loli boat edition
Loli boat edition
holy shit i was worried you were never making a new one.
why's that?
gonna ruin my drinking game. take a drink whenever you people post a picture of a stupid/laughable cartoon child sexualized. so pretty much every post you people do.
jokes on you nigger eldritch horrors on lolis are a fetish
that is not how "jokes on you" works mr. pedophile.
actual children don't need to be sexualized. You can't stop the fictionalized, hypothetical idea of children from being sexualized, though, nor should you even try to. Freedom of speech.
Glorification of fictional violence =/= pornographic fictional minors.
There is no objective, consequential difference between playing a violent video game, watching horror movies, or laughing at offensive, racist comedic material and masturbating to loli/shota pornography.
No victim, no crime. Period.
The assumption that it may incite someone to commit sexual abuse is not an argument.
This is because it attempts to split responsibility and culpability of any crime away from the individual who committed it, whereas no such culpability could possibly exist for the fictional pornography.
The fictional pornography does not attempt to incite abuse, either indirectly or deliberately.
And, for the sake of argument, if it could by some spurious argument be indirectly be read to do so, the individual could just as easily not act on those commands in a manner that harms a child.
The assumption that allowing such material to exist and maintain an active audience will "normalize" the acts and attitudes depicted or presented is not an argument.
Such assumptions, like the previous one, rely on the exploitation of fear and emotion. While it is true that certain subject matter or topics may become popularized, the likelihood that they be "normalized" is contingent on a variety of chaotic variables that controversial or offensive subject matter simply cannot. It also assumes that niche interests are destined to dissolve into a "communal consciousness" and be enjoined into the zeitgeist, which is also not true.
And then, even if pedophilic material could become "normalized", there is no evidence that this will lead to otherwise sensitive individuals or communities to adopt the attitudes and ideas espoused in the fictionalized materials, nor is there any evidence that actual instances of sexual exploitation or abuse of minors will be tolerated, ignored, or go unnoticed.
The apparent distinction between reality and fiction makes this so.
The logic these common points rely on is spurious because they are not justified by evidence, logic, or reason.
amazing way to rationalize being a pedophile is ok
whatever you say pedo
reality is something that doesn't concern you does it...
great argument
and yet here you are
amazing comment, keep going
first time seeing lewd riju, she's surprisingly hot
I definitely glossed over her character
>glossed
A state of extreme highness in which ones eyes are quite shiny and appear glossy.
Dude Dylan smoked some quality dank and got hella glossed on friday.
>no you
homer I'm cum
hi cum, I'm daddy
you guys give up fast
I thought that read "glass olive" for a second
horny energy is usually the overpowering one on Zig Forums
Definition of pedophilia
sexual perversion in which children are the preferred sexual object
specifically a psychiatric disorder in which an adult has sexual fantasies about or engages in sexual acts with a prepubescent child