Post a game series where only 1 game is good. Ill start with a ez one

Old good new bad

>likes 3
>hates 5
>when 5 is better than 3 in every way that matters to an action game

DMC1 is still my personal favorite because I played it the day of release so I'm a bit biased, but 5 is easily the best Itsuno directed DMC game. Go back to replay 3 on DMD and tell me how much you love it, that game was a fucking joke in terms of balance and you can tell absolutely no one on the dev team bothered to play the game on DMD. I still don't know how they allowed Fallen to get passed testing.

So 4 is ok to hate but not 5?
Besides, I'm not getting into this. Every time I say why it always deteriorates into name calling and the online equivalent of arguing with someone with their eyes closed and fingers in their ears shouting lalala you're a fagot.

3 has better story. Maybe better difficulty. Maybe better pacing. 5 has better gameplay. Better enemies. Bosses are mixed.

I can see 3 being better than 5. But not so much so that you would hate 5 if you loved 3.

I like 4. But it’s really only half a game. And some missions are tedious af. I can understand why someone would dislike it in good faith.

4 is half a game. 5 is fan service but fun

3 and 5 are good, but 3 is the only one I would put close to 3. 5 is basically a proper version of 4, but once again with no exciting new additions like styles and weapon-swaps were in 3.

Attached: 1555229698316.gif (960x540, 1.74M)

This it the dumbest argument I've ever heard. I love RE4 but hate 5. Are you going to ask how can you hate 5 when you love 4?

Not him but that’s an even dumber response

That probably sounded smarter in your head

That's because you're both retarded. Or possibly the same person but you forgot you already responded on account of being retarded. A simple matter of both being basically the same game to play but one lacks the basic fundamental that made the other great.

>Kamiyafags (DMC 1)
>muh Dante design autists (DMC 2)
>Nostalgiafaggots (DMC 3)
>Comboautists (DMC 4)
>Dontefags (DmC)
>nuDMCfags (DMC 5)

which one's the worst? which one's the most tolerable?

>Bosses are mixed
Less than half of the bosses in 3 are good. The only bad bosses in 5 are Nidhogg and Seated Urizen.

2 is good

>absolutely no one on the dev team bothered to play the game on DMD
I'd say this applies to every single game in the series past the first one.
5 has it's fair share of cancerous enemies too.

Attached: Teleporting nigger of Rank clipping.jpg (800x450, 47.46K)

What fundamentals? I can see liking RE4 better aesthetically or for the campier tone, but the gameplay and how the games are designed are identical with the small addition of coop

Very based

Attached: pd.jpg (320x220, 16.49K)

Judeccas are the only enemies in 5 that are as frustrating as a good chunk of 3's, and that's only because it's an enemy that attacks your physically but is allowed to attack while it's offscreen while also being a summoner-type.

My opinion:
>Hell Vanguard
Fine; really just a regular enemy
>Cerberus
Good
>Gigapede
Lame
>Agni & Rudra
Great
>Heart of Leviathan
Bad
>Nevan
Great
>Beowulf
Great
>Geryon
Okay? I know I’m in the minority here. But I like getting on top of the chariot. First phase is boring but short.
>Lady
Lame
>Doppelgänger
Lame
>Arkham
Godawful; I can win only with cheesing and it still feels like luck plays a role with the little shit leeches
>Jester
Mildly fun in the bullet hellish section but mostly lame
>Vergil
GOAT except for Vergil 1, which is the easiest boss in the game except on DMD

Vs

>Qliphoth Roots
Lame but it’s just a tutorial
>Goliath
Great
>Artemis
Great
>Nidhogg
Lame because V
>Elder Geryon Knight
Worst boss in game especially on DMD
>Gilgamesh
Kinda lame but not as bad as people say
>Proto Angelo / Scudo Angelo
Not a real boss
>Nobody
Not a real boss
>Cavaliere Angelo
Great
>Malphas
Okay but way too easy. First boss I did a no damage run on
>Cerberus
Depends on the phase. Maybe I’m bad, but I hate ice phase
>V’s familiars
I hate this fight
>Urizen
Only standing Urizen is fun; I hate his tentacles
>Vergil
Great

>but the gameplay and how the games are designed are identical
Yeah, if you actually think this then you don't get it. You think the only thing to gameplay is the superficial stuff, the things you can see in a video. If you really think RE4 & 5 play identically then there's not point in talking to you about it.

I don’t think Judecca is too bad because it heavily telegraphs its attacks and then has big openings. You can also do an infinite Devil bringer combo with Nero on it as long as you create one opening.

>t. played only 0

Can you put into words how they play differently besides coop?

nah nigga 1 is good, 3 is great, 4 is ok and 5 is very good

Different user, but the coop is a huge change. Sheva’s AI is so shit that RE5 is really best enjoyed as couch coop.

Because 3 is a full game with a developing character, and actual level design.

5 is 1/3 of a game with 2 environments, hallway levels, and button mashing topped with member berries. There's nothing about 5 that stands out other than the final boss which itself is a copy from DmC. 5 is not a game that had full creative effort poured in. literally soulless.

Sheva is like Ashley but somewhat useful
Sure her AI is shit but she can actually fight back and doesn't need to be tossed in a dumpster or constantly saved

havent played 2 but isnt customizable devil trigger available in 1 as well? The bangle of time makes your devil trigger time stop