Ayn Rand was right
Ayn Rand was right
Other urls found in this thread:
No she wasn't, her philosophy was moronic. In her perfect world public services wouldn't exist. There would no police officers, no firefighters, no hospitals, etc. If you wanted something you would be expected to obtain it for yourself without help or to make something that you wanted. There would be no grocery stores. You'd have to grow all your food. Chop all your wood. You wouldn't be allowed to ask for help from your fellow man for something as simple as directions. Obviously religion wouldn't exist either, but it wouldn't be a paradise for atheists either. Sure, there is no religion, but good luck enjoying anything else without modern convenience, and good luck getting by without medicine.
Gotta a headache? Well tough shit, can't go and buy tylenol. Got a stomach ache? Well sucks to be you, can't go get pepto bismol. You're gonna have to heal yourself with your own knowledge and hope it works. I guarantee you probably 80% if not higher of the people would not last one week living in Ayn Rand's world. Most people on this board don't even know how to cook, let alone chop wood or any survival skills.
>There would no police officers, no firefighters, no hospitals
>he thinks those people do those things out of altruism
LMAO. They do those jobs to get paid people would still do them. You will in a childish version of reality.
recently replayed the first 2, even better than I remember
they don't make em like that anymore
infinite on the other hand, goddamn what a travesty
that's not what it means idiot. In her world (Rapture) the basic rule "You don't work, you don't eat." applies and also that morality is fuckall when it comes to advancement of ideas. People are expected to take responsibilities for their doings and this will push them to actually do things. Basic life necessities will of course exists since there are people comfy with having their own restaurants and their family stores and also making food. Besides Rapture is so advanced there won't be a need for uselees workers like cashiers or gas attendants since it was proven they had working robots already.
why are young people on the losing side of politics obsessed with fiction
Rapture is a fictitious world and isn't a proper representation of Ayn Rand's philosophy applied in a modern day and realistic setting. Wake up and smell the coffee.
>People's one motivator is money
It's true but also sad if you judge the entire human race by one standard.
extreme retard
extreme
>Ayn Rand
Objectivism is pure sperggery. Also imagine reading political theory from w*men, unironically
Ayn Rand is the reason why I don't read books written by women. I say this as an AnCap. Fuck that dumb cunt poisoning the well of Libertarianism forever.
You're even more retarded if you actually liked her philosophy and ideas.
>tfw BASED ayn rand spent her entire life shitting on welfare queens and ended up on social security in her later years
>edge 16 year olds use her schizophrenic rants as a political """"""philosophy"""""""
The only thing Ayn Rand was right about is that the smallest minority on earth is the individual. Her philosophy is broken.
what retards think of Objectivism
>"People will just take stuff and steal away and society will never form!"
what it actually is
>"You want something? Work for it. Take responsibility of your own wants and desires.
>why are young people on the losing side of politics obsessed with fiction
yeah why do leftards keep comparing real life political figures to marvel or harry potter characters? Do they have no other frame of reference?
Objectivism contradicts evolutionary psychology. We are a tribal species, being subjected to isolation literally gives us brain damage. Doesnt mean that gommunism :DD is the way to go though. Any system that relies on industrial civiliation to exist, shouldn't.
Objectivism and Comunism are really great on paper, but once you try to apply them into real life you realize how humanity is fillied to the brim with scumbags that will exploit the system on their benefit, no matter how many people they hurt or kill in the process.
neofeminism is just like this.
>Any system that relies on industrial civiliation to exist, shouldn't.
imagine being this fucking retarded Jesus Fucking Christ what an absolute moronic opinion
Ayn Rand is overrated, and is just the philosopher for pseudo intellectual sociopaths who want to be absolved of the guilt of having no empathy but also being lazy as fuck.
She was fleeing a communist regime and went way too far in the opposite direction with her philosophy. There is nothing rational about that pure monkey-brained black/white thinking.
sounds like your pussy ass self is scared of not having other people do all the work for them.
cry more, civtard. Industrial civilization has caused humanity immense amounts of grief; On a physiological level, unprecedented levels of chronic metabolic and mental illness can be directly attributed to the toxic byproducts of industrial production. On a sociological level, the human labor it requires has led to historically unprecedented amounts of alienation, of anomie. It has been an absolute net negative on humanity.
You overestimate society and people in general if you don't think the majority of people rely on modern conveniences. How long could you personally go without internet? Television? Phone? Video games? Central air and heating? A warm bed? A shower? Etc.
Most wouldn't last a day, let alone a week.
They would do them only if enough people paid them for it. But should it ever benefit them to turn the tables and rob the people paying them they would do that instead. He's right, you are not.
>we are a tribal species
you are literally so fucking stupid and wrong empirically false
if we're not tribal then why have you been posting user here for a decade?
>empirically false
Give me some evidence then retard. I am right on both an empirical and intuitive level.
>you are literally so fucking stupid and wrong empirically false
>t. has not studied a lick of anthropology
Fuck off dumbass, you clearly dont know jack shit
Fuck your anthropology, study sociology instead
I've only been posting here for 19 and a half years.
So what then, we should burn everything down? Disregard all the technological advances we've made and all the knowledge that's come with it? The problems with modern civilization won't be fixed by literally regressing, buddy.
>Industrial civilization has caused humanity immense amounts of grief
you know what else causes humanity immense amounts of grief?
starvation, and pneumonia
>The mutual dependence of men is so great in all societies that scarce any human action is entirely complete in itself, or is performed without some reference to the actions of others, which are requisite to make it answer fully the intention of the agent. The poorest artificer, who labours alone, expects at least the protection of the magistrate, to ensure him the enjoyment of the fruits of his labour. He also expects that, when he carries his goods to market, and offers them at a reasonable price, he shall find purchasers, and shall be able, by the money he acquires, to engage others to supply him with those commodities which are requisite for his subsistence. In proportion as men extend their dealings, and render their intercourse with others more complicated, they always comprehend, in their schemes of life, a greater variety of voluntary actions, which they expect, from the proper motives, to co-operate with their own. In all these conclusions they take their measures from past experience, in the same manner as in their reasonings concerning external objects; and firmly believe that men, as well as all the elements, are to continue, in their operations, the same that they have ever found them. A manufacturer reckons upon the labour of his servants for the execution of any work as much as upon the tools which he employs, and would be equally surprised were his expectations disappointed. In short, this experimental inference and reasoning concerning the actions of others enters so much into human life that no man, while awake, is ever a moment without employing it.
>If you wanted something you would be expected to obtain it for yourself without help or to make something that you wanted
so literally natural selection. What's the problem with that again?
>Fuck your anthropology, study sociology instead
LMAO
Also sociology literally supports what I'm saying lol. Read gergen. Retard. The human brain can only support a certain level of social saturation before experiencing stress and/or anomie. We are not designed to live in cities.
>why are young people on the losing side of politics obsessed with fiction
I thought the left was the one obsessed with "transgender oppression"?
Ayn Rand was just being a contrarian against the dominant concept of the time: City of the Hill. It was literally just to shock people and make sales. Its a cash grab. Thats it. Nothing else but a desperate attempt to get money. Like punk rock, the third reich, and General Electric; these things weren't spawned to make the world better.