What is the future for his games?

I know it's easy to sit here and go "Man, this franchise has so much untapped potential" as I'm sure game developing is an arduous process that isn't so simple and straightforward but God damn. I know Rayman is hardly a flop but can we really blame Ubisoft for seeing Assassin's Creed as a more reliable source of income? Is Rayman just too unpredictable and risky of a franchise to waste time and resources on? Would advertising him more help? Since they like open worlds so much, why not dabble in it for Rayman? As long as it had fun platforming I don't see how it could go wrong.

Attached: e37a68afa33765c8e6459309aeb1b83c.png (719x507, 853.61K)

I....i just want a hug from globox...i want that he look into my eyes and tell me that there will be better times for Ubisoft again......

Attached: Globox_dance.gif (173x178, 67.68K)

Honestly none of that, the games have always been profitable. The problem is that the series just doesn't move AssCree numbers. Which is fine on a studio level, but unacceptable on a shareholder level. Ubisoft big company. Big company sells much games. Big company shoul sell 10 million Raymans. That's the logic that runs in AAA these days. It's not that Rayman can't turn a profit, it's just that if it doesn't make exorbitant amounts of money, Ubi doesn't care.

Man of culture right here.

Attached: A5F8DE63-1876-4443-B316-81CA0143263B.jpg (386x562, 48.11K)

user, the BG&E2 team were pitching a fit over not being allowed to design the game with AC template shit. What does that tell you?

this reminds me of an article where some activision investors were upset call of duty black ops 3 or 4 (whichever was it) didn't sell well enough. despite selling like 30 million units or something

The same Activision that claims record profits and immediately sacks hundreds of people.

Always a treat to see new Ly art.

Attached: Eli2Q0XW0AAa6zT.jpg (2168x2357, 415.61K)

she's underrated

Then I'll just have to keep commissioning her.

I'm surprised they have not remade 2, 3 and M/Multiplayer.

Attached: CDI Reanimated Zelda 1.png (215x313, 79.8K)

Last I recall the HD version of 3 actually removed, rather than add things.

another sad rayman bump

Attached: Rayman trapped in Mobile Hell.png (796x599, 654.24K)

I don't know if this or gacha hell is worse. At least he wasn't whored out to the chinese like Might & Magic.

>future
Hah! Good one milord!

Rayman 3 wouldn't survive if it was released today and it makes me sad

That's because 3D platformers are relics of a bygone era and nobody cares about them these days. The gaming landscape has evolved over needing these kind of games.

>play her racing minigame in revolution as kid
>always thought she was kinda cute
>somehow start getting ahead of her
>she starts sprinting on all fours to get ahead
>thatskindahot.png
>get obsessed with her for a while
I don't get it
what does that even say about me?

Like what though? All I see is the attachment for sim shit, multiplayer and and dlc addon shit

All of which are more complex and have more thought put behind them. "Sim shit" requires thinking, multiplayer games are full of challenge, even DLC addons can be interesting. None of these apply to 3D platformers, the bastard children everyone jumped ship from as soon as possible.

That you have good taste.

Attached: 1600995231239.png (555x901, 93.28K)

You have good taste

ancel left ubisoft, enjoy your yearly open world garbage games

>None of these apply to 3D platformers
Except A Hat in Time asshole. The problem is that execs aren't making the modern jump properly because they are too inept to market right. Indie IPs do because they are real modern gamers that evolve probably

>Except A Hat in Time
I'm sorry, I don't play tranny games and most sane people don't, either.