Whats Zig Forums's thoughts on valk chronicles 4?

Whats Zig Forums's thoughts on valk chronicles 4?

Attached: weeb xcom.jpg (322x149, 24.56K)

Great. Better gameplay and story than the first. However I liked the first one's heartwarming story more

I never finished the first but I saw gameplay of the 4th and its been on my wishlist since.
Got the first to try out the games and its pretty good.

I liked it but i wish they did something more than copy paste the first game, some missions needed something more dinamic, like the stealth one or the one with bombs dropping

Scouts are slightly better as they buffed everyone else, but the artillery and the trial and error strategy it forces is absolute cancer. Artillery and snipers have made the gunlances irrelevant too. The story is somehow even more stupid than the first game, but if you are into waifu pandering then there is plenty of that crap. The level design is better than 1, but is mostly ruined by the artillery and other stupid gimmicks which often don't work as intended.

I liked it a lot, but for some reason, the characters just don't stick with you as much as the first one does.

A disgrace to the VC franchise and a bastardization of the first game.
It killed the series for a reason.

>A disgrace to the VC franchise and a bastardization of the first game.
>meanwhile VC 2 and 3 had fucking maids with energy swords in the battlefield.

Best game in the series.

Raz is the fucking COOLEST

it made resetera seethe over the ass slap, thats a big plus in my book

Attached: Valkyria-Chronicles-4-Mar152018_16.jpg (1000x563, 146.65K)

>It killed the series
Zig Forums, for some reason, thinks that critically a acclaimed game (by both reviewers and people who play games) that also sold millions of copies more than any other entry in a franchise is 'the series dying'.

VC4 was a return to what the series was after the series randomly decided it was time to become a high school slice-of-life VN with battlefield knights. I've never been so glad for handheld versions to completely and utterly flop.

The story was better (a lot more normie and barely any fantasy but still good)

They nerfed Scouts and buffed Shocktroopers so now Scouts are useless and Shocktroopers are your main unit
Lancers are still useless (as they should)
Snipers are situational (as they should and just like the first game)
Engineers are a little more important because your tanks arent useless anymore
Grenadiers are amazing and are the reason why you will never use a Lancer

VC4 also has much better girls Minerva being Raita's magnum opus (Crymaria also better than Selvaria)

Attached: 1589219909688.jpg (1280x1496, 532.68K)

It’s bad but I love it

well done ignoring all the positive opinions and go straight to (you) the only shitpost in the thread

Would you defect for a loli?

>Slap
None of that pussy shit. It was a full on, handful ass cheek grab.
Absolutely chad move.

It's good. But it clearly shows the limit of the series.

As much shit is in VC2 and 3, I wish 4 had brought back gunners, or at least made their guns an option for shocktroopers.

>Lancers are still useless (as they should)
Why should they be useless?

pretty great and plenty of content

the story is also better than the first, unfortunately the devs obssesion with set pieces undermines the tactical potential of the battle system

i just started playing valkyria chronicles 1 and have to say it's pretty boring so far. when does it get good/more gameplay? also, any tips for a beginner?

I would kill for a loli

Boring, slow and useless class
Cant attack during enemies turn (unlike Grenadiers)
Class is either only anti infantry or only anti tank

one thing i didnt like is that they made hitting tank radiators without a tank or a lancer completely worthless

i loved pulling flanking maneuvers with scouts and shocktroopers in the first game and hitting tanks in the back with them, plus i played while the 60 FPS glitch was unpatched, and interception fire across the board was much more effective, so this was a risky tactic, but rewarding if you managed to pull it off

Almost picked it up last week until I saw it wasn't on sale, but I still haven't even finished the first one yet. I should really go and do that.

Looks like a fucking disgrace compared to the first game. Didn't even bother to pirate it.

VC1 is the only VC game worth playing, because if you've played VC1 then you've basically played VC2, 3, and 4, since the games are so insanely fundamentally similar that there's not really much of a difference outside of a few story beats.

Loved it

Only played VC4 and enjoyed it a lot. Interesting turn based warfare, but the characters/plot kind of plays like an anime. There are stakes, people die along the way, you're almost always against the wall, but very fun overall.

Attached: Leena_68480535_p0_master1200.jpg (800x800, 358.92K)

>Make changes to a series
>Zig Forums whines
>Make a game that's faithful to the original
>Zig Forums whines

anyone got the copy+paste on how to play VC3 translated?

just download the iso already patched

I skipped a lot of the story because there was just an ungodly amount of cutscenes. The gameplay was great though, it was just a buffet of the best missions from the first game with improvements.