Was this really necessary? Felt edgy for the sake of edginess

Was this really necessary? Felt edgy for the sake of edginess

Attached: 1590990838657.jpg (2388x2136, 442.35K)

it doesn't even make sense

I don't really find it particularly edgy.

I found it funny, and the fact it triggers Superman fanboys so much made me appreciate the comic all so much more.

>ripping Clark's skull and spine out to use as a weapon
>not edgy
come on now

Warren Ellis did it first in No Hero

and there some dude's spine served as a replacement dick

If he was alive, definitely, but when I read it, it was like meh whatever.

No hero was actually really good. Generally when Ellis is trying to be edgy it's either not edgy enough to compete with the really fucked shit (Blackgas was just Crossed with a condom on yes I know it came first) or it's just tedious "look how sick and twisted I am" posturing. But No Hero seemed to actually have a story to tell. It and Supergods are the best Ellis edge available IMO.

>Rest in peace, sweet creep

If it had been a big splash page showing it, yeah. An off-panel insinuation isn't too bad

Defiling a corpse so you can use it as fashion accessory is pretty edgy.

The idea of people in a post-apocalyptic setting using Superman's corpse to fashion legendary weapons out of his bones isn't that far-fetched. That's something i even take as granted. I myself if i had the chance would turn Superman's femur into a bitching sword.

>An off-panel insinuation

Attached: 1591102612811.jpg (2388x3056, 1.37M)

Everytime I will post this

Attached: sketch-1592944600922.png (1080x1671, 1.41M)

DC Official Handbook says Superman is 12 feet tall.

he's an alien though

That doesn't explain the extra bones.

So the issue here is you being a fucking psychopath.

Damn, that's pretty sick.

Oh shit, that changes things. Withdrawn!

It's not supposed to explain it, it's questioning it lol

What's sick about it? Superman's invincible. Anyone would think about using his corpse as resource for durable materials. Don't be daft.

Superman is only invincible if he's alive and absorbing the power of the yellow sun. There shouldn't be anything special about his corpse. He isn't Wolverine

Well, that's for others to find out, then. Let them carve his corpse first.

Weapon made from superman's unbreakable body parts is pretty neat idea not gonna lie.

the whole comic is edgy trash I don't know why people are upset over this

Clark will own Diana 10/10 times unless he's holding back because she will always go for the kill. I like the idea that at least in a small handful of continuities she got the drop on the big boy scout and got a victory. That said I don't care for this title, it's approach or the story it's trying to tell. But it's non-canon elseworlds so, hey, who gives a shit?

>Clark will own Diana 10/10 times unless he's holding back because she will always go for the kill.
Batman says otherwise. Wonder Woman > Superman, and Batman has kicked Superman's ass before so he should know.

Bruce said as much in Injustice when Diana and Clark had to fight one another in a special battle where neither could decline. Clark would take the loss, even if it meant death, because he wouldn't go all out while Diana would always go for the kill. And I like that. If Clark believes he can get a victory through weathering the Amazon's years upon years upon years of fighting experience then he's wrong. But if he plays for keeps from the start then, yeah.

Diana will always be Bruce's trump card for Clark. But her effectiveness will always rely on Clark's state of mind. Or his health. I could probably find the pages if you care enough for a storytime.

>Clark would take the loss, even if it meant death, because he wouldn't go all out
That wasn't the POINT AT ALL in INJUSTICE. The point, which was really retarded, was that Superman fight without fear because he always think victory is assured due to his immense powers.
And INJUSTICE isn't the only time Batman has said Wonder Woman could totally kick Superman's ass.

And this is me baiting you because you seem to care about this shit.

retarded

Attached: sensation81.jpg (473x630, 167.18K)

I know Injustice isn't the only time Bruce has had Diana as his backup strategy.

>The point, which was really retarded, was that Superman fight without fear because he always think victory is assured due to his immense powers
Oh. It's been a long ass time since I'd looked at it. I'll take you at your word.

>And this is me baiting you because you seem to care about this shit.
It is? You responded to me. I took it as discussion.

>Oh. It's been a long ass time since I'd looked at it. I'll take you at your word.
Yeah, but don't take my word for it. I know it had something with fear and really retarded. I remember it very well.
>It is? You responded to me. I took it as discussion.
I'm a huge asshole, so i like to bait people into pointless discussion trying to find all the ways i can annoy them just for... no good reason at all other than some mild kick.
Though, speaking honestly, you know none of these fights really matter, right? DC wants to sell Wonder Woman as a power-house as big as Superman, but at the same time are super-conscious about making Superman inferior to a female character. That's why you've this wishy-washy thing regarding fights between the two and such. It's just dumb marketing gimmick that at the end of the day just serve to create pointless debates between fans. Hell, even the idea of Superman "always holding back" is them wanting the cake and eating it too.

Yes, because it is amodern commentary
>Women kills/defeats mean
>Use him/his remains to win
I dont remember, why did she kill Clark in the first place?

>I DON'T remember it very well.
Fix'd.

The little autist in me wonders how she could rip his skull out. Isnt he nearly indestructable?
Or were Kryptonit still in his corspe?