$500 million

That animation looks stiff as fuck, damn. Even an amateur animator could spot that.

when did they say this was supposed to release again?

Attached: 1376103463966.jpg (490x301, 27.82K)

You think diversity hires know how to animate?
Think again, bucko.

>10 Chinese shekels

Attached: 1597505079203.webm (640x360, 2.93M)

I think it looks fine

It was supposed to be xbox launch game or at least launch window game.
Not anymore lmao.

Last week

rumor is they are scrapping the entire opening sequence for a more action base balls to the wall on rails scenario to show off the new coat of paint they are upgrading it with

maybe 10% of that actually went into the E3 bullshot
the rest went into the Netflix series

>we still have no idea what halo is but let's appeal to the brain-dead Steven Spielberg audience

Why does my opinion bother you?

>343

Attached: 1595029424341.jpg (750x739, 37.69K)

More the half of it is usually marketing.
Look up Modern Warfare 2 (2009) budget.

Because your a fraud, now get out faggot.

Scam Citizen is $310 million
Skyrim was $80 million

I don't even know how this happened.

Halo 5 may have a shitty campaign, but at least it unquestionably looked like an Xbox One title compared to the prior 360 Halo games.

you're welcome, incels

Attached: girlpower.jpg (4096x2454, 1.44M)

This is some serious coping desu.

Godamn it beat both Star Citizen and Pirates of the Carribean on Stranger Tides (Most expensive film 379m)

Is this game the second coming of Christ?

That looks nice and gritty but I still can't stand the Destiny bing bang wahoo Apex Legends Fornut futuristic garbage that looks like something a 12 year old would come up with after getting hit on the head with a brick during a backyard airsoft fight. Different strokes.

Witcher 3 was $81 million
Cyberpunk 2077 is $314 million
Red Dead Redemption 2 was $100 million

Attached: 1595597569483.jpg (1065x1064, 103.59K)

Do you think this impending bomb might finally make heads roll at 343? How many more chances is big daddy M$ gonna give these failures?

>every single one is ugly
what gives?

> old studio that makes video game series leaves
> "oh i know what to do. make a new studio dedicated entirely to churning out new entries in the series at all costs, and nothing else!"
it's like sonic team but worse

They (allegedly) spent most of the budget on a brand new engine made from scratch.
But the reality is that the development team is bloated with diversity hires that get overpaid for basically doing nothing but outsourcing work to Malaysia.

Attached: 1597633078211.jpg (1500x1421, 420.45K)

It makes sense now considering they wanted this piece of shit to run at 4k120fps
It's gonna have to be 1440p60fps, and they better amp up the graphics like crazy because that's laughable

>Scam Citizen is $310 million

Attached: 1558170795391.jpg (970x545, 770.74K)

The death knell of every dev team

Attached: Obshitian.jpg (3243x1368, 1.6M)

Why does the one from 13 years ago look better?

halo 4 cortana was perfectly plump with a somewhat weird face
they must've went into overdrive diversity hiring between 4 and 5

The answer is on top of the image

>The Strength Diversity BRings to the Halo Universe
>Diverse
>All women
>Literally no Black people

hiring based on skill vs hiring based on what the employee looks like
firm reminder that lefties are the most hypocritical group of people on the planet

Diversity is FEMALE

Combine that with 4 differently specced consoles and 120fps supposedly being supported by a 4tflop machine and its all the perfect ingredients for development hell.
CP2077 is being delay to shit because of 7 year old consoles.

CDPR got it right. They parade around their Pajeets.

Attached: nu-CDPR.jpg (2318x5752, 2.73M)

I think the implication is actually that they completely fucked it up. Big budgets just mean development has been going on a long time (or massive marketing budgets, or they have big name actors doing voices, which infinite doesn't seem to have either), and a long development is a very bad thing.

Rumour is they scrapped what they had after the first 2 years of development because of the shitty response to Halo 5. So likely they were just basically making the sequel to Halo 5, keeping to the same artstyle, carrying on the story etc, while infinite is a soft reboot, and a completely different game I think to what they started on, all the way down to the artstyle so they probably couldn't even use many of the assets they had. Plus, they apparently decided to build a new engine for infinite. Which honestly, looks like it didn't go well.

What went wrong with Infinite's development?

Assuming this game turns out to be good, will I need to be caught up on the series to understand the story? I've only played 1-3. I might be willing to play ODST and Reach, but I really don't want to play 4 and 5.

At least they have the excuse of being Polish so there's very little ethnic minorities to choose from their hiring pool.
How does a American studio manage to force in a seemingly 99% female staff, but end up with 0% Blacks? If you were going based off of merit that latter % makes sense, but then if you were going off merit, most of the staff wouldn't be women either.

>halo 5 looking better than 360 Halo
Fuck no.

Attached: 976730_screenshots_20200630213810_1.jpg (2560x1440, 783.14K)

343.

????????
arkham knight was fucking kino.

Because they actually tailored the lighting to suit the game and art style.
Infinite had a shitty one-and-done'er lighting engine thrown in like all the other shitty 8th gen games. (see Just Cause, TLOU2, Homefront and Sniper GW4 for examples)
The combination of incompetent millenial devs and divsersity hires wasting timer are to blame for the shitty bandaid lighting engine.