It's better than san andreas

it's better than san andreas

Attached: file.png (256x320, 214.44K)

It's grey and brown

in opposite land

and better than san andreas

>watches The Sopranos once

Attached: maxresdefault.jpg (1280x720, 76.27K)

never did is it good

is there a way to play this without GFWL?

If you like your arteries clogged with braciole and overweight italians, then The Sopranos is for you.

yes

GTA 5 redpilled me on the fact that sheer map size means very little. San Andreas pretty much feels like it's as big as 5 despite being less than half the size.
R* was too confident with 5's map size, thinking they wouldn't need to use the tricks SA does to create an illusion of scale.
4 is pretty immaculate. Actual size and the sense of scale are both good.

Attached: XDs0tTZ.jpg (2600x2048, 693.82K)

It’s better than fucking V

>shittier music
>shittier mission variety
>shittier story
>shittier characters
>shittier vehicle selection
>shittier weapons
>no crazy shit like jetpack or airplanes
>no immediate dicking around cheats, have to enter everything into the phone like a faggot
BUT LOOK AT LE WOBBLY PHYSICS AND TANK CARS XDDD

you mad?

5 was only good in first impressions. the opening bank heist, followed by the drive through LS were incredible, but the game just falls apart as it goes on. 4 is definitely better in hindsight. SA is obviously ancient and technologically inferior, but even it has many elements 5 would've benefited from.

Yeah san an is actually shit besides the rpg elements unless you like hood movies

braciole is just pork rolled with spices retard

Online was pretty good though cops n robbers. Modded gta iv was fun fps mode ice enhancer hd texture mods

Sounds like saints row is the game for you, tranny

san andreas doesnt work when you dont have fog blocking the rest of the map 50 ft out, look at the mods that get rid of it, you can see las vegas from the roofs of the grove st cul de sac

It looks fine with the fog, so why remove it?

gta v looks incredibly realistic without any fog

>it's better than
Right off the bat, you're completely wrong. Care to try again?

Why would he be when Rockstar ditched all of the shitty design choices they made with this garbage heap of a game? The only ones I ever see mad are IVtards.

The driving is such shit that I can't justify that statement.

?

Attached: 2678CAD7-8463-42CF-A3C4-0CE3050DA0F4.jpg (738x415, 33.61K)

Nice reading comprehension, my dude.

numbers talk

Attached: trevor.jpg (480x480, 30.34K)

>zoomers who were 10 when it came out are now praising this shit game

Attached: 1604969812959.jpg (1163x2048, 293.53K)

>is it good

bruh do yourself a favour

i have that image with the same filename lol

In some aspects it is better.

thats new yawk, fo' dat ass, you pink and lavendar LA california fuck boi

git summm