XBrethren

And it's a software choke-point, which means it can be patched by both MS and 3rd party devs.

>get pc
>load that bitch up with fast ram and pci-e x16 nvme adapters in raid for maximum speed
>get the top end gpu
>get the top end cpu
>run everything at 8k ultrawide
>stutters like a motherfucker but can almost hit stable 30
>looks real fucking nice
>laugh at the plebs getting MAYBE 4k with dynamic resolution on their shitty systems

>4 different rendering modes
lol consoles are becoming PCs

you forgot the best part
>be fat manchild permavirgin

sure but neither are 120

4k has always been a meme. Marketing execs pushed it because it focused on still screens, which work better in advertising (magazines, web banners, etc). You can't flex-dick about framerate on a magazine page because no one can see the difference in 1 frame. But with 4k, you can. Only in practice, no one is using native 4k. Even now. Probably less than 1% of PC gamers are using native 4k. It's all bullshit. They robbed you of framerate improvements for 15 years so they could put adds in magazines.

theres a monkeys paw to everything but its worth it

>and then everyone clapped

Enjoy your 8K Valorant I guess. These consoles are already beating 3080 in multiplats. Over time your system will scale even worse with every future driver update and new game release.

>playing valorant
why play valorant when i can play ace of spades in 8k with rtx on

Correct, you are observant.

>These consoles are already beating 3080 in multiplats.
No, they're not. The only comparisons done have been completely half-baked with no attempt at any sort of standardization or accuracy. Same for Xbox vs. PS5 shit. Like OP's video, which is a clusterfuck that would leave any autist in tears over the amount of laws of comparison that were broken.

native 4k was just mustards using it a benchmark against last gen console (ps4 pro) 'it's not REAL 4k'
now that faux 4k/(rt+dlss) is the new shit that's really what devs should focus on instead of 4k or rt or 120hz modes

1080p60fps with rt with ai supersampling to 4k

native 8k is attainable you know

Current HDMI standards can't handle more than 4k @ 120fps. If you're going 8k, you're capped at 60fps.

theres a reason i specified 8k almost 30fps stable in the post user. i know what my limitations are

Can you produce any proof that the Xbox runs similar parts of the game as well or better?

You can google it. I mean, right here:
They're talking about DMC5. They say the only instance where PS5 outperforms Xbox is the fake-4k mode. "High Framerate Mode" ... oh, and let's look at OP's video again. What are the words in the top left?
>"High Frame-Rate Mode"
The comparison is cherry-picked bullshit to make the PS5 look better, when all other modes show XBox doing, at worst, the same. And the only reason it's not outperforming the PS5 in high-frame-rate mode is due to software which can easily be patched and nothing to do with the system itself.

>I-i-it's the software's fault! It's not taking full advantage of the awesome power of the Series X!

why are backwards compatible games loading quicker and preforming better on xbox series x? I thought the ps5 had a better SSD? oh, its because of the software right?

Software and APIs take time to optimize, comparing early games is console war bullshit that will be cherry picked every time.

Attached: 1605980851856.jpg (1911x1013, 261.94K)

I find the more funny part is 4k mode runs better than so called "high framerate" mode.

Attached: media_EnHquJgW4AAke9u.jpg name=orig.jpg (1080x600, 75.94K)

Why would Xbox owners paying 70$ for Dirt 5 when they can just play Forza Horizon 4 via gamepass?

That was because of bugs and a unoptimized port. The ps5's API is easier for devs, because xbox was slow to send dev kits and they have multiple skews.

What was Microsoft doing while preparing the SeX launch? It's not like they were making any games for Xbone. There is literally no reason for them to have "muh tools are late uWu" excuses when the competitor not only readied their console with launch games, they also had two big profile games for their old console. This is also with constant news and rumors of how SeX was a design genius that was ready to launch at any time while PS5 was some unholy abomination that was being rushed and shit.

The "bugs" cope were referring to the performance mode using X1 assets to hit 120fps. It had nothing to do with resolution mode.

Attached: 1605887613591.jpg (1376x1560, 496.1K)

>xbox was slow to send dev kits
Why were they slow?

>The ps5's API is easier for devs
Why didn't Microsoft made it even easier for devs for their consoles?

Reminder that tools cope is bullshit debunked by the developers themselves.

Attached: media_EnYkDU8WMAAs9RP.jpg name=orig.jpg (1080x1822, 249.71K)

>it's a bug! everything's bugged!

Attached: media_EnX5PBaXUAIGbak.jpg name=orig.jpg (2048x945, 245.17K)

Not really

Attached: NvQU9PR.jpg (1074x1276, 86.42K)

In fact they apologized.

Attached: 20201123003301.jpg (857x390, 60.48K)

I'll take 70 with less artifacts over 98 and made of block-mud

>game runs like shit on Xbox
>requires additional patching to bring it closer to PS5's performance
>TH-THAT MEANS TOOLS COPE IS REEEEAL

Attached: media_EnYeTAEW8AMPMfU.png name=orig.png (712x111, 6.98K)

Another cherry picked image, from a ubisoft game. Do we need to go over their history of shit console ports. The digital foundry guys blame it on the xbox API in that exact video. Its not the hardware, this will change throughout the year/years.

jap devs cant code to save their life news at 11

call me when you can play flight simulator 20, game of the generation, on ps5

seeWhy do you think he mentioned 120hz? Are Dirt 5 devs going to patch Valhalla for you retards?

You just came out of a mental hospital or something