Did 9th century English Saxons really have castles like this?
Did 9th century English Saxons really have castles like this?
Other urls found in this thread:
WE
WUZ
Did you not bother to do even 30 seconds of research before making this shit thread?
VIKANGZ N SHEEEEEEEETTTTTTTT
That bow looks dumb.
Its pretty based that you can duel wield shields in this game
dual
No. Alfred the Great was the one who started the castle building campaign after he defeated the Great Heathen Army and mostly it was just walling cities and rebuilding the Roman walls of old Roman settlements.
That's all they were. Walls. They weren't castles like they were suddenly afraid the Vikings were going to start using catapults and siege towers and shit.
I already knew the answer, which is as follows:
Of course they didn't . This game is full of blatant anachronisms and straight up fantasy shit, in the architecture, clothing, and even weapons.
It's a shame they think they have to "pretty up" historical periods to make them more appealing. They did the same shit with the Ancient Greece game and turned it into disney's hercules.
Asscreed has always been mediocre, but at least before they put effort into the settings and you could use them as historical tourism sims. AC unity Paris was literally 1:1 scale with all the monuments and churches being scaled and spaced identically to real life. Oh well.
>game is full of niggers, gays and feminists
>user worries about an inaccurate castle
haha
I'm not into the storyline so I don't care about that, I just wanna explore faithfully recreated historical settings. Which I can't do anymore.
Fair enough. But they went full fantasy with the previous game right? So something like this was expected.
nope anglo saxons had moats actual castles where a contintental thing
Niet. Even if they did, the castles in-game are obviously modern ruins
Yes but that game was by a different development studio where as this game was made by a studio who previously had been pretty faithful and grounded
Based
Okay, you see that shit on top of everything that looks like bad dentistry? That's supposed to have wood over it. Those are basically windows.
This isn't a castle, it's what the ruins of a castle look like today.
I can only assume that Ubisoft got their concept of what a real castle actually looks like from Super Mario Brothers.
By the way, while I'm still in a bitching mood. I can't express my displeasure enough of how they forgo the practical and well-crafted clothing and armor vikings really used, for generic cosplay-looking fur pelt caveman leather shit.
This game takes place in 840AD and that structure looks abandon for AT LEAST 100 years so it's even worse than I first thought.
wish i could be a viking in shining mail pillaging christian cucks and stealing their daughters
Valhalla Rising better
youtube.com
I will now buy your game
You can literally tell that the real design was made for cosplayers. I mean it Looks like a bad cosplay. A million leather belts, giant foam axe props, etc.
The only thing more retarded than complaining about historical accuracy in an Assassins Creed game is caring about Assassins Creed games.
It's literally the equivalent of sitting down in a sandpit with a bunch of toddlers and telling them they're doing it wrong.
If you're going to make something fantasy make it fantasy, if you're going for a historical representation then do that. Don't be a literal nigger about it.
Stone castles as we know them weren't built in England until the Normans came. Before that the Saxons were largely building wooden fortifications.
They didn't... Heavily fortified stones castles were a medieval era thing, so after the Norman invasion of England.
It's condescending.
Wow calm down pedo
They used to get the settings very right. Obviously the storylines and superhuman climbing skills were never accurate. But I never cared about those parts, I just wanted to explore accurate recreations of historical sites and monuments, which most games in the series did a stunning job of. Until recently.
If they wanted to actually make it historically accurate they'd just remove the women. Women didn't fight in wars except in a few exceptions as archers in the scythian tribes. The most fighting a norse woman would do is maybe to defend the village while the men were on a raid. Having a woman on a raid would be suicide.