Nostalgia free halo campaign ranking

Every Halo game is basically just okay so you can put 3, reach, or odst first, I don't care which. 2 is a poorly paced, poorly balanced mess and it is public knowledge that it was stitched together at the last minute after they had to cut everything.

I would disagree with Halo 4 > Halo 5.
4 story is better than 5s easily, but 5 has better missions. As 5s MP is better than 4s by a wide margin. The tie breaker is Halo 5 having the best forge mode in the series, over Halo 4 seemingly not getting a forge community at all.

And yet Reach is worse.

>you can put reach first

CE
>solid sp
>solid mp
Reach
>solid missions, YMWV story
>decent mp, depends what you wanted
>firefight
>Forge.

Reach is an outright better product

I didn't say it was the best, just that you can considered it the best if you so choose. You are objectively wrong to say halo 2 is best.

3>1>Reach>2>ODST>4>5

Attached: 1471833125400.jpg (496x492, 44.27K)

Having replayed reach this year for the first time in years, it certainly was far worse than I remembered, but it was still leagues less shit that CE. At least reach is easy to push through to the end.

Any game besides 4/5 is better than reach

Closest thing to accurate in this thread.

4 is actually too short to have an opinion on. If you claim to have an opinion on 4, you are lying.

At no point in reach do you spawn in the middle of an open room surrounded by brutes.

ODST above Reach and 2, Reach below 2 and we'll call this acceptable.

I honestly agree, halo 4s level design was just big open areas with different themes to them. Halo 5s level design is tighter and feels like it was made with the abilites at hand while halo 4s overall design feels like both gameplay and level design were made by two different teams who didn't talk to each other

No, because Reach isn't a good game and doesn't have the balls to challenge you.

3>ODST>1>Reach>2>huge gap>4>5

3>1>Reach>ODST>2

3 is simply the peak. Culmination of Bungie's work and skill.

1 was where it all began. And laid the mystery and foundation for everything else.

Reach in terms of pushing the 360 to its limits. Lots of interesting set pieces and levels. More story and character driven than ODST.

ODST is great by trying something different. And exploring the city was neat. Interesting levels but it just feels kind of glued together somehow.

2 was garbage asides Arbiter. The 'two of each level type' was lame. Cliff hanger was complete bullshit, and you were mad when it happened.

4 and 5 might as well not be halo.

Attached: dune(2020).jpg (1050x450, 89.81K)

Bad design isn't a challenge.

Objectively correct OP

Im tired of reachturds and 3babies acting like theyre the spokesmen of halo, your games competed directly with COD and lost miserably, halo is a joke because of your shitty games.
CE is simply halo at its purest, it has soul built into it compared to the shallow sequels.
I AM BASED

Attached: 53a15269b7829a0e67e16c56e767effb.png (602x785, 448.77K)

/thread

t.bad lmao

BASED KINGposter.
CE is the king of xbox and made it what it is when it was prosperious.
Reach and ODST fucked halo and the xbox forever

>disliking Halo Wars

Attached: 1208949081.jpg (512x435, 24.99K)

God I hate forced fanbase wars like this.

only retards who have never played a proper rts like halo wars

Halo 3 took down multiple CoDs and was the highest selling FPS on the 360, as well as the most played FPS on the platform. Bow to the fucking King.

Attached: 1600333530505.png (750x422, 646.98K)

Actually git gud