PC GAMING STRIKES BACK

>TENS OF THOUSANDS $ AND STILL FUCKIN 35 FPS

>AS BIG AS A FUCKIN FRIDGE

>JESUS CHRIST ON A STICK

youtu.be/Qa0jZnrQrIA?t=839

ALL this to fight a $400 console

Attached: Untjghjgfhjghitled.jpg (881x655, 56.82K)

Not going to watch your bait trash videos but it is literally impossible to be gimped at 35fps on a high end PC unless you have a 8k resolution or playing unoptimised shit.

I mean, you're lying, but 35 is still more than consoles get LMAO

you just sustified a triple 3090 pc getting 35fps in anno at 4k

end it

and what framerate would consoles get in Anno at 4K, retard

>unoptimised shit.
Literally all pc games

Consoles would fucking shit themselves with blood if someone decides to port Anno to consoles. What are you smoking?

Attached: IMG_20201120_092027.jpg (720x574, 97.09K)

kek

>ALL this to fight a $400 console

consoles are good enough for 4k / 20-30fps @ medium details while on PC 4k / 60+ fps on ultra detail is the standard.

Attached: Orphan Black (2013) - S02E08 - Variable and Full of Perturbation (1080p BluRay x265 RCVR).mkv_snapshot_34.23_[2020.11.17_09.25.27].jpg (993x561, 52.92K)

>pays 500-700 for a PC
>overall pays less due to no paid online and cheaper games
>has modding
>has emulation
>has apps
>has streaming
>has alive communities
>has more games
>consoletards somehow think their better hardware (which will stop being better in 2-3 generations) makes up for any of that when a 1660s can still run just about practically anything you want

Didn't watch still playing on pc have sex concel

4k 60fps is not the standard
most people are on 1060s and dont buy overpriced ampere or turing dogshit and will wait until later

>imagine playing on PC and unironically sucking dick of specs and new hardware and thinking thats what defines your platform when most players have substantially weaker specs than consoles while being better off in every other aspect

Probably higher since devs actually optimize their games for consoles.
Unlike the wild fuckwest that is the PC market. Literally who even gives a shit about your "platform".

AKA they lower a fuckload of graphical settings while adding some cheap polishing to not make it so obvious.
Consolefags will never stop being retarded by the looks of it.

0 you mean? Anno is not on consoles.

Is this true? I always try to get flagships since if my pc isn’t at it’s best for me it becomes useless and i might as well play exclusively on consoles.

Keep your 30FPS mobile phone game. I didn't even know it existed.
Meanwhile PC still gets 0FPS on Bloodborne.

Anno looks like a turd even in 8k Ultra Giga Nigga settings on a $10000 PC. Keep it.

Like 0.5.

>emulated in next 3 years
:)

>gets BTFO
>b-but it looks BAD okay
Kill yourself nigger.

Why are you so obsessed with PC?

Attached: Average concel.png (916x936, 1.04M)

>50 vs 50 online PC game
>can play at 120fps
>still looks better than graphics showcase "cinematic" console games locked at 30fps

Lmao @ you

Attached: loose.jpg (1002x580, 143.88K)

PS3 is 14 years old and you're still barely emulating 2 games from it.
Have fun waiting more than a decade for Bloodborne I guess. I'll be playing Bloodborne 3 by then.

Gets BTFO how? It does look bad. It looks like utter fucking dogshit. Literally a phone game.
Everybody is laughing at you and your overpriced paperweight you call a "gayman PC" that plays emulated PS2 games marred with glitches and literal phone "strategy" clickers.

Because he bought ps5 from a scalper for over 1k, but then he remembered he used to shitpost about PCs costing 1k.

I found that episode funny.
>2 RTX 3090
>like 1tb of Ram
>a Threadripper Cpu with 32 cores
still can't play a games at 4k 60fps.
kek

Everyone in this thread is a retard and I hope you all die horribly.

>being this much of a delusional nigger

>since devs actually optimize
they literally just play with the PC graphic presets til it works right.

You're seething so hard you can't even argue anymore. Double digit IQ subhuman.

Have fun with your Android ports on Steam dude.

>hurrr no u durrrr
Speak English, chimp.

This video embarrasses me for video games. All of this technology, all of this money only for more fps and greater fidelity of textures and fx.

But the same shitty, uninspired, simplistic gameplay loops over and over again, over and over again.

yea
good luck playing that game in relatively respectable quality like, ever
That rig can probably crack 150+fps on metro exodus though

>PS3 is 14 years old and you're still barely emulating 2 games from it.
you're really, really behind on how good emulation is, if you legitimately think this.

>Probably higher since devs actually optimize their games for consoles.

This is quite funny considering this thread is about a game only getting 35fps on PC, and console """"optimization""" is literally just locking everything at 30fps so you push a few graphics settings a bit higher

>jaded boomer
just try to find actually good games and ignore generic AAA garbage = you find good games

Literally can't dispute this. And also:
>able to use any controller or hardware you want
>able to upgrade individual parts if the need arises
>can to do other tasks other than gaming, even to make more games
The only thing it can't do is Bloodborne. Yet.

Loads of cope.

>Have fun waiting more than a decade for Bloodborne I guess.
Gpcs4 can already run Bloodborne user.

>got raped so hard he went illiterate
Get it together, turd world ape.

I'm 100% right.

You're 100% retarded.

Prove it.

Tranny look

ITT: cope
a top-of-the-line PC will always outperform consoles in every single aspect imaginable period

>paying $10000 to play an Android-tier clicker in 35FPS and Bloodborne at 0FPS
It's not cope. You are to be pitied.

Bro....over 200FPS on CS:GO....wooow

Take your meds, mutt.

Still that overpiced garbage hasn't match 2013 console graphics.

Attached: not possible on pc.jpg (1920x1080, 1.38M)