It will be pretty hard to top Bloodborne

It will be pretty hard to top Bloodborne

Attached: elden.jpg (1280x720, 78.9K)

Yeah, even harder for them to top Sekiro.

Not really, you only think that because you need to desperately believe that your PS4 had more worth than being a Bloodborne box for seven years. It didn't.

>open world
>travel on your horse
>dialogue trees
>more focus on story
it won't even top dark souls 2

Attached: f5753870a40ccef114a6cb88e7f48531.jpg (680x680, 85.13K)

I could take a shit into my hands and then clap them together, and still top DS2.

Five whole years and still seething.

Attached: 1554531319391.png (332x378, 189.66K)

Even harder to make people even care about it, since everyone is weary of soulsshit.

your disproportional butthurtness towards dark souls 2 doesn't change the fact that it's still miles better than the average western triple A game

OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOHHH

I didnt even finish bloodborne it was that shit

>not really
>implying Elden Ring will be easily better than BB
That's a cope right there

They already did with Demon souls remake

it will be really hard to get in top 3 best fromsoft tiles, but it might be little bit better than ds3 and even sekiro.

sekiro is like top 4, elden ring having build variety alone will raise it over sekiro atleast for many players.

400 dollar box for bloodborne is totally worh it tho.

Fuck build variety, I want myltiplayer
BB had shit variety, but the pvp was so much fun and it was so fastpaced
Such a fucking shame that sekiro doesn't have a pvp mode

insightless nigger.

Sekiro is in the top 3 though
>inb4 des
It's putrid shit that people only liked because it was a ds3 exclusive, DS1 literally did everything better

balanced difficulty and super tight gameplay >>>>> build variety

Played 200+ hours of DS3 and I didnt even buy sekiro it was that shit

As well as
>having the online features that made your games better
>not being a linear 1 tap game not even worth watching