Veganism thread. I'm ready to chill out and laugh at the silly malzoan objections to veganism...

my sister is allergic to dairy, seafood, leafy vegetables, bread, and sugar. what the fuck is she supposed to eat?

dairy and seafood aren't vegan.
sugar is poison
how about every single edible plant that isn't a leafy vegetable.

nah how about meat. cause what does that leave? that's 3 and a half out of 5 food groups gone. she supposed to survive on nuts, mushrooms, beans, carrots, and onions?

shit I meant 4 and a half out of 6 food groups. cutting out meat would leave like .8 of a food group.

you aren't supposed to eat half those food groups anyway. it's just leafy vegetables and bread that they are missing and you really shouldnt eat bread either, so it's literally one thing.

>aren't supposed to eat fruit
>aren't supposed to eat sugars and oils and fats
I know you disagree but humanity literally would not be sapient without eating meat so
>not "supposed" to eat meat
I'll agree that dairy isn't supposed to be eaten once you are an adult. everybody becomes lactose intolerant to an extent.

Are we going to ignore the fact that industrial farming is also killing the environment? Pesticides are killing the environment, but that's okay because it keeps our crops safe, right? We're good people for eating vegetation only, even though it kills the surrounding ecosystem, right? Hypocrite. Funny thing is that the kikes that shill veganism are the same ones trying to cover up any data and evidence showing how industrial agriculture is also bad for the environment and how it's killing native species. Fuck the bees, right?

>Pesticides can contaminate soil, water, turf, and other vegetation. In addition to killing insects or weeds, pesticides can be toxic to a host of other organisms including birds, fish, beneficial insects, and non-target plants. Insecticides are generally the most acutely toxic class of pesticides, but herbicides can also pose risks to non-target organisms.

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2984095/#:~:text=Impact on environment,, and non-target plants.

>I know you disagree but humanity literally would not be sapient without eating meat so
wrong, it was actually eating psychedelic plants that gave us our higher intelligence

not just this but a lot of the land we use to farm crops that feed animals literally can't be used to farm crops that feed humans. it's not like we can reclaim that land and increase our plant output in a way that outstrips the energy we get from the meat made from that land.

that is actually one hundred percent retarded. humanity is separated from the rest of the animal kingdom because we cooked meat.

Exactly. I should have used this image in my post, here.

Attached: 1585218207187.jpg (2212x780, 1.34M)

that's totally retarded, we feed more plants to animals than we would grow plants if we just ate plants

>. it's not like we can reclaim that land and increase our plant output in a way that outstrips the energy we get from the meat made from that land.
says who? are you retarded? Organic life is returning to Chernobyl but you think we can't change the shit we have on a regular field?

>he watched joe Rogan and now thinks the stoned ape theory is real

This is a higher level of retardation

Attached: 1562793100187.gif (360x346, 170.14K)

>less complex animals and plants can handle the radiation in an irradiated area but that doesn't mean that said area can provide edible food for humans but it still means that we can absolutely dump enough fertile soil everywhere we grow animal feed to make it capable of producing plants that are adequate for human survival
are you stupid?

Learn what marginal land is, retard. You have no clue what you're talking about. You're just spewing things that MIGHT sound legit so that you can excuse yourself from my very valid point. I like how you just dodge everything by saying "dude that's so retatd do u know how retarded that sounds??"

>literally knows nothing about how radiation works
humans are literally the most sensitive living beings to radiation. I guarantee we still can't eat anything that lives in chernobyl. it's not like chernobyl was a fucking wasteland even during peak radiation, there was always living grass and trees there.

your 'marginal land' theory only makes sense if we were feeding or livestock with mostly grass, and *SPOILER* we are not. 90 percent of the soya we grow gets fed to animals. That alone would feed billions

>humans can survive on one crop

>literally every second we clear acres of rainforest to grow crops for animals but, trust me dude it's all about the marginal land, we are using our resources super effiecently!

>he wants to feed onions to billions
The land is still incapable of yielding crops that are sustainable for humans. It's much more efficient to farm animals on these lands and feed them with corn and onions than it is to plant crops just to have them die out.

>Hitler was a vegetarian
Lmao, do some more research on that brainlet.

So you're just going to completely ignore this?

>The land is still incapable of yielding crops that are sustainable for humans.
no, it's not.