>B-B-BUT THE YOUTUBE MAN TOLD ME 60+ FPS GOOD AND LESS IS BAD
B-B-BUT THE YOUTUBE MAN TOLD ME 60+ FPS GOOD AND LESS IS BAD
movies and films, huh... what about video games?
This is Zig Forums, sir. No video games allowed.
Only PCfags will tell you that. 30fps is perfectly fine. Anything over 60fps is overkill and won’t be noticeable unless you buy a $600 monitor
>30fps is perfectly fine
It's good for movies (natural motion blur) and ok for games. 60 is better in some games and shit for others. I couldn't stand GoW 3 at 60.
>can't afford a 144hz monitor
bruh
If you cannot tell the difference between 30fps and 60, you are literally a subhuman. Your eyes are literally less evolved. You would not survive in the wild.
>screen is jumpy as fuck when those is a long, slow pan
How do film faggots defend this?
why would you even save that pic
>It's cinematic, bro
Movies aren't games. Your argument is shit. Console plebs remain bootlickers who repeat corporate bullshit to justify their obsession.
Yes thats true. Only reason we still have 24fps in cinema is the same reason consolfags think 30fps is fine. "M-muh cinematic" feel.
>Anything over 60fps is overkill and won’t be noticeable unless you buy a $600 monitor
The words of a little boy who has never actually used a high refresh rate monitor.
>B-b-but I did
Silence! Do not try to save face by lying. Accept your defeat and purchase a HFR monitor. Become enlightened.
>AAAAAAAAIEEEEE CONSOLE-SAMA PLEASE AAAAAAAAAAAIIIIIIEEEEEEEEEEEEE
>PLEASE CONSOLE-SAMA I KNEEL AAAAAAAAAAAIEEEEEEEE
>t. Someone who has never used a high refresh rate monitor
>Playstation essentials
24fps is kept for film because you're not interacting with it. It's also easier to edit and display effects in a more convincing manner.
I just wanted to say that 60fps TV dramas look fucking weird.
>pad out every frame with sickening motion blur
Pause any film during a panning shot and see for yourself
24 FPS was the standard because it's the cheapest speed you can get away with when you're projecting off of film. No need to limit yourself when it's a digital format.
what do you mean? 1080p 144hz monitors are only $100-150
Also way cheaper. Imagine if you had to render the cgi at 60 fps. More than double the expense.
PlayStation “games” I assume
These niggers would not accept reality even when faced with it. Remember these are the cope niggers who, every generation, cheer that they are owning pc and getting 4k 60fps only to then cope and claim 30fps is perfectly fine, when they get scammed.
what happened now? cyberpunk?
The only reason why we have 24 in cinema still is that people are not used to high refresh rates. I have friends who have headaches after watching a movie in 60 or 120 fps.
24 was there at the time of the film, because film was expensive and 24 frames a second capture was the cheapest way to capture while keeping the illusion of movement unhindered.
literally 10fps is playable you "people" are little baby
24 is cinematic experience, there was nice comparison of some movie in 60 and 24 frames, 60 looked weird as fuck and you focused on movement more than plot.
60 fps on the other hand is good for games since it's not so action/plot stuffed
>snoys when people compare PlayStations to PCs
>g-graphics don’t matter
>snoys when people compare Switches and PlayStation
>LOL FUCKING TENDIES ENJOY YOUR 30 FPS 720P
You can’t win with these faggots
Movies in 60fps is weird because of the soap opera effect in general, and each frame means less. For games it's completely different because good controls and interaction between game and player is almost always necessary for a pleasant game experience, as unresponsive games are terribly frustrating.
it's to show his disgust.
These fags exist in literally every single generation since film and cinema, now with games. If we had the internet in the days these fucking retards were afraid of trains projected onto screens, theyd claim that was superior.
This. Peter Jackson used tried to push 48FPS as a new standard and sadly failed because Hobbit was shit and normies were mad because the movie looked "like a soap opera".
>games are movies and films
hurr hurr
the expression of their picture is "not fine"
while they are saying "its perfectly fine"
suggesting that they are lying and its not perfectly fine.
:v)
Poor people really should not have access to the internet.
you are a retard.
it's fine for movies but for an interactive medium like video games where you actually control the visuals, then the smoother the FPS the better because your fingers don't move at 24 FPS.
yea it always look like it's filmed with home video camera
yes *plops out my movie eyes and plops in my razer™ gamer™ eyes*
Bonus fact, that is actually him smiling. Like unironically trying to smile with those pearly whites that, from what ive heard, are going the way of his natural teeth, since pimping out a fattie doesnt make him not a fattie.
i have a $280 1440p 155hz Dell monitor. its annoying when the fps is below 90.
And yet all modern cartoons are animated in 60fps.
Curious.
limit it to 60 like normal people. or stop whining about shifting framerates or buy better computer or put lower resolution and graphics settings or get a dog and make it play your games so you don't have to stand the shifting fps