AC Valhalla looks horrible on XSX

AC Valhalla looks horrible on XSX.

Attached: EmKZMOQX0AA5yNk.jpg (3840x2160, 2.31M)

I think that looks pretty good

See an optometrist.

AC Valhalla looks horrible on everything. It’s so unopened unoptimized that the 3090 can’t do 4k 60 and I was watching a gameplay video earlier and the animations are still the same shit ones they’ve been using since Origins. It’s so bad that Layla’s own hair clips through her character model in cutscenes.

It doesn't have Raytracing so everything is either too dark or washed out, unless you manage to stand directly in the sun to take a screenshot

Attached: Assassin's Creed Valhalla Screenshot 2020.11.09 - 22.29.44.64.png (1920x1080, 3.39M)

>muh graphics
Can this industry standard please die?

What does it look like on PS4?

It's a Ubisoft game, what did you expect? It's running on the same engine as Origins and Odyssey

even if they had raytracing it would just be reflections because Ubisoft doesn't want to go all in on it yet.

>everything looks absolutely pathetic compared to RDR2 even on low settings
Those characters look like cavemen.

Are you sure this isn't the shitty caveman farcry game Ubisoft made?

>new gen is based on amazing graphics
>muh teraflops, muh ssd, 4k...
>articles saying they are better than a 1500$€ PC
>game comes out, looks mediocre
>tour post

I think this too. If it either wasn't open world or didn't have AC in the name is probably take a punt on it.

far cry games always look good

Friendly reminder to not go and look for Viking information because bad people will sneakily recruit you with their ideas. Always have a closed mind unless you want to gain incorrect viewpoints.

Attached: sneakyvikings.png (887x518, 55.06K)

>buy game
>take money
>don't have game
Sometimes Ubisoft is just incredible anons.

The same, but worse.

Like shit of course.

Attached: acv-4-s2.png (1920x1080, 3.24M)

>3840x2160
>60fps
It actually looks better than Odyssey to be H with u famallonni

Attached: 18KHqfc.jpg (1000x750, 80.9K)

>overweight gamers
Oh my god
>with beards
NO!!

I thought these people were against "bodyshaming", but apparently being fat or having a beard is still bad?

The character model looks pretty shit, and everything past the first hill they're on looks awful. AAA games shouldn't have this issue at all by now.

Still looks 10x better than Breath of the Wild.

Gamedevs should unironically go for a stylized look instead of realistic graphics.

Attached: HLA.jpg (2962x4235, 3.53M)

fpbp. Draw distance isn't too great but lighting wise it's solid and the colors are really nice. Definitely not "horrible"

How much worse does it look in ps4.5?

welcome to Ubisoft games, something that looks like a 2014-15 game will still have performance issues to the point that even the highest of PC hardware can't get a stable 60 FPS on highest settings because everything is fuuuuucked.

Look at those fucking flowers.png are you serious?

Attached: maxresdefault.jpg (1280x720, 108.96K)

Okay but Zig Forums always likes to tout how they don't care about graphics but then at the same time they want to complain about them under the guise that you just described. If you don't care about graphics then you don't care about them, it's as simple as that. Pretending to care just so you can complain or complaining because other people care is just retarded

NI-

GGER

XboneX comes out
>haha look at that, the games all run at 4K30fps
4K60fps Xbox Sex comes out
>Haha this is next gen? the graphics barely look better!

this is skyrim-tier

Isn't it crossgen?

user... I...

Attached: BotW.png (1920x1080, 3.72M)

The worst part of these games is blatantly wrong garments. Hell, most are entirely fictional and don't fit into any time period.

Attached: ElSYRjyXgAYE-z4.png (540x702, 253.79K)

washed out grey shit

HIRE THIS MAN!!

wheres the style in that screenshot

lmao

unironically true.