpg (1080x1151, 609.92K)

Other urls found in this thread:

freedos-project.blogspot.com/2018/09/practical-thoughts-on-ms-dos-source-code.html
wiki.winehq.org/Developer_FAQ#Who_can.27t_contribute_to_Wine.3F
twitter.com/Dolphin_Emu/status/1257051968045899776
egregornews.com/publish/ubisoft
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

Who gives a fuck

poggers

Is it buildable?

Leaked wither though?

560gb for beards that look like a failed early 2000s MMO and muh ray tracing reflections
l o l

Attached: dm19.jpg (254x182, 8.49K)

How exactly does this affect anyone anywhere?

Commodore Plus/4 port when?

Access to the source code of a game basically gives you developer access to it.
It's Watch Dogs so yeah, nobody gives a fuck, but if it happened to a real game it would be monumental. A dedicated/autistic enough person or team could basically remake the game as they wanted.

It means you could recreate a free legal version of the game. Like DOOM.

Its not legal if the devs didnt release the source themselves

lmao you are dumb as fuck

>It's not fake, but it's an incomplete dev build from 2019 to early 2020. 99% of the files in the folder require special tools and a login to ubisoft's servers even when attempting to launch the game. A lot of stuff during launch is acquired and sent remotely so anyone with half a brain should stay the f away from something like this.
>This may be paradise to an asset hoarder, but for cracking purposes there is no point wasting time on a very old, WIP Legion build with even more custom DRM.
>Some of Ubisoft's tools are also included in this leak, so it's like a 2 for 1 deal and there is some source code, but most of the game files seem to be compiled or would require special in-house tools, like the Map Editor with login requirement.

Would be interesting to look at the assets tho

I wasn't expecting that to happend.

Read it again slowly. A free legal recreation. You can look at the code and reverse engineer the code and then use it to recreate the game. You can create a free legal open source version of the game.

>weights

Attached: 1541307175680.jpg (545x526, 49.47K)

>560GB
so that includes all of the textures and models right? right??

Attached: 1588363971780.jpg (211x239, 7.41K)

560gb of bullshit, seriously how the fuck can it be that big?

If you look at the source code it becomes illegal. A decompilation is already shady.

>so anyone with half a brain should stay the f away from something like this
so stupid people should stay away from it? got it

Unreal is like 20 gb but can produce games as small as 50mb.

cool, when is the crack though?
trying to fill the days till ps5 and I really dont feel like buying it

Where were you when it was announced next gen consoles could only have two games installed at a time lol

Almost as good as YandereDev code

Attached: 1851029.685_image.png (1053x1500, 843.01K)

>If you look at the source code it becomes illegal.

Wrong. You can look at it and reverse engineer it. 100% legal my friend.

Who care this game???

560GB is actually too lightweight.
>Speaking in 2015 regarding a possible re-release of the game via Steam or GOG.com, Louis Castle explained the source code and assets were lost when Westwood moved its studio from Las Vegas to Los Angeles, thus making a re-release or a HD remaster impossible. Even if the code was found, to restore almost a terabyte of assets, whether for new pre-rendered backdrops or full real-time 3D, would cost tens of millions of dollars, making a re-release as unlikely as a sequel.
This is about Blade Runner, a 1997 video game.

Could someone competent recreate it to have better performance?

>thinking any of this matters
For years embedded devices companies have been using open source software illegally by not following GPL's license terms. People will dissect, modify and reuse your code and not give a fuck about whether it's legal or not, the burden of proving they did it and bringing it to court is on you.

how did they even store that much info back then wtf

Retard.

>My understanding from lawyers who have explained it to me (I am not a lawyer) is that you can be "tainted" by knowledge of proprietary source code, under US law and under similar laws agreed to by partner countries. [[[So anyone who read or studied the source code to MS-DOS 1.1 or 2.0 as it was previously released via the Computer History Museum license was not allowed to contribute to FreeDOS afterwards]]]. We posted several notices to this effect on the FreeDOS website and elsewhere.
>But this source code release of MS-DOS 1.25 and 2.0 uses the MIT License, which is not only a recognized open source software license, but compatible with the GNU GPL. This means the "taint" concern is effectively lifted.
freedos-project.blogspot.com/2018/09/practical-thoughts-on-ms-dos-source-code.html

>Who can't contribute to Wine?
>Some people cannot contribute to Wine because of potential copyright violation. This would be anyone who has seen Microsoft Windows source code (stolen, under an NDA, disassembled, or otherwise). There are some exceptions for the source code of add-on components (ATL, MFC, msvcrt); see the next question.

>Can I contribute if I've only seen the source to ATL, MFC, and/or msvcrt?
>Yes, but not on those components. Also please state on the mailing list that you have seen the source to these and that you will not contribute to them. You are free to contribute to other areas of the Wine source code.
wiki.winehq.org/Developer_FAQ#Who_can.27t_contribute_to_Wine.3F

>We cannot use anything of any sort from a leak. In fact, we can't even look at it. Dolphin is only legal because we are clean room reverse engineering the GameCube and Wii. If we use anything from a leak, Dolphin is no longer legal and Nintendo *will* shut us down.
twitter.com/Dolphin_Emu/status/1257051968045899776

No, it's just the code for the game.
Holy fucking shit are they coding in scratch lmfao.

Attached: fourhundredthousandkeks.png (256x384, 167.2K)

this stuff gets compiled down to c++ like blueprints in unreal.

>Source code and assets
Of course that combined is gonna be larger

It could give insight on Denuvo shit, so some people do give a shit.

Any magnets or something?

You'd get sued into the ground doing that if it was a project that was actually worth suing over, by the way.

>This may be paradise to an asset hoarder
I'd like to have it but 560GB for Ubitrash ain't worth the space

>difficulty is literally just a multiplier
lol

>What are legal statements

Retard. If they admit to looking at it they would get sued. NOW FUCKING READ WHAT IM SAYING.

You can look at it and reverse engineer the code and no one will know you looked at it.

Yes but it's unproveable. You can't use the code it's just legal to reverse engineer the code.

We can basically build a Leftie America Simulator and show zoomers how bad things can become if commies win and keep waking them up.

egregornews.com/publish/ubisoft urgh its only half of what they have, no engine source code either

>let's throw years and years of progress to the trash because I'm a retarded fuck that thinks it's worthy it to risk it all for some minor improvements
Die.