I7-7700

>i7-7700
>RTX 2070 Super
>32gb DDR4 2400
>Raytracing maximum preset
>DLSS balanced
>55-65fps@1440p

somehow Zig Forums is convcinced this looks anything other than gorgeous

dont buy consoles

Attached: asdasdasd.jpg (2560x1440, 976.63K)

Attached: cbe17710-fb4c-49bd-9c60-0fa80fc8bdea.jpg (1600x900, 387.61K)

I'll be playing on Stadia. Zig Forums probably thinks that's pretty "lame" but guess what

I've felt the warmth of a girl's pussy around my dick

3

Attached: c3ff95e6-bdb6-445b-b782-4873e6a8e0c1.jpg (1600x900, 264.38K)

I didn't see much of a performance impact from bumping DLSS up to quality and it reduces the "everything is covered in bugs" effect

4

Attached: cfdd540f-2b07-4a07-b898-02a088778cef.jpg (1600x900, 239.04K)

It looks like any other shitty open world game. Look at that NPC in your pic. I bet if you bump into her, she says some generic sassy comment.

5

Attached: 48160075.01_image.jpg (2560x1440, 889.87K)

looks alright i guess but do you expect me to blow $3k on a gaming pc to play that?

Doubt.

Attached: 57.png (1728x972, 76.73K)

my machine is worth 1200 bux at most.

>DDR4 2400
lol

>RTX 2070 Super
>Ryzen 7 3700X
>64gb DDR4 3600mhz
>Everything at max but lighting on ray tracing (medium)
>DLSS Auto
>55~65 fps @ 1080p

I'm dropping this shit until they fix it.

I've had ONE good run when I launched it this morning, where I had the exact same settings but got 110~120 fps. Surprise, I've closed the game 10mins after and it never ran with the 120fps again.

This is why playing at launch is always a fucking stupid idea.

>delay the game 3 times
>still have a shit launch
gj cdpr

Attached: 123669818_1709565772531311_4017405766455273890_n.jpg (356x404, 18.85K)

pic related

retard

Attached: fuckspeccy.png (640x577, 90.69K)

red dead 2 looks and runs better
half life alyx in vr looks and runs better

That lighting sucks so much balls. Raytrace my ass.

>implying this needs more than 50fps tp be enjoyable

gee this board sure has become a memefactory

And why play it @50fps when I should be playing @120?

Have you ever tried 120fps on a screen that supports it user? I assure you it's a much more enjoyable experience.

Attached: 9ff659ca4842b58cda27551bfa7f1bb1ce016d8960236b4d0752d4d45229f76c.jpg (599x473, 83.59K)

meant to

Attached: 123435036_1303284326677348_6378348613809969467_n.jpg (300x271, 10.44K)

>rtx 3080
>Raytracing: OFF
>DLSS: ON

Attached: 1590735604611.jpg (1200x675, 87.15K)

plebs piss and moan all day long but in the end they're all just miserable losers that deserve to be where they are.
Don't fucking complain that your game looks shit if you play on a console.

No one is actually impressed, this board being filled with incels is actually a meme.

>DLSS

call me when this meme joke ends

a? as in just one? impressive. lol

It's free performance and free AA making it look better. why wouldn't you turn it on?

because my amd gpu doesnt support it

ok retard

It looks like a gorgeous 2013 game.

its an fps shooter, those are best played at 144

I'm thinking of GeForce Now, at least it lets you play it if you have it on Steam and you don't have to buy it twice.

dont lie. I have everything almost similar and the game is around 35fps on average with raytracing on low or turned off. With max preset its around 20

Sleeping dogs & Watch dogs look better.

retard spotted

post rig

retard

hypernormalization

He was doubting you got that fps, not that you had those specs, you idiot.

genius

>that moment when you dont know if troll or legit retrardation

Attached: 1606937159885.gif (300x354, 436.55K)

Same exact specs here but I have rtx turned off
The game is amazing
Only have had 5 visual bugs my entire 9 hours of nonstop playthrough
Shazam was wrong
Fuck console cucks they deserve a broken game. Works perfect for me

Looks worse than Athens in Odyssey and with 3x worse performance.