B-fags are bottom of the barrel soulless NPCs that lack an inner monologue

Sneed

Ding ding ding!

This. So much this.

Well done!

A fellow man of excellent taste i see.

Well done, old boy! Well done. You truly won the internet today

At the end of Portal 2, you shoot the moon. The portal doesn't behave any differently than stationary portals, despite the portals moving thousand of miles per hour relative to each other. It's clear that in universe the intent is A, but if we were to somehow make these portals in the real world it would probably be B.

whether you like it or not, portals are hula hoops. kys Btard

portals are literally just doors

The distance between each door is zero

My dad works at Aperture in real life and he says it's B please stop asking what that's what.

nobody has debunked it yet.

Attached: portal.png (1744x1266, 118.02K)

afags still relying on the stupid doorway analogy without acknowledging that portals don't work like that at all

what happens if the blue portal stops halfway, does the box get sucked through?

The box goes through at half the velocity, because only half of the momentum is applied to the cube

one portion of the block will have some velocity and the other don't, so the block will inevitably move. if it's shot out of the orange portal in this case depends on how far the blue portal stops and it's speed

Attached: 1607191229628.png (954x3842, 177.75K)

Another pleb filtered.Or a masterful bait to keep the smoothies going.

so you're saying it's impossible for the portals to exert any energy on the object passing through it because the movement is instantaneous

we can debate all you want, but anyone who use the door frame analogy should be disqualified from the thread.

portals don't work on physics
you are all retarded

B. he fell because of the wind current and because he got scared.

You could make the exact same arguments using this faulty logic by dropping a hula hoop on the cube, and you'd somehow arrive at the same conclusion. B-fags are retarded as always.

>velocity this velocity that
the cube is not moving you retard there is no velocity

does this mean that if a portal was moving sufficiently fast enough you could rip someones extended arm off with it?

the door analogy is valid but does not solve the problem. see

>a fags actually believe this

Attached: 1559842870349.webm (520x414, 254.07K)

Again, the answer is 10% intensity B

I don't care because I'm too fat to get through a portal

Dangerously based.

What are you even saying? The portals don't exert any energy in this situation. And how would you even relate any kind of exertion of energy to instantaneous travel? What about it is instantaneous?

A portal is merely a hole you braindead niggers

It doesn't matter how fast it comes at a stationary object

Correct

t. brainlet who doesnt know what relative velocity means

Tunelling devices, user. They're called tunneling devices for a reason in the game.

>look through portal
>entire world on the other side is moving at 500 mph relative to me
>Luckily AJesus will save me
ok bro

obviously his head would get hit and he would fall off

i don't give a fuck. if i drive a car past a tree the tree has relative velocity compared to me. does that mean it is moving? literally shut the fuck up before you embarrass yourself more

Hey B-nigger, what board are we on? VIDEO GAMES

And what is Portal? A VIDEO GAME.

B-niggers are so retarded they think real physics applies to video game logic. That webm is the objectively correct description of what happens in a video game with portals.

Imagine the cube as a series of horizontal slices

First Slice 1 goes through
Then Slice 2 tries to enter the same space Slice 1 is occupying. It is already taken so Slice 1 has to be pushed up.
At what speed? The speed of the portal

So B

It’s A unless someone posts proof that they have a PhD or Masters degree in Physics

can't portals not be on moving surfaces in the game?

Do it.

what we've stumbled across here, finally, after all these autistic years, is the core of the argument, the purely theoretical core

when the cube and the platform come out of the blue portal, it looks like it's moving fast, yes, but since this is science-fiction, it's purely your opinion if you think the platform is having forced applied to it when it appears out of the portal. the platform is attached to the floor, but how far does that extend? does the whole building fly out of the portal? why would the cube fly off and the platform remain still?

whether or not the cube moves is entirely opinion as no real world physics can ever prove this and also suggests portals may only ever exist in fiction, since when it's moving through a portal, what counts as the anchor point? either way, i look forward to many more autistic years of these threads

they were on the moving panels that you used to cut the neurotoxin

Portal 2. Neurotoxin tubes, and you shoot the moon at the end

You obviously are a complete fucking lost cause braindead cripple and I'm probably wasting my time, but the law of conservation of momentum and special relativity both show that the object must retain the speed of a moving portal. Also, the portals are not "holes".

> does that mean it is moving?
yes, in your frame of reference. you can only state that the tree is stationary if you observe it from it's frame of reference. there is no such thing in the universe as a absolutely stationary frame of reference, and your idea of how relative motion works contradicts not onyl basic high-school level kinematics but also relativity.
leave this board and study some physics, brainlet.

>just sitting on the grass
>see a hula hoop falling from the sky towards me
>it’s big enough that none of the outside ring hit me thank god that would’ve hurt
>suddenly start flying into the sky
>mfw

The fact one "side" of the door can move while the other is still should tell even a smoothie like you that they're not just doors.

>moving a hula-hoop over a cube really fast makes it fly out the other side

Yes, it is moving relative to your position as an observer

although, portals are never seen moving like in the picture, facing the direction they are moving, so who knows how that works.

There is no "slices" or fucking teleportation or any sort of momentum relativity going on. The portals simply creates a tunnel between two coordinates in your defined space with no distance between exit and entry point. Regardless how you look at it, it's basically just a hole, a holla-hoop, a tunnel. Nothing gets pushed up, sliced or teleportet.

The moon sequence breaks this idea. The moon is moving at a drastically different speed and direction then earth, yet you arent thrown from earths speed off the moon. The portals are clearly more than "just a hole"

frame of reference doesn't matter here. there is nothing accelerating the cube's matter through space. also, your example is incredibly retarded because you split the orange and blue portals into 2 frames of reference, but by definition the portals are the same location in space. the cube while passing through the portal is in one single location, one single frame of reference. your entire argument falls apart from the start

No. All of the momentum is applied to half the cube

Attached: file.png (738x368, 16.7K)

>yet you arent thrown from earths speed off the moon
but you are

It’s B because the wind pressure would throw the guy off the chair just like the box that gets lifted off.
Afags literally can’t refute this.

The cube moving up to go through the portal is the same as the portal moving down onto the cube. If you envision the cube's movement through space relative to the orange portal, then the answer is obviously B.

Yes and no. It WOULD be a good reference is the hoolahoop was going through a box that was floating and had no ground beneath it. The hoop would keep falling at -10m/s. Basically that situation only continues to prove B to work.