Game barely works

>game barely works
>91
Why is this allowed?

Attached: 1607505794388.png (245x316, 108.75K)

Notice Zig Forums never balks at this stuff when it's Nintendo or Sony, but now all of a sudden it's breaking news

Allowed by who?

>what is skyrim

Paid reviews

>Notice Zig Forums never balks at this stuff when it's Nintendo or Sony
this is expected for the game industry in general

i was trying to tell people not to get their hopes up for this just because you should expect it to happen to anything big really

once a lot of money starts being involved in something then you've got a lot of (((shareholders))) fucking it up and exploiting shit as much as possible

Attached: BLACKED.jpg (794x464, 69.71K)

Imagine what it would have been like if it had released in April kek

because they can be payed off.
Unless you implement the death penalty for fraud, these corporate shills can and will lie to your face about anything they get payed for.

Because it's far from "barely works". I swear to god, people today have no idea what an actually buggy game is like. Or everyone's going on already dated early release without playing them game for themselves.

Attached: amashing.jpg (165x178, 5.72K)

the CDPR bonus

Unironically, I just got done playing for 10 hours straight and only had one gamebreaking bug that made me have to reload to a save seconds before; other than that, I noticed minor animation glitches and one UI bug that fixed itself. Maybe I'm lucky. I was playing RDR2 and I unironically had more bugs in my 3 hour session before playing Cyberpunk. Hopefully they wheel out a patch or two in the next couple weeks.

Nice attempt at a sentence.

money

if this game had come out in the mid to late 00's it would have been obliterated at launch like Vampire: Bloodlines or Dark Messiah was

patch culture has made developers and critics complacent, the truth is CDPR has your money now and has no reason to actually fix any of the broken shit in their games. Have fun waiting for the official unofficial fan patch

Damn if only they had another month! This game would have been perfect!!

Based on the gameplay video I've seen it's about as stable as Fallout 76 was on release.
And unlike 76 it doesn't have network problems to blame for most of them.

They only gave out PC review copies.

No, not really what I'm saying but if you wanna make a strawman to get mad at, go ahead.

It's a broken mess but it has soul so it's 9/10

take your meds incel loser

>be diversity Spiderman
>have great graphics
>decent combat
>open world city
>lots of people
>fast loading
>quality and performance mode
>just announced patch with raytracing+60fps coming soon

Why aren't you joining the winning side Zig Forums?

Attached: milesbr-1595711255203.jpg (1280x720, 113.36K)

The game feels like an open beta.

I don't care about Spidernigger.

>Robot voice: must defend corporate project. >:v/
Damn look like the real cyberpunk 2077 was us all along

>Some bugs

Because no one will stop them and the lying works.

It works fine on a high end PC and is a great game, anything else though it's broken, they will probably fix it judging by the support TW3 got post launch, but right now it is early access for most people, though for a high end PC owner who likes eurojank it's great pirate it.

>Zig Forums never balks at this stuff when it's Nintendo
True
>or Sony
False

Its pretty open secret that CDPR paid reviewers off

Don't zoomers remember Crysis? This is childsplay in comparison.
Also there would be less complains if half of you faggots weren't trying to run it on toasters.

Keep defending an unfinished gta clone

>Notice Zig Forums never balks at this stuff when it's Nintendo or Sony
what fucking games do they make that "barely work" on release?

Reviewers always ignore bugs in new games because they just assume they're going to get fixed soon and they don't want their reviews to "age badly" after the bugs get patched.