According to DF, the The Xbox Series X|S specs are so bad they aren't even gonna bother doing an outright comparison to PC. PC games and PS5 will be the only games to be compared because PS5 is the only one with similar specs to a very high PC gaming machine.
According to DigitalFoundry recent reports, the PS5 can play 4k games at VERY HIGH and is ON PAR WITH PCs costing over $1500.
Based on tests with a 2080 Ti, it looks like a 2080 Super or RTX 3060 Ti would be required to match or exceed PlayStation 5's output.
>According to DigitalFoundry recent reports, the PS5 can play 4k games at VERY HIGH and is ON PAR WITH PCs costing over $1500. Yeah but they used fucking AC Valhalla for testing.
Dylan Carter
Imagine being such a lying faggot, they never said that. I wanna see you doing this kind of retarded threads once they fully use the new xbox devkit.
Dylan Edwards
The only reason my lesbian gf hasn't dumped me is because I accept to take it up the ass when we're having sex. Any advices on how to handle my relationship?
David Richardson
Ps5 is a 2060 super please cope
Benjamin Hughes
It's the closest thing we have for something next gen, and it's multiplat
And Ubisoft has a history of shitting the bed with their PC ports. >Watch Dogs PC was neutered so that PC has parity with the console versions. >Removing DRM caused AC Origins to run much better >Watch Dogs Legion's source code leak had pic related
Nigga, it's fucking ubiSHIT. Wait till real fucking devs put a game out and then start doing your "comparison".
Adrian Butler
Call of Duty PC BTFOs both of them.
Jaxon Johnson
They couldn't even wait for AC Valhalla to be cracked before doing a comparison. Console warriors are comparing PC to consoles using AC without even knowing UbiSHIT's history with PC ports.
Jace Myers
And Cold War / DMC SE aren't? Or they don't count cuz SeX shits on PS5 in Native 4K ? Holy desperate.
RDNA1Station is finally appearent when it comes to ray tracing. Lol. But DX12 sucks. Microsoft is full of pajeets.
Eli Gomez
Using Ubishit to prove your point is akin to grasping for straws. You're digging for the bottom of the barrel to justify your purchase. Why can't you Sonyfags just shut up and enjoy your games?
Anthony Morgan
This has been debunked, only happens in one scene.
Nolan Bennett
use your brain, he already said alpha effects were lower than what u can set on pc, and cloth animations are lower framerate, both of those are heavily in use in that cinematic
Jaxon Nguyen
So were Teraflops like a fake metric or something? How did this happen
John Flores
DF forgot to factor in the fact 2080TI costs far more than anything in the 3000 series, and ignoring the Denuvo performance tax since they're making the comparison on an AssCreed game.
Aiden Butler
>RTX 3060 Ti would be required to match or exceed PlayStation 5's output. So the budget card of the 30xx family can exceed the PS5? Feels good.
Brayden Powell
First, you're lying OP. DF never said the SeX is weaker than the PS5. It's objectively, in every literal sense of this worse, better with the exception of the SSD. Secondly, this is just one game. Other anos already proved you wrong with RayTracing on other games. Thirdly, Vallhalla runs like shit on Nvidia. AMD fairs much better. A 6800 almost beats a 3090.
It's a shit game programmed shitly.
Austin Bennett
And given the Xbox has similar issues to the PC issues - is the the Xbox version the same as the PC version?
Elijah Lewis
no idea but I'm sure he could have tried to edit the config files but is too much of a brainlet to do that
Lincoln Reyes
Wow, the 2060S can run an unoptimized Ubisoft game at 1440p and very high settings while running Denuvo DRM AND Virtual PC DRM at the same time? I wonder how well it can run the cracked release of AC Valhalla. Somebody should make the comparison.
Luke Peterson
ya and the fire is lower quality + swaying cloth (sails as well) animations are limited to 30 fps on PS5
Aaron Brown
No it's the difference between real devs who optimize their games and incompetent fucks who slap dYnAmIc ReSoLuTiOn on it and call it a day
Owen Allen
It's DirectX. The devs messed up their DirectX12 code. This is why it runs worse on the SeX. It's not surprising, many Vulkan and DX12 games on PC run like garbage with stutter out the ass and poor performance - Detroit, Quantum Break, Battlefield 1 to name a few. It's no the API's fault but it's probably proving difficult to code for. In Vallhalla's case it doesn't help that they got to toy around with PS5 dev kit much sooner. I'm betting the game served as a basis to learn the PS5 better and PC/SeX were a bit left out.
Bentley Carter
Yes. Teraflops is a performance metric of how much float points operations a GPU can do. Gaming uses more things like texture mapping, streaming, geometric transformations and more. So basically isn't worthy for gaming
Kevin Fisher
>Teraflops a fake metric Yes. It's a marketing term that was picked up in 7th gen gaming since triangles per second and shader fill rates fell out of style. Sony used it heavily since the PS3 was having a difficult time running multiplats over the 360 despite being released a year later.
>First, you're lying OP. DF never said the SeX is weaker than the PS5. It's objectively, in every literal sense of this worse, better with the exception of the SSD.
So, why is every game generally performing better on PS5?
>NBA 2K21 >4K on both XSX and PS5, same visual fidelity. >Dips to 59 fps sometimes on XSX in normal camera, buttery smooth 60fps on PS5. >Dips and stays at ~56 fps on XSX using a camera that shows the entire arena, buttery smooth on PS5 on the same setting.
>AC:Valhalla >To achieve PS5's 60fps performance, XSX lowest dynamic resolution has to be 1180p compared to PS5's 1440p. >Otherwise, XSX dips to 46-48fps in areas where PS5 plays at 60 fps (pre-patch).
>Dirt 5 >Worse performance in 60fps mode on XSX compared to PS5 >Worse image quality in 120fps mode on XSX compared to PS5
>DMC >120fps is much much better perfromance-wise on PS5 than on XSX, as much as close to 40 fps difference. >XSX literally plays better on RT mode in one scene
>CoD: Cold War >XSX plays 3 scenes better on RT mode, literally few seconds worse performance on PS5 in comparison >PS5 performs better in 120fps mode, especially the helicopter scene
>Borderlands 3 >Higher graphical fidelity with better performance on PS5
>Immortal >Birds are singing that it's native 4K on PS5, dynamic 4K on XSX, in performance mode both run on dynamic, but higher on PS5
Software. The hardware is legitemately better. You can check the specs yourself. It's purely down to software. Just like AMD's drivers were complete garbage and their OpenGL performance is still weaker than a low end Nvidia card.
Blake Baker
I figure most of Series X not performing as well/better in most cases is due to development budget being split for that platform between X & S, vs. PS5 just having the same hardware for both its SKUs.
Chase Lopez
Oh, I get it Tera fl(oating point) op(eration)s. That's a dumb name. If they had called it FPOPS they would have made people google it. Instead people assume a "flop" is some gaming thing
Are you this tiger faggot? Why do you care? PS5 will be lead console this gen whether it is performs better than Xsex or not. Corporate tribalism is the dumbest shit ever
David Rivera
>b-b-but its just one scene
Levi Barnes
>that comment section Holy cancer
Julian Rogers
>PS5 will be lead console this gen whether it is performs better than Xsex or not And it's easy to understand why. The Xbone was Microsoft's Saturn, Sega CD and X32 combined.
