RTX ON

>RTX ON
>raytraced lighting high

30fps

Attached: rtx_lighting_high.jpg (2560x1440, 651.8K)

>RTX ON
>raytraced lighting medium

35fps

Attached: rtx_lighting_medium.jpg (2560x1440, 636.33K)

>RTX ON
>raytraced lighting off

40fps

Attached: rtx_lighting_off.jpg (2560x1440, 654.5K)

>30fps with RT on high (not ultra/psycho) at 1440p
lol maybe try spending more than $99 on a GPU

>RTX ON

Attached: 1446484800188.png (300x384, 171.87K)

>RTX OFF

77fps

Attached: rtx_off.jpg (2560x1440, 666.27K)

This doesn't look any better than the last Deus Ex games.

Attached: 1587454795849.jpg (480x259, 27.18K)

rtx is such a meme

>RTX ON
>raytraced lighting psycho

22fps

Attached: rtx_lighting_psycho.jpg (2560x1440, 640.22K)

Looks better imo

The thing is, what does ray tracing even do? Now Ray tracing shadows I notice. That actually makes shadows caused by buildings to looks so much more real, but I cannot tell the difference between RTX on or off. Or, rather, I can notice a small difference, but I can't notice exactly what it is.

Literally only makes Minecraft look different. Just an FPS killer in any other game. Not worth 30fps in Cyberpunk for that meme.

>50fps difference between these

RTX is a meme
also what the fuck is this engine doing

the fuck am I looking for?

>tanking 3/4 of your framerate for this difference

Attached: subtle.png (798x609, 701.02K)

Everyone knows RTX is a massive FPS sucker. You'll lose a good 30-40 FPS by turning on ray-tracing. It isn't worth it and the RTX in Cyberpunk is garbage. They didn't even try. Even fucking Spider-Man has better ray-tracing in it.

Attached: rtx is a meme.png (872x1391, 2.38M)

The difference for me is the shadows. RTX definitely creates more real, more immersive shadows, just no way around it. The lighting I could do without, but the realistic shadows are choice. Now is it worth 30fps? Idk.

Attached: better shadows.jpg (2256x1440, 695.94K)

>RTX ON
>game story still sucks

At least use good example images OP. RTX lighting and reflections are much more prominent when looking at subtle examples and softer lighting. Neon bullshit is easy to emulate.

Attached: unknown (1).png (988x556, 859.67K)

Attached: rtx on.png (1764x802, 2.97M)

RTX ON 60 FPS

Attached: RTX ON 60FPS.png (1202x676, 1.18M)

>taking a 50 FPS hit for worse-looking, blown-out lighting
People will unironicallly buy anything to feel superior to others, won't they?

RTX off...

Attached: Cyberpunk 2077 Screenshot 2020.12.13 - 03.32.29.50.png (1152x648, 1.36M)

RTX on. Woah...

Attached: Cyberpunk 2077 Screenshot 2020.12.13 - 03.33.44.96.png (1152x648, 1.4M)

Nice!

rtx makes the game look great and all, if its worth the 50-60% performance drop is up to everyone themselves

RTX removes the dumbasss screenspace effects, so it's worth any performance.

This one genuinely does look a lot better

People always think about the reflections with RTX but it’s the shadows and the way lighting interacts with surrounding textures and models, also the fact it replaces ambient occlusion with a better alternative is great

It looks more realistic than this