Yep, it's shit

Maybe next time focus on game development instead of identity politics, CDPDead

Attached: in.jpg (674x725, 136.88K)

But it's at 90?

I want to have sex with Rogue.

kek, never heard of paid reviews.....

lol the 90% female sjw art team are responsible for the best part of this game, which is the environment

So you're saying the user score was paid for by competitors to make it lower, while the critic score is an accurate representation?

But it's 90% that's critical acclaim
And we've also heard of review bombing. User score = useless, and what "identity politics", V literally sides with and defends cops in this game lol

look at this stupid faggot. look at him and laugh. Yeah, its at 90 you dense prick. We can all see that - but what other numbers can you see in that screenshot? Its almost as if you're being dense deliberately so as to purposefully miss the point, you STUPID DICKHEAD GO FUCK YOURSELF.

yep they paid 16000 people to shit on 57 critics.. go dilate somewhere else you mongoloid cretin.

>review bombing
someday you'll grow up kid.

Nice, it's the sex number.

>NOOOOOOO THE CRITICS ARE ALL PAID LETS LISTEN TO THE INCEL FAGGOT CHANNERS WHO REVIEW BOMB GAMES BECAUSE THEY WERE TRIGGERED BY "POLITICS"
Yeah no, mate.

you have to be 18 to post here.

16,000 reviews could all be one person.

so you listen to those who are paid to say its good other than the opinion of real people...

Cybercuck employees on Zig Forums again, damage control should be in the medium of patches, not e-trannies scouting forums...

User reviews aren't any better. Dark Souls 2 has a higher user score than Dark Souls Remastered.

User score is legitimately worthless because in high profile releases where people have agendas beyond sincere criticism there are bound to be disingenuous highs and lows all over. I have 0 investment or interest in Cyberpunk, but pointing at metacritic always gets me heated.

lmao nobody has that kind of money to be paying off every critic, you sound like dumb kid. One day you will grow the fuck up and stop blaming people disagreeing with you on imaginary trannies and conspiracy.

Surely the truth doesnt lie somewhere in the middle. Faggot shill, go away.

Im having fun and there nothing you can do about it faggot.

Why are good games never "review-bombed"? It's always the games you have vested interests in. Also where are the 8 million+ happy customers cdpr is lying about to drawn these measly 4000 unhappy ones? Learn statistics.

>Instead of identity politics
You can dislike how the game came out without showing you really don't like Cyberpunk and ironically want just future GTA, only not graphically.

>everyone who doesn't like the game are incels
>even though you can hear people complaining about this game in every corner of the internet
(you)

because the remaster was pointless when there was DSfix years before that gave the same upgrade... people had to pay to get better graphics while maintaining PVP/Coop.

Cyberpunk 2077 is good though.

this is some next level cope

Yes bugs. And rightfully so. Not you morons review bombing because muh sjws or women employees lmao

>Why are good games never "review-bombed"?

Attached: Screenshot_20201214-174037_Chrome.jpg (864x1023, 199.54K)

You can like the game without showing your a cuckold and defending their identity politics.

Attached: huik.jpg (1000x593, 366.05K)

16k reviews .... 1 person.

>thy sides do spliteth...

They literally called the game sjw once because Keanu's character was a leftist who wanted to destroy the corps. That's how you know these are children who don't even know the themes of cyberpunk

lmao. the copening. This is the last game these trannies will ever make.

Attached: 313218978978931.gif (220x124, 125.8K)

>Not you morons review bombing because muh sjws or women employees lmao
OP is a moron, but let's not pretend that this game deserves a 90 because it doesn't.

Is this why 95% of the women in it are absolute trogs?

>walking simulator
>sips soi
>ehm, how about this game...

>69
based desu

What does this have to do with the game though? Again they don't even ever shit on cops in the game, V literally during River's questline defends cop you fragile shit lol

Anyone defending the current state of the game is a huge faggot, and it once again shows that reviewers are genuinely worthless in their opinions. I actually do think that the game will be pretty good after maybe a year, but a 6.9 rating as of this moment is generous even. This game is an unoptimized buggy mess with a terrible economy and crafting system. The only saving grace is its story, decent combat and characters. It's not last of us 2 terrible, but it comes close.

Kojima was right, most Americans are too stupid for DS

walking simulator. cope.

highs and low scores... yes... but the AVERAGE of those is low... basic maths dicate that the majority of those votes would be low...

infact let me check...

yup... mostly low

Only outlet that's actively bickered about the game is GiantBomb, and they didn't even do a review of it.

This is what you're upset about? Holy shit. White fragility is real.

Funny thing because he wants to be an american so bad

never forget that

1) Zig Forums is a bunch of literal kids. Like...actual kids who in school. their opinions will never matter
2) vocal minority.
3) none of those hatefags were gonna buy the game anyways
4) most of them either have shitty PC and don't have any consoles
5) a lot of polfags who hate game for pink hair/lgbt and they also werent gonna buy it anyway

never listen to Zig Forums

User score matters more

>kojimbo cocksuckers still at it

its like they didnt have a fucking HUGE marketing budget...do you not realise that paying people regarding reviews is considered within a budget for marketing you sap

>It's not last of us 2 terrible
We still in denial about TLOU2 being a masterpiece huh?

this.

Both numbers are pretty garbage because review aggregators are inherently bad. Quantitative criticism is bad. If any of you legitimately use this website to tell you if game good/game bad, neck yourself.

It's the Bioshock infinite of the 2020's. Hailed as a masterpiece by critics and then forgotten within a year.

>the vehicle physics are so bad that decade+ old concepts like pop-able tires that effect driving performance are too advanced for the CDPR dev team

Attached: 2ce2693b566136af5f9eb8a4b81e7ee2.jpg (1176x1800, 486.98K)

>User score matters more
They're irrelevant. Mostly because the average unqualified human is a dumbass.

Score is 90 if you haven't played good open world games like gta5 or red Dead series
Score is 60 if you've played those and were expecting even the slightest bit of shit to do in an open world city made in 2020
You can't even gamble or do actual crinimal things like rob banks

>he thinks journalist opinion matters more than player opinion
point and laugh etc

Just means there are more people disingenuously bombing it than shilling it on the user end.

And in case there was any ambiguity in my post, I'm not supporting critic scores either for obvious reasons, but that's not really what the thread's about so I didn't bother clarifying. Metacritic sucks all around.

Why is Zig Forums trying to push 7/10 as bad?

Attached: Cat.png (1200x600, 1.19M)

I absolutely fucking despise how the difficulty is handled in this game. You either get ridiculously easy and trivial missions that are a breeze or you face off against enemies with absolutely asinine HP pools that can 2 shot you with NO INBETWEEN and NO INDICATION as to which enemy is fucking OP as shit or a total joke. This is the most grating part of the game for me, combat should at least be challenging without being a retard sponge fest

Attached: 1607469730592.jpg (798x601, 350.64K)