Yo can you imagine if Cyberpunk was made by a talented dev?
Yo can you imagine if Cyberpunk was made by a talented dev?
rdr2 was dogshit awful
You mean GTA6 when it comes out in 40 years?
no it wasn't
No because rockstar is actually talented and cyberpunk is so generic. They would never do it because they are better than that
it might be "awful" for you. but it is a quality game. one of the best at what it aims to do.
yes it was
Why did you post an unrelated pic
These guys would've probably done an actual RPG
game of the decade friend, sorry you're to dumb to grasp and enjoy it. Well you'll always have Zig Forums and r/gaming to shitpost on, right?
>Rockstar
>talented dev
You absolute joke of a subhuman
the Houser brothers are gone from R*, RDR2 is the last true Rockstar title we'll have user.
yes it was. fuck you.
>Yo can you imagine if Cyberpunk was made by a talented dev?
Larian sucks fat dick
And it got buried by God of War
If CDPR was Rockstar the game coming out in a few days would be a TW3 port for PS5 and Xbox Series X, and Cyberpunk wouldn't even be announced.
I have probably 200hours in the game and I maybe experienced 5 bugs total, too few to mention anyways. Find me one review of RDR2 that mentions bugs, they're as non existent as you can get from a vidya. CP2077 literally has a bug happening every 60 seconds.
>Find me one review of RDR2 that mentions bugs
Nigger, almost no review mentions bugs of any game.
AC Unity was maybe the most broken game in this gen and the backlash was so hard because no one mentioned how broken it was, not even reviewers.
But if there was a dev out there who actually cared and had actual love for the original tabletop RPG it would've probably been something interesting, instead we get a Borderlands/GTAV clone with minor RPG elements
What a missed opportunity
in your deluded head only.
stop arguing with these fags they didn't even play the game.
>I have probably 200hours in the game
Jesus, my condolences
than name ONE reoccurring bug in the whole game.
It would have less bugs, but the gameplay would be even slower and clunkier, and the singleplayer would feel unfinished due to focusing most resources on a microtransaction-bait online mode meant for zoomers addicted to doing meaningless busywork in games.
Well, for one thing, it wouldn't be a first-person shit turd
It quite literally lost out to GoW imagine being Rockstar, releasing what should be the biggest game of the year, and getting royally assfucked by Snoy
>I get my vidya opinions from streams and Zig Forumstards, the post.
Thanks for the nut
>It quite literally lost out to GoW imagine being Rockstar
lost what? where?
Larian is better than most AAA studios.
Since when did the fucking gaming awards become relevant lmao. RDR2 sold like crazy and everyone sucked its dick
What, RDR2 is a trainwreck because of how atrocious the gameplay feels.
It's as if they saw TLOU2's gameplay demos and went
>man, wouldn't it be nice if instead of making a fun and responsive game we put all the focus on the animations, no matter how much this might slow down the game
Not to mention that there's design choices that actively slow down the game for no reason at all, like not allowing you to run in the camp.
the only half decent game they made is DOS
>award shows
>for video games
god help you if this is how you evaluate the worth of a video game.
>what are mods
>what's a PC
RDR2 = most unecessary game and sequel in the history of sequels. It's narrative was absolute dogshit, I remember most streamers being bored throughout the story. Rockstarfags had to beg streamers multiple times to finish the game. Nobody had to beg anyone to complete GoW
glad your filthy buttonmashing hands didn't touch this masterpiece. Stick to DMC. bye
It's exactly how rockstarfags evaluate games until your shit game got absolutely destroyed. Now they don't matter, seethe and cope
>*Makes Divinity clone with cyberpunk aesthetic*