Why do so many 20+ yo men call you a disgusting pedo when you show physical attraction to 16-17yo girl ?

If she's on period, nature says go for it..
young body can handle dick and babies way better than 30+bodies..

Idk if its this, I believe theres a stigma around younger girls so theyve built up a fear in their head and feel like they're trying to distance themselves from you.

Similarly to how a leftist will ignore logic to think with emotion

I eat kids for breakfast

Self righteous hypocrites mostly, but a lot of it comes from the current agenda of pro matriarchal conditioning.

A woman becomes a woman once she is BIOLOGICALLY a woman (eg. body development and the ABILITY TO BREED) this often occurs at ages as young as 11 (very rarely) but on average 14-15 is the norm.

"Men" in American society have been conditioned to ignore their own biology and being conditioned to be obedient doormats for the matriarchal overlords of their pathetic and sad future

Attached: 1355641843485.jpg (600x794, 165.64K)

For fucks sake, at some point as soon as people (and other animals, of course) were physically able to reproduce, they reproduced. It's simple biology. This 18+ stuff exists in modern society because nowdays people mature at a slower rate since they have to educate (finish high school at least) and even then many don't get to experience real world. That's why you have to be 18+, not because your body is too young. Of course, you're not supposed to fuck toddlers and 10 year olds, that's ill, but being attracted to a physically mature woman even if she is under 18 is not weird. The point is not to fuck minors even if you're attracted to them, you can't magically make them unattractive just because they are minors. It's simple biology, you can't beat that.

The only true way

I'm attracted to 16 and 17yos bodies when they look very developed, for sure...That's not pedophilia.
But it's abusive to the girl... Specially because girls that age are virgins sometimes, never been into anything serious and you can take advantage of them.
Also their bodies aren't gonna change by the time they're 18, which just makes it more obvious that the only reason you're into them at 16 is because you wanna be abusive.
Maybe you're not a pedo but you're into abusive shit.

actually if young girls all date older men, then young men become desperate incels who burn society down out of pure bitterness

>this often occurs at ages as young as 11
That’s when I got my first period, but it wasn’t regular until I was like 12 1/2.

They're normally secretly pedos themselves and desperate to hide it. As a result, they over-compensate.

It's because you should grow the fuck up and realize wide hips, actually round butts and fully developed tits are hotter than fucking children

>But it's abusive to the girl
Sex is not demeaning. Reproduction is the sole purpose of their body, it’s built around a baby incubator and there’s two milk jugs bolted to the chest. Now yes the modern feminist idea of sex considers it to be abusive in all areas unless it’s with a nigger or unless she’s 30 and has dried up eggs, but most women have lost 90% of their eggs by age 30. So if you wanted a particular race to go extinct you’d change the perception that sex and reproduction is demeaning in all circumstances and send all the girls to government run facilities daily to be brainwashed by a government employee to believe your genetic line must die out or it’s demeaning.
>the only reason you're into them at 16 is because you wanna be abusive.
You’re saying all relationships are based on abuse? That’s rather demeaning and Jewish to say the least

the default mode of every man is to fuck everything he can. he only doesn't because everything in the outside environment seems to do everything possible to prevent him from fucking everything he can.
just ask yourself what you'd do if every female would offer you sex. like literally every single one. all the time, whenever you want. no morals or strings attached.

Show tits

pastebin
.com/uRd7BwtU

Females brains fully mature by 18, its not arbitrary.
males brains take till 23 to 25 which isn't really practical.

Yea I never said anything about waiting until she is 30, and I also never said sex itself it's abusive.
I said that if you're unwilling to wait for them to be at least 18-20 then you wanna take advantage of their inexperience at 16.
If you're a 17yo kid or even an 18yo kid and you got a 16yo gf then having sex with her isn't abusive but if you're 25+ and you're looking for 16yo you want her because you wanna take advantage of her, no other reason, if you didn't wanted to take advantage of her you would wait until she turns 18.

>if you're unwilling to wait for them to be at least 18-20 then you wanna take advantage of
Oh so it’s 20 now? How jewish

you are overthinking it. it's not about "taking advantage". she's just hot and your dick gets aroused and you want to fuck. it's pure biology, nothing complicated.

>Are they genuinely not attracted by young girls
They are but they believe it's wrong.
> and unaware of the real "pedo" definition ?
Almost noone is aware of the actual definition requiring children who are pre-pubertal.
> Or are they just hypocrites ?
A very small proportion fit in this category.

Don't worry OP user, if you like teen girls you're a normy, not pedo, it's biological, and you're perfectly natural, however, you'll get along better in society if you pretend you're not attracted to them.

stigma comes from feminism and leftists. Fuck 'em.

Really it should be 25 for women, obviously unless she’s consenting, but she should be able to claim sex abuse at any time

I mean if you're 50 then yea, a 50yo shouldn't be picking up 18yos that's gross.
If you're 25, then you're ok dating an 18yo.
I know, that doesn't make it any less wrong tho.

Not him, but if I got that superpower, I'd be hanging out in the kindergarten.

fuck no

As in these men dating 22 yo or 25yo should be stigmatized as a pedo and locked away for decades?

Yes