Who else doesnt really give a shit about cars or the size of the map and would rather have a small vertical and very...

cringe

yakuza map is shit

cope

That doesn't make any sense. If you truly loved cars you'd want as many locations to visit as possible.

Attached: a city for ants.png (1594x587, 1.53M)

they needed an empty desert area so they can advertise up to 60fps on consoles

post pics of your wifes boyfriend

post pics of your feet

the best part of GTA's map is always the city, not the 420km2 of empty desert around the place.

no, i want a dense map ,, not an empty large one. a small map can still have roads

Size of the map doesn't matter. Its content does and the map is looking quite dense.
I honestly don't care about the cars, it's not a GTA and it's not important for me. I believe though that car customization will come sooner or later, multiplayer is definitely going to have it.

>we're totally not copying gta guys believe us

>it doesn't have to have a big map

i never asked for the game to be turned into gta V x madmax

well, you got a gta clone so dont feel too bad

they're not, but I wish they would, since rockstar are better

The only reason why people want a big map is probably because they spam the fast-travel in literally every games they play.
>Fallout 4 map is small
All the retards saying this don't play survival or use cheat mods to fast-travel.
From what i know W3 and Cyberpunk 2077 are bigger than FO4 but there's vehicles and Cyberpunk 2077 have alot more verticality and ladders too.
>b-but GTA5 and RDR2
Garbage games with empty maps of nothing of importance to ever visit. Same for FFXV.

At most, cars will be used like in GTA SA.
Basic upgrades and they boost your street cred, while in SA cars boosted respect and sex appeal.

>Cyberpunk 2077 have alot more verticality and ladders too
are you sure? they haven't really shown any verticality in the demos they've put out.

Rage 2 is DOOM x Madmax though.

if anything i think it'd feel like if ubisoft made a gta.

Size alone means fuck all to me. It’s all about how dense and what’s inside.

that's what she said

Attached: 1577275948146.gif (500x650, 839.16K)

Demos were all on ground levels. There's clips showing the verticality but of course out of a 50 floors skyscraper, we might be able to explore 10 out of the 50 floors and some main quest towers we might be able to explore the 70 floors.
I'm expecting loading screens and the skyscrapers to have their own loading cell to run properly when there's already 50 NPCs rendering around the skyscraper itself.
I have no clue how CDPR engine works but i'm expecting loading screens for better performance.

I'm more curious about the buildings and how many are enterable and how many floors are actually accessible

I rather have a smaller map and not use fast-travel 247.
I hope fast-travel is limited and there's tazis since underground metro isn't in the game?

It still seems pretty cool. A big empty map is worse than a small dense one. Besides that really isn't THAT small

It will either be part of the exterior cell or it will be part from an interior cell with a loading screen as the front door or once you get into an elevator like how it works in Fallout 4.
There's legit no way that everything is seamless without performance issues.
An exterior cell building could render 20 NPCs and an interior cell building could render 75 as an example.

Autists wants scam citizen or whatever the fuck name EVE Online? space game on PC map size.

If you're running it off a HDD maybe.

The delay for PS4 and Xbone was probably for converting exterior cells into interior cells as with fixing bugs that were due for patch 1.02 or something else.

If Ubisoft made it, the game would run at 720p and 15fps on base consoles with more bugs than the average Bethesda game lmao.

I don't even care cars, they could have the same 4 models copypasted, this isn't gta, I'd rather have a good cyberpunk aesthetic, not this bullshit.

Attached: file.png (1280x720, 1.38M)