Proof that Zig Forumseddit is stuck in the Tortanic mind-set

>even with new animations, the timing of every attack and parry has the exact same frames as the original
>They kept every game mechanic the exact same, including tendencies and item burden
>BUT they added the feature that you can send items, you pick up while burdened, directly to Thomas
I fully agree that most of the re-designs (not all) are worse than the original, but the gameplay is LITERALLy the same, plus the improved handling of item burden.
That means all the things you can shit on this game are purely cosmetic nature. This is without a doubt a big criteria, but it objectively doesn't justify saying shit like "worst game/remake ever made; 0/10 score".
Every single user mindlessly shitting on this game just got exposed.

Attached: 88787.jpg (1172x1500, 338.4K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/9O--CnN056E?t=1540
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

And of course i won't get any serious answer, because drones can't argue and will just spout memes/shitposts.

Okay, but Demon's Souls was rightfully criticized because it's inferior to Dark in every regard. Shiny paint won't fix its shitty multiplayer nor will it add in cut content.

Designs look worse. Why bother

If everything is the exact same, then why would I bother buying it a second time?
Retard. They should have changed it, Demon's Souls had plenty of opportunities for improvement. They didn't even add 6th archstone and they expect $(4)70 for this junk.

Active multiplayer.

yeah great, except the soundtrack is butchered and almost every single design in the game is worse, no exception
they also removed Lord Rydell's iconic scream, and Tower Knight theme no longer has its HA HA HA HA HA

Bluepoint: "We outsourced to China, Malaysia, Vietnam", source: youtu.be/9O--CnN056E?t=1540

Attached: jpg final copy 4.jpg (4356x4067, 3.3M)

I already own this game, not sure why I would buy it again

>Shiny paint won't fix its shitty multiplayer nor will it add in cut content.
True, but that wasn't my point. Every single shitpost about this game is about the art direction. Literally every single one.
But the gameplay is 100% the same, so people you praise the original game, can't objectively shit on the game.

Way I look at it is that the people praising the original game haven't played it. It was niche, but Zig Forums just wants that oldfag cred.

there isn't a remake out there that Zig Forums doesn't hate

>If everything is the exact same, then why would I bother buying it a second time?
So you only like the original game for the designs and soundtrack? not one bit for the gameplay?

Every shitpost is about the art direction because there is nothing else to discuss. They didn't change anything else - there's no potential selling points there.

I can't wait to see all the people sperg out about spending $70 on a game that's half as long as Dark Soul's.

You're not the target audience.
Some people never got the chance to play Demon's Souls and others want to replay the game with an active online scene.

kirby super star ultra

"Gameplay is the same", love this meme

Attached: valley old vs new.png (2500x1433, 2.21M)

okay but then why arbitrarily change all the art direction. At that point you're not playing the original, you're playing some western studio's bad interpretation of it

>So you only like the original game for the designs and soundtrack? not one bit for the gameplay?

nice try, but DeS is a complete package, no game is a single element; it just so happens that nearly every element of the remake is a downgrade outside of graphics, textures and lighting

>kirby super star ultra
pretty sure the one who forced the soul/soulless meme in the first place had an unhealthy obsession with that game

>Two completely different places
>Game sux they changed it
user confirmed trying to desperately grab attention.

Crash Team Racing remake was pretty well received round here

>Demon's Souls was rightfully criticized because it's inferior to Dark in every regard
How the fuck is that even possible when it came out first you clueless zoomer retard.

It looks uglier and there's a black dude in it
ALSO they made maiden in black look like some gross L.A whore

>people shit on the shit part of the game
in other news grass is also green

Metroid Zero Mission

>That means all the things you can shit on this game are purely cosmetic nature.
uh yeah
the whole point of the remake is purely cosmetic

that's an improvement, the old valley was giving me a headache

The best way I can describe the remake is that it has "more" graphics, but it's kind of a lateral improvement.

I'm still not buying Demon's Soulless.

REmake, RE2 Remake, CTR: NF (improvement over the original in every way), Metroid: Zero Mission

Speak for yourself faggot. I want to play the GAME not the online. These games are not elevated by their online, jesus christ you people are so fucking boring. Bunch a drooling retards

Learn your vidya history or kys.
When DeS released, PS3 was a joke.
Demon's was hated because it was only on PS3, like REmake on GC, a dead platform.
Now, the "remake" is on PS5, a platform riding the coat tails of a successful platform, so they'll pretend this is good no matter what,

>there isn't a remake out there that Zig Forums doesn't hate

Attached: 1591447685649.png (853x448, 858.72K)

>"Gameplay is the same"
Yes, that's the truth. Every speedrunner can run this the exact same way, exact glitches of course.
Every item is also at the exact same place and the you level up the exact same way, down to a single soul.

Youre thinking of Adventure and NiDL, which he's completely right about. Totally fucks the art

Her hair is like a mop. The art direction is considerably worse than the original, starting from the god awful UI.
What is wrong here is that nu-gamers and normies are still buying the game in droves because it is actually the only launch title for Basedstation 5. And they will praise it and go to Retardera to guzzle more sperm.

dumb casual

Dont care still playing the original demon’s souls on my ps3 (:

I'll buy it once it's £20
For now I'm just gonna game on Switch and PC

Spyro remake was great

Ahh, a new filter. S O Y is based, not onions. Fuck you Hiroshima.

So you confess that the original game always had absolute dog shit gameplay and you only played it for the textures?

no

Halo 2 Anniversary if we're talking shiny new paint.

Spyro remake gets shit on endlessly here

if the gameplay is literally the same but the style and graphics are worse I might as well go play through the PS3 demon's souls I already own
or buy it for like 20 fucking dollars OR LESS
This is in every regard inferior to the original

Yep exact same gameplay, so true

>buyers remorse already
lol

I know it's tough, but use your brain. I'm talking about post-Dark release, when Demon's actually got more than 6 people to play it since the franchise gained its first bit of real recognition.

>70 dollars/euros/pounds for a fresh coat of paint launch title
Please defend this.

What changed?
What are the new frames on enemy attacks or drop rates or npc/item locations?

Only when you compare it to the original game.It's still a kiddies game.

Idgf about old games. I could emulate this with 4k 60fps on pc

ABSOLUTE MADMAN

>no game
>get old good game
>give coat of new
Stop pretending this is shocking, whenever they actually do a "remake" it is the shits.

>What changed?
>What are the new frames on enemy attacks or drop rates or npc/item locations?
Well for starters you might dilate, you fucking tranny. This game is hand down the worst game i've ever played. Keep up the snoy cope.

>That means all the things you can shit on this game are purely cosmetic nature. This is without a doubt a big criteria
Dude, it's the main criteria of such a remake.

great argument right here
cool. but that wasn't even my point. if you blatantly shit on this game, you never played it or if you did, you valued asthetics over gameplay.

Shut up fag, if I wanted to hear someone nitpick a game they can't even afford to play I would go on youtube