Layton Puzzles

none of them??????????????????

these games look really fun but i don't want to prove just how retarded i am

Attached: 1604162143345.jpg (750x731, 49.91K)

That is indeed correct! Sometimes it can be hard to figure 3d shapes in your head huh?

Attached: 1602552192285.png (1080x1920, 840.88K)

You should give it a go! It doesn't matter if you get some answers wrong, or even if it takes you days to solve 1 puzzle.

You could always reset the console before saving to get the full picarats but who does that haha

Attached: 1582059353928.png (1080x1920, 2.46M)

Attached: tile mastery.png (396x299, 4.82K)

Impressive work!

Attached: 1573883792348.png (276x426, 120.55K)

I'd guess C because it has an odd number of edges

c?
>he decides to clean his place while doing the least amount of work possible
planning is hard, if he was truly lazy he would bruteforce it

Attached: 1595801237315.jpg (540x390, 34.25K)

F

That's correct!

Attached: 1580595228490.png (1080x1920, 1.84M)

So, anons, what's your favorite type of conundrum? Maths? Pattern recognition? Sliding puzzles?

Attached: 1585841245832.png (1080x1960, 3.45M)

>Make a square
>Answer makes a cube
Fucking stupid
The real answer is 1

not even gonna do this one but surely someone lives in floor -2 or some shit like that

This is what I hate about Layton.
Half the puzzles just resolve around thinking what the obvious is and then subverting it, clicking on something else or low balling your projected solution.
It becomes an excercise in spotting the trick.

And sliding tiles.

am i fucking stupid? why do i need more than one tile to make a square? the tile's already a square????? why is making a cube the right answer??? what relevance do the measurements have at all??

>am i fucking stupid?
Yes.

nevermind its 9 8 7 6

Attached: layton.gif (512x384, 496.86K)

4. It says square, not cube.

A:6
B:8
C:7
D:9

That's not even a cube, it's an oblong.

It never said it was a cube brainlets.

square

Attached: 1580279214061.jpg (185x185, 23.75K)

20x24 is not a square

>am i fucking stupid?
Maybe
>why do i need more than one tile to make a square? the tile's already a square?????
It is not the original tile is 10x12
>why is making a cube the right answer??? what relevance do the measurements have at all?
The simple solution is to make a square of the tiles on the flat side, you can do this by making a square that by a 10 by 12 tile square, the end measurements would be 120x120 and would require 120 tiles. You could also use 5 by 6 but both are inefficient.
By using the .5 and 10 sides to make your square you stack them 20 by 1 and the resulting rectangular prism has a cube side.
Make sense?

yeah
this

Attached: tile mastery 2.png (760x638, 6.23K)

That's right! Good job.

Very interesting proposals, the Professor would be proud.

Attached: 1579200444833.png (1080x1960, 3.63M)

Isn't it 5? 1 horizontal, then 4 stacked vertically along a 12-side to make a 12x12 square on the bottom?

Even the guy in the picture knows this is a worthless solution.

Let's take a crack at this one.

Attached: 1588776049282.png (1080x2176, 2.71M)

That's an angular donut you silly goose.