refuses to release or announce any new games

gtav was good it just had a shitty unfinished story

And yet there's nothing wrong with GTAO aside from unrealized potential, they were retarded for kicking the benz out over it

Benzies had nothing to do with RDR2, he worked on RDR fixing the shitty codebase so it could meet the deadline.

They were, but only because Dan didn't like it either. That decision probably wasn't exactly popular within Rockstar and it doesn't surprise me Dan left as soon as RDR2 was finished. I don't think he has any interest in MP games, he's probably the biggest movie-fag out Rockstar had.

If 2077 taught me anything, it takes time and actual competence(something not on display for 2077) to make a quality modern open world game

they literally released a new game two years ago. if you want yearly releases go play EA sports games.

You're right, my bad.

dont expect anything anytime soon after 2 of the big 3 are gone

See

I still think that they should do something like The Orange Box with original games made by Toronto, North, San Diego and Leeds, as an experiment so they can have potential new IPs.

I hope they go back to making Lemmings

it's on online, you need to play online for prequel story lmao

>Every other open world feels like fucking plastic compared to what R* puts out.
Imagine liking Rockstar open worlds instead of actual games that utilizes open world mechanics down to their cores such as Breath of the Wild and MGSV.

Attached: GTA_series.png (842x1019, 199.29K)

Sony owns the IP.

RDR2 has a literal core system to mess around with, derp.

RDO still gets updates.
The single-player is mostly ignored though, even though there are still a few annoying bugs left.

They have other IPs (Max Payne, Midnight Club, Bully, Manhunt, etc.) but they only want to focus on their two biggest ones it seems, likely owing to the huge development cycles that go into them.

> another retard that doesn't know the missions are just supposed to be mini-movies
It's been like this in GTA since forever. Freedom is for the open world, in the missions you do whatever the fuck R* thinks is most cinematic, and MAYBE if you're lucky, they'll give you 2 choices on how to go about it. This is just how R* makes their games.

The Divison games are pretty good.

RDR2 is even worse than GTA games when it comes to open world stuff. Open world literally enhances nothing about the story game tries to tell.

It also tells you something else: Do not announce/tease a game way before it's finished. Wait until you are sure it's gonna be done and announce 1-1,5 years before at max. I bet we'd have gotten '77s current release date if they waited until last year with announcing additionally you could've delayed once more without too much backlash.

1997-2013. That's all that counts in Rockstar history. If they don't fix the sluggish gameplay in the next game, I'm done with them. Fuck, I've been donw with them since V.

nah

Why these games are open world in the first place then?

they’re just going to milk gta online to death after the failure that was rdo

Literally only activity you can do in open world is hunting animals. Which is most boring activity to do in the game itself.

Why not?

>derp
kys

Attached: 1552516001275.jpg (406x454, 80.42K)

nah

I like all 3. Rockstar provides a more production value, heavy simulated experience that MGSV and BotW doesn't supply. While as BotW and MGSV have a more arcady open world experience. I like jumping between different design choices.