I want to dominate, not get dominated. Why are you retards such massive cucks? Females were meant to be ruled...

Every form of relationship involves a power dynamic. Don't lie to yourself.

Yet these groups had a dominant leader. Furthermore, said groups waged war agaist other groups.

Going against nature is what we've been doing since mankind discovered fire and started using tools, the logical conslusion is to reverse everything we have now. Now bend over.

no matter how strong you think you are. you are weak if your values aren't based on truth and light.

the constant fetishization of dominance and submission sickens me to the core. It's so obvious and pathetic why people constantly think about it.
The domineering want to be validated and feel powerful by controlling others. the submissive are pathetic and degnerate and want to be babied by someone stronger. But both are two sides to the same coin. both throw away what is right and useful to them and both's actions and desires are impure.

both are near sighted and shallow. Low and depraved. Destructive and cruel. Pure disgrace.

Everything you said is bullshit.

Humanity's ability to employ the tools he discovers/builds is indicative of its intelligence: a natural tool developed throughout evolution.

Pure slave-master morality. Die already and let the worms eat your body, scum.

I am the degeneracy

Because everyone, no matter race, gender or sexuality should be free

No, they didn't do that
They promised them either riches or a glorious death in battle, and fought like their soldiers on the open.field

l don't care nigger

Attached: 1ecf956ef7876c6cafc8fd3c47f32dbacc9ec9451feff707c423dc9f0649deeb.png (472x485, 168.65K)

I dont like sub shit but holy fuck how will OP recover from his burns?

You care enough to lose your time replying to me. Now go fuck yourself.

What does that shit have to do with what I've said?

>They promised them either riches or a glorious death in battle

Those are also lies told to their men. Even victorious armies are made up of miserable workers who spend 99% of the time marching and shitting in holes in the woods.

slave morality? I am becoming a master of myself. You are incapable of understanding the wisdom of what i do because you are way too seated in the concerns of the world. true power comes from discipline and enlightenment. if everyone was like you we'd all still be niggers in africa living a tribal lifestyle.

i am trying to appeal to the humanity in you for some reason. If i was evil i'd just continue controlling you like cattle.

Everything we do is an extension of nature. Everything a human does is human nature by definition. Human beings are above other animals but they are not above nature. We can manipulate and understand it but that in and of itself is nature at work.

Christianity is natural. More natural than anything else, actually.

You're right the fifteen seconds I spend typing out these posts is invaluable. I'll see myself out, just as soon as I am done laughing at your dumbass

Attached: 1550898560950.jpg (992x992, 178.97K)

You want to dominate people and rule over them, I believe that people should be allowed to rule themselves.

then what is not natural then?

Discipline is the subject of faggots such as you who can't enjoy earthly pleasures without losing their fucking minds from all the self-imposed morals they make up upon themselves. You're a slave of your own ethics and you'll die thinking you made the right thing as a US soldier who dies pointlessly on Irak while thinking he did his duty.

Being a traditional Christian nowadays is the same as being an edgy atheist in the 2000s

Being a secular Jewish-American doctor is 27.5% natural. Being a black Nigerian militia fighter is 37.33% natural. One of these is more ethical than the other because of its degree of naturalness.

Most people lack that ability. Most people aren't "free thinkers" and need someone to follow. I would say that it would be a net negative not to have thought leaders since this would leave large swathes of the country without purpose and meaning.

Just because you can think for yourself doesn't mean that others people can or should.

Cry me a river, faggot.

I'll be waiting then. Untill that happens, I'll continue to do whatever the fuck I want.

> you who can't enjoy earthly pleasures without losing their fucking minds from all the self-imposed morals they make up upon themselves.

i didn't make them up. they are self evident.
>You're a slave of your own ethics
i don't believe in rules i believe in expanding my consciousness. You are held down by chains of lust and desire.

whenever i see sickos like you it makes me think how justified the elites are for controlling you.

More ethical under what system of ethics?

Depends on how strict your definition of natural is. We use the word to make a distinction between human activity and non human activity. It's a useful definition but at the end of the day it's making a distinction where there isn't one.

True, but many of the people you want control over can think for themselves. Furthermore there is not much point in trying to gain control, at the end of the day I get little from making someone else miserable

So if anything a human does is an extension of nature, then how is switching dom/sub roles defying nature? After all,
>We can manipulate and understand it but that in and of itself is nature at work.

I'm not the domination guy. This is why the general idea of freedom is so important. Let the sheep who need a Shepard find them and let the wolves who can walk alone, walk alone.

> I didn't make them up. they are self-evident.
Self-evident to who, you? You thought they were right, and applied them to your lifestyle. You lie to yourself, putting a mascarade of "discipline" to a set of restraints that more than anything, lock you to the ground with the pretext of "for the greater good". Well, I decide what the greater good is for myself, and you'll die out thinking you did the right thing while the weight of your morality grounds you to the depths of the Earth.

>I don't believe in rules I believe in expanding my consciousness.
Yeah, yeah... And Epstein killed himself too, right?

>You are held down by chains of lust and desire.
Not really. In fact, they liberate me from any self-thought moral restrictions you and your pears develop.

>whenever I see sickos like you it makes me think how justified the elites are for controlling you.
You live under the same regime. Would that fit yourself into that description too?

>and let the wolves who can walk alone, walk alone
You mean litterally me?

It's not but not all aspects of nature are created equal. Patriarchal societies appear to do better than matriarchal ones for example. Women can rule and dominate men but we should judge a tree by it's fruits.