Friendly reminder that only the original Demon Souls and DaS1 are the good games from Miyazaki

A little bit no? Probably just the big black eyes
I was sad when I "killed" it

Attached: b6f8f032c44aa36f750eb78010b9b163.jpg (1280x720, 189.76K)

Your invitation to Cainhurst has been revoked.

Are you retarded. The OP is clearly stating that the paradigm disappeared after DS1. Your post agrees with him

BEHOLD the official soulsborne tierlist.

Attached: 81484848981.png (291x290, 83.19K)

Fixed it.

Attached: 1606247455558.png (1584x1755, 2.16M)

All of those things are there when that enemy is moving around, the layers of dirt on him indicate his ancientness. Low IQ western subhumans like you don't understand, even when certain enemies have a dirty looking design, they still have their elegance to them and the dirty design has lore and level implications.

It's very rare for me to find one of these tier lists I agree with

Those designs make more sense in a game like Bloodborne though. What he's saying works for a medieval fantasy game like Dark Souls, wouldn't for Bloodborne.

Much better.

desu every DS games go against what he says in the quote. Ds3 has those disgusting ass mfs in the prison and ds2 has the fucking gunt goblins.

Super cringe. Dark Souls 3 is the better game, even if it is less original than Demon's Souls. The level design, boss design, art direction and gameplay of Dark Souls 3 is far better than that of Demon's Souls. Soundtrack is about equal, with different strengths and weaknesses in both cases. You are lucky Bandai Namco ruined the potential of Dark Souls 3, if they didn't, Dark Souls 3 would have been another Flawed Masterpiece.

Attached: 1599840373454.jpg (670x1024, 91.65K)

Describe 1 (one) disgusting enemy on DaS1.

I would demote DaS, it has far too many problems that cant be overlooked. Sekiro is mediocre but gets extra points for novelty so it's at least better than DaS2 but worse than Demon's Souls.

Attached: 1594937194761.png (2939x1769, 2.23M)

oh look, a filtered shitter who relies on rolls and summons

I think DeS wins because better NPCs, more original bosses (both in gameplay and design sense) and it doesn't try to spoonfeed the player. DS3 doesn't have any cool touches like the 3 phantoms before allant, world tendency, astrea etc. it's too much of a nostalgia bait that you saying DeS players are nostalgic is hypocritical.

Attached: low quality bait.jpg (125x125, 2.12K)

I like DS2, AMA

Ironically enough the undead dragon but dark souls is a game with fucking slimes and people with maggots on their back.

Original boss design doesn't mean it is good gameplay wise, Dark Souls 3 has better bosses with actual fights, instead of puzzle garbage non-bosses. Every bad boss in Dark Souls 3 can have its design philosophy tracked back to that of Demon's Souls and their gimmicky garbage bosses. Dragon God and Storm King are worse bosses than Bed of Chaos. World Tendency is the worst mechanic From Software has ever tried out, even worse than Soul Memory and ADP. You nostalgia high idiots are damaging the reputation of Demon's Souls by overhyping it, instead of seeing for what it truly is and appreciating it for what it did for gaming, instead of living in your delusions. Demon's Souls has a lot going for it, Bosses isn't one of them and World Tendency certainly isn't either.

Attached: 1605183211757.jpg (324x649, 33.39K)

This, OP is also a dumbass

demons souls sucks so much i don't understand the appeal. I've tried playing it several times

>Explains its influences
Aren't the influences obvious enough already?

>3
>anywhere but the bottom

Wasn't bloodborne his favorite soulsborne game? I think he said that in the same interview

Retarded image. Bloodborne is very clearly a different setting than DeS and DaS. Those games have that "lost nobility" because they are dark medieval fantasy, whereas BB is weird fiction about alien plagues and shit, of course it's going to be more grotesque