Is the threat real?
well......I'm gay
Why did America elect such an old man to be president?
Yes, you are the threat sir.
yes, the commies infiltrated succesfully in the free world. just look at our social media, young people defending shitholes like cuba and venezuela, because they use cute words like "it's the people's oil!" or "the people's governament", they don't understand a fuck about economy, and once the old people (that lived through the cold war) die, we are very fucked up, and probably will succumb to the evil of communism. if you live in the US, try to go to a state with less gun regulations, arm yourself and get ready to shoot some commies, the free world future in on your hands
Yes, Mr. President. And the only way to stop it is to immediately grant citizenship to every illegal Mexican living in California. You can make this happen right now. The papers just need your signature. What do say Mr. President? Will you be the one to save America?
Is sneed real?
because he was a celebrity and americans are conditioned to worship whatever celebrity idol stooge that they are told, like the good little insects they are.
Hmm, sounds familiar. I can't quite place my finger on why though.
He had been a politician for a long while, debating RFK in 68. It's not like he was actually all that famous of an actor.
yeah, very odd, hahaha...
HOW TO FIGHT THE RED MENACE:
1- Allow citizens of the free world access to anti-tank and fully automatic weapons.
2- BAN ANY TYPE OF social democracy, "workers" party, socialism and communism symbols.
3- Encourage people to support mass killings of commies.
4- Kill all the politicians.
>Is sneed real?
based
>made speech at SS cemetery in Germany
There is nothing wrong with honoring men who fought and died in a war.
eurocucks have the most midwit opinions on anything.
>nazis
>men
>people
nazis and commies are subhuman. their lives are worthless
which is why americans cling to their european heritage and inventions identity and ingenuity and culture and countries despite americans being fast-food-engorged, mystery-meat mutts, right?
If you want to be an edgy retard, then that's cool. Regardless of how you feel about the NSDAP, they deserve to be treated with dignity.
Who?
Is this your brain on Zig Forums?
because he had great hair
Based
The problem is Reagan wanted to treat the secret police of Nazi Germany with "dignity" while directing the administration that attempted more coups and treated foreign peoples with less dignity than any other administration in US history.
Is Call of Duty a right-wing game?
>they deserve to be treated with dignity
It's brainless jingoism. Not so much intentionally right as something right wingers exploit in naive young people to make useful weapons out of them.
actually it was a regular german military cemetery, that had Waffen SS soldiers like most of them because towards the end of the war a good part of the german army was in this arm.
>Waffen SS
>secret police
retard
It's basically Unreal Tournament, but worse.
Which policies were the most disastrous for amerimuttland and the world, Nixon's or Reagan's?
Regan wins by volume, but Nixon completely fucked everything up by going off the gold standard and opening China up for outsourcing.
No, the main threat to world peace has always been America actually.
Yeah, I can get behind that.
We could have come back from Nixon, but Reagan was the one who fucked us so hard we can never recover.
>being this ass blasted
Seethe ahmed
Don't forget, amnesty which turned Cali blue. Bye-Bye 55 electoral votes, we hardly knew ye.
He wasn’t that popular as an actor, retard. And he was involved in politics For 20 years before being president
>nixon
Probably an assblasted spic from chile
Seethe more
Nixon and Reagan did nothing wrong
It's LBJ and the great society that destroyed this country
Nixon is directly responsible for outsourcing and Chinese trade deficit, retardo
yes, however chuck never existed.
What the war on poverty was intended to end was mass dependency on government. President Kennedy said, "We must find ways of returning far more of our dependent people to independence."
The same theme was repeated endlessly by President Johnson. The purpose of the "war on poverty," he said, was to make "taxpayers out of taxeaters." Its slogan was "Give a hand up, not a handout." When Lyndon Johnson signed the landmark legislation into law, he declared: "The days of the dole in our country are numbered."
Now, 50 years and trillions of dollars later, it is painfully clear that there is more dependency than ever.
Ironically, dependency on government to raise people above the poverty line had been going down for years before the "war on poverty" began. The hard facts showed that the number of people who lived below the official poverty line had been declining since 1960, and was only half of what it had been in 1950.
On the more fundamental question of dependency, the facts were even clearer. The proportion of people whose earnings put them below the poverty level — without counting government benefits — declined by about one-third from 1950 to 1965.
All this was happening before the "war on poverty" went into effect — and all these trends reversed after it went into effect.
Nor was this pattern unique. Other beneficial social trends that were going on before the 1960s reversed after other bright ideas of that decade were put into effect.
Massive "sex education" programs were put into schools, claiming that this was urgently needed to reduce a "crisis" of teenage pregnancies and venereal diseases. But teenage pregnancies and venereal diseases had both been going down for years.
The rate of infection for gonorrhea, for example, declined every year from 1950 through 1959, and the rate of syphilis infection was, by 1960, less than half of what it had been in 1950. Both trends reversed and skyrocketed after "sex education" became pervasive.