Do you believe these recommended settings? Do you think it will be possible to get 60 fps in 1080p at high/ultra with these settings?
Do you believe these recommended settings...
Other urls found in this thread:
support.cdprojektred.com
twitter.com
Once they are done raping the graphic so console can run it? Sure.
SSD is all it takes to run modern open world games
60 fps yes, but not at high/ultra
Recommended means medium/high.
How do you know? It means whatever the developer wants.
name 1 game where recommendations were lying
hardmode: no ubisoft trash
>minimum is i5-4460 R9 280X
>ran this game on an i3-540 GTX560ti rig at 60 fps medium setting.
They specs are probably meant for 4K.
I'm sure gonna enjoy my ray-tracing Ultra Quality.. Oh Boy
they have to make the game work on fucking 2013 consoles
it's not gonna be demanding outside of meme options like raytracing
>DirectX 12
Not cyberpunk enough to run on Windows 7 I see
the only thing that looks a bit weird is requiring 12GB of RAM. Maybe they're accounting for all the shit that'd run in the background like a browser, discord and other shitware. Even Kingdom Come doesn't use that much memory I think.
8gb vs 16gb is a massive difference in general, everything is a lot snappier, people who are still stuck with 8gb don't know how bad it really is.
16GB is optimum for Ultra Settings in this game I reckon.
Get a 2xxxRT Series or above too.
that really depends on the game and how much stuff you leave open in the background. 4GB used to be enough to launch things like Crysis 3 and MGSV but switching to 8 and more would reduce the occasional stutter.
IIRC Call of Duty Ghost was one of the first game to require 6GB, maybe some people complained at the time but it turned out the game never actually allocated more than 3. Maybe that'll be the same for CP77 and the devs are just being careful. Not that I care with my 32GB anyway.
>game is optimized
>bad
2020 Zig Forums everybody
True. I remember that years ago when I upgraded from 8 GB to 16 GB it boosted my fps in Battlefield from like 40 to 60-70. My rig back then was i3 (don't remember which gen) and some medium-tier radeon.
Should I just get an external SSD for this game? I just settled for a hard drive when building my computer because I needed to cut corners somewhere. I only really play old games anyway, so I thought it really wouldn't be a problem, but I got HL:Alyx and the load times are fucking terrible. I'm kinda worried that most new games are just gonna be fucking unbearable with a hard drive. Besides that my PC will be able to easily run the game.
> external
Depends what are you going to connect it to. USB A? Don't bother.
>external
stupid niggers don't know how to read
Please note that the game is both graphics- and processor-intensive, so make sure these components meet or exceed the minimum requirements. Also note that the minimum is created with Low settings and 1080p gaming in mind and Recommended with High and 1080p.
support.cdprojektred.com
I'm a fucking retard and don't really know that much about computers. From the greentexting I'm guessing this would be a bad thing to do?
i7-4790k chads rise up
why not just attach an SSD? does your computer not have a slot for it?
it can run on win7, what do you mean?
Why would you run an external drive when your PC should have 4-6 sata slots? In fact you should install the OS in the SSD too since that's a massive improvement.
yeah, but they don't specify if it's intended for 30 or 60fps
>2020
>hdd
why? go steal or get a job or something...
So? They didn't say anything about framerate.
USB connection will bottleneck the SSD. Like, very.
It's a prebuilt that I bought because my old computer was desperately out of date, and ready to die any day. I just needed one that would be able to play new games, and the hard drive was where it really lacked. I'm gonna take a gander inside to see if I can install a SSD.
cinematic 24 full frames per second
Not funny user, my uncle died due to Serial Bus Defragmentation
1080/30
med/high